| Literature DB >> 32160219 |
Alan M Friedlander1,2, Enric Ballesteros3, Tom W Bell4, Jennifer E Caselle5, Claudio Campagna6, Whitney Goodell1,2, Mathias Hüne7, Alex Muñoz1, Pelayo Salinas-de-León1,8, Enric Sala1, Paul K Dayton9.
Abstract
The kelp forests of southern South America are some of the least disturbed on the planet. The remoteness of this region has, until recently, spared it from many of the direct anthropogenic stressors that have negatively affected these ecosystems elsewhere. Re-surveys of 11 locations at the easternmost extent of Tierra del Fuego originally conducted in 1973 showed no significant differences in the densities of adult and juvenile Macrocystis pyrifera kelp or kelp holdfast diameter between the two survey periods. Additionally, sea urchin assemblage structure at the same sites were not significantly different between the two time periods, with the dominant species Loxechinus albus accounting for 66.3% of total sea urchin abundance in 2018 and 61.1% in 1973. Time series of Landsat imagery of the region from 1998 to 2018 showed no long-term trends in kelp canopy over the past 20 years. However, ~ 4-year oscillations in canopy fraction were observed and were strongly and negatively correlated with the NOAA Multivariate ENSO index and sea surface temperature. More extensive surveying in 2018 showed significant differences in benthic community structure between exposed and sheltered locations. Fish species endemic to the Magellanic Province accounted for 73% of all nearshore species observed and from 98-100% of the numerical abundance enumerated at sites. Fish assemblage structure varied significantly among locations and wave exposures. The recent creation of the Yaganes Marine Park is an important step in protecting this unique and biologically rich region; however, the nearshore waters of the region are currently not included in this protection. There is a general lack of information on changes in kelp forests over long time periods, making a global assessment difficult. A complete picture of how these ecosystems are responding to human pressures must also include remote locations and locations with little to no impact.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32160219 PMCID: PMC7065750 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling locations around Isla de los Estados and Mitre Peninsula.
Red–locations sampled in 1973 and 2018; green– 2018 sampling only. Circles represent exposed locations; triangles represent sheltered locations. Data from GEBCO Compilation Group (2019) GEBCO 2019 Grid (doi:10.5285/836f016a-33be-6ddc-e053-6c86abc0788e) and Natural Earth, free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com.
Fig 2Kelp canopy density from Landsat imagery.
a) Mean proportional kelp canopy density at the trimester time scale for both site (black) and regional (blue) scales. b) Mean proportional kelp canopy density with a 2-year running mean at both the site (black) and regional (blue) scales along with the 2-year running mean of the NOAA Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), lagged by one year. c) Relationship between the site scale mean proportional kelp canopy density and MEI shown in b. Red line shows the linear fit between the variables. d) Relationship between the regional scale mean proportional kelp canopy density and MEI shown in b. Red line shows the linear fit between the variables.
Fig 3Lessonia vadosa at Isla de los Estados, 1973 and 2018.
Benthic community characteristics based on 25 x 2 m transects (50 m2).
IE–Isla de los Estados, MP–Mitre Peninsula. Values are means with standard deviations in parentheses from surveys in 2018.
| Community metrics/Location | IE | MP | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of taxa | 44.93 (11.31) | 44.67 (7.51) | 44.89 (10.58) |
| Number of individuals.m-2 | 23.20 (15.79) | 10.67 (5.69) | 21.11 (15.23) |
| Species richness (Margalef’s d) | 16.02 (4.72) | 19.46 (2.43) | 16.59 (4.56) |
| Diversity (H') | 2.24 (0.61) | 2.70 (0.35) | 2.32 (0.60) |
| Evenness (J') | 0.59 (0.16) | 0.71 (0.07) | 0.61 (0.15) |
Top ten invertebrate taxa based on Index of Relative Dominance (IRD).
IRD = % numerical abundance (number of individuals.m-2) x % frequency of occurrence (freq.). Feed. = feeding groups: 1 = passive suspension feeders, 2 –active suspension feeders, 3 = herbivorous browsers, 4 = carnivores, 5 = omnivores, 6 = deposit feeders.
| Superorder/ Order/Infraorder | Name | Feed. | Num.m-2 (sd) | % num m-2 | % freq. | IRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sessilia | 2 | 6.07 (7.81) | 12.20 | 77.78 | 949 | |
| Echinidea | 3 | 1.33 (1.60) | 2.67 | 94.44 | 252 | |
| Lepraliomorpha | Unid encrust. bryozoan | 2 | 1.59 (4.71) | 3.20 | 72.22 | 231 |
| Actiniaria | 1 | 0.95 (1.05) | 1.91 | 83.33 | 159 | |
| Aplousobranchia | 2 | 0.74 (1.06) | 1.48 | 88.89 | 132 | |
| Aplousobranchia | 2 | 0.59 (1.51) | 1.19 | 83.33 | 100 | |
| Aplousobranchia | 2 | 0.45 (0.55) | 0.89 | 88.89 | 80 | |
| Imparidentia | 2 | 1.41 (4.79) | 2.83 | 27.78 | 79 | |
| Forcipulatida | 4 | 0.31 (0.35) | 0.63 | 100.00 | 63 | |
| Temnopleuridea | 3 | 0.35 (0.62) | 0.70 | 88.89 | 62 |
Top ten taxa observed on single M. pyrifera plant.
