| Literature DB >> 32160640 |
Jan Hartmann1, Mark Walsh2,3,4, Anne Grisoli5, Anthony V Thomas2,3, Faisal Shariff5, Ross McCauley5, Stefani Vande Lune5, Nuha Zackariya2,3, Shivani Patel2,3, Michael S Farrell6, Sherry Sixta6, Robert March2, Edward Evans2, Rebecca Tracy7, Elena Campello8, Ecaterina Scărlătescu9, Vanessa Agostini10, João Dias11, Sarah Greve1, Scott Thomas3,4.
Abstract
This article explores the application of viscoelastic tests (VETs) in trauma-induced coagulopathy and trauma resuscitation. We describe the advantages of VETs over conventional coagulation tests in the trauma setting and refer to previous disciplines in which VET use has reduced blood product utilization, guided prohemostatic agents, and improved clinical outcomes such as the mortality of critically bleeding patients. We describe different VETs and provide guidance for blood component therapy and prohemostatic therapy based on specific VET parameters. Because the two most commonly used VET systems, rotational thromboelastometry and thromboelastography, use different activators and have different terminologies, this practical narrative review will directly compare and contrast these two VETs to help the clinician easily interpret either and use the interpretation to determine hemostatic integrity in the bleeding trauma patient. Finally, we anticipate the future of new viscoelastic technologies that can be used in this setting. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32160640 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Thromb Hemost ISSN: 0094-6176 Impact factor: 4.180