Fronds and stipes = 49.1 kg; holdfast = 3.5 kg. Percentages based on total number of non-colonial individuals (N = 18,770).
| Phylum | Class | Subclass/Order/Superorder | Suborder/Family | Taxa | % total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Pontogeneiidae | 28.31 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Pontogeneiidae | 28.08 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Ischyroceridae | 16.61 | |
| Annelida | Polychaeta | Phyllodocida | Syllidae | 10.52 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Pontogeneiidae | Unidentified sp. | 5.36 |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Isopoda | Sphaeromatidae | 4.34 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Pontogeneiidae | 1.31 | |
| Mollusca | Bivalvia | Imparidentia | Gaimardiidae | 1.30 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Isopoda | Arcturidae | 1.07 | |
| Arthropoda | Malacostraca | Amphipoda | Ampithoidae | 0.99 |
Fig 4The bivalve mollusk Gaimardia trapesina growing on the fronds of Macrocystis pyrifera.
Comparison of benthic community composition based on density (number of individuals.m-2) between locations and exposures based on permutation-based multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA).
| Source | df | MS | Pseudo-F | P(perm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 1 | 2420.4 | 1.184 | 0.279 |
| Exposure | 1 | 4523.1 | 2.212 | 0.006 |
| Location x exposure | 1 | 2316.3 | 1.133 | 0.314 |
| Residuals | 14 | 2045.2 | ||
| Total | 17 |
Fig 5Principle coordinates analysis of benthic invertebrate community composition based on density (number of individuals.m-2) by location and exposure.
Data were ln(x+1)-transformed prior to analyses. Vectors are the relative contribution and direction of influence of benthic components to the observed variation among sites (Pearson Product movement ≥ 0.5).
Species of fishes observed during expedition at Isla de los Estados (IE) and Mitre Peninsula (MP).
Pisc = piscivore; Inv = invertivore. Values are mean number of individuals.m-2, with one standard deviation of the mean in parentheses.–means the taxa was not observed. Family names in bold.
| Family/ common name | Scientific name | Trophic group | IE | MP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armored fish | Inv | - | - | |
| Pipefish | Inv | - | - | |
| Pink cuskeel | Pisc, Inv | - | 0.3 (0.6) | |
| Frogmouth | Pisc, Inv | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.3 (0.6) | |
| Magellanic rock cod | Inv | 1.3 (2.8) | 16.3 (13.4) | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 0.3 (0.7) | - | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 7.5 (8.2) | - | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 0.4 (1.1) | - | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 5.3 (3.2) | 1.3 (2.3) | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 16.4 (15.8) | 1.0 (1.7) | |
| Rock cod | Inv | 5.5 (14.3) | - | |
| Spiny plunder fish | Inv | 0.6 (1.2) | - | |
| South American eelpout | Pisc, Inv | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.3 (0.6) | |
| Eelpout | Pisc, Inv | 0.2 (0.6) | - | |
| Eelpout | Pisc, Inv | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.3 (0.6) |
* Magellanic endemic
+ Magellanic, Subantarctic Is. endemic
Comparison of fish assemblage composition based on density (number of individuals.m-2) between locations and exposures based on permutation-based multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA).
| Source | df | MS | Pseudo-F | P(perm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 1 | 7600.6 | 4.411 | 0.007 |
| Exposure | 1 | 4535.8 | 2.633 | 0.041 |
| Location x exposure | 1 | 6655.1 | 3.863 | 0.004 |
| Residuals | 14 | 1722.9 | ||
| Total | 17 | |||
| Pair-wise comparisons | ||||
| Exposure | t | P(perm) | ||
| Sheltered | 1.330 | 0.203 | ||
| Exposed | 3.928 | 0.027 | ||
| Location | t | P(perm) | ||
| IE | 1.621 | 0.036 | ||
| MP | 5.275 | 0.398 |
Fig 6Principle coordinates analysis of fish assemblage composition based on density (number of individuals.m-2) by location.
Data were ln(x+1)-transformed prior to analyses. Vectors are the relative contribution and direction of influence of fish assemblage components to the observed variation among sites (Pearson Product movement ≥ 0.5). P. = Patagonotothen spp.