| Literature DB >> 32160199 |
Paul Szpak1, Daniela Valenzuela2.
Abstract
Management ofEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32160199 PMCID: PMC7065742 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of the study area.
Relevant toponyms mentioned in the text and study area (box) with archaeological sites including in this study.
AMS radiocarbon dates obtained from the studied sites.
| AMS Lab | AMS Lab ID | Material Sample | 14C Age years BP | ± | Site | Precint/ Square | cal AD (1σ Range, SHCAL13) | Probability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 336650 | Plant (seed) | 290 | 30 | LL-019 | URC1-I | 1626–1668 | 0.814 | [ |
| Beta | 294874 | Charcoal | 590 | 30 | LL-019 | URC-1/III-IV | 1393–1424 | 1 | [ |
| Beta | 336649 | Plant | 590 | 30 | LL-019 | URC-1/III-IV | 1393–1424 | 1 | [ |
| Beta | 294873 | Charcoal | 640 | 30 | LL-019 | URC-1/II | 1319–1351 | 0.714 | [ |
| Beta | 336652 | Plant (seed) | 390 | 30 | LL-021 | URS2-I | 1575–1622 | 0.506 | [ |
| Beta | 180800 | Charcoal | 450 | 60 | LL-021 | R11/N5 | 1432–1507 | 0.755 | [ |
| Beta | 294875 | Charcoal | 450 | 30 | LL-021 | URS2-I | 1445–1489 | 1 | [ |
| Beta | 336651 | Maize (seed) | 490 | 30 | LL-021 | URS2-II | 1432–1456 | 1 | [ |
| Beta | 336656 | Maize (seed) | 360 | 30 | LL-093 | URC2-II | 1504–1589 | 0.875 | [ |
| Beta | 294877 | Charcoal | 370 | 30 | LL-093 | URC2-II | 1537–1599 | 0.618 | [ |
| Beta | 336657 | Plant | 390 | 30 | LL-093 | URC2-II | 1575–1622 | 0.506 | [ |
| Beta | 336655 | Plant (seed) | 620 | 30 | LL-093 | URC2-III-IV | 1323–1346 | 0.536 | [ |
| Beta | 336654 | Maize (seed) | 630 | 30 | LL-093 | URC1-III-IV | 1321–1349 | 0.636 | [ |
| Beta | 294876 | Charcoal | 680 | 30 | LL-093 | URC2-III-IV | 1300–1324 | 0.381 | [ |
| DirectAMS | 23334 | Maize (seed) | 380 | 45 | Huan-001 | Precint 74 | 1541–1625 | 0.722 | unpublished |
| Beta | 434056 | Basket | 530 | 30 | Huan-001 | Precint 132 | 1418–1443 | 1 | unpublished |
| DirectAMS | 23335 | Maize (seed) | 700 | 30 | Huan-001 | Precint 79 | 1353–1383 | 0.567 | unpublished |
| Beta | 101496 | Charcoal | 430 | 80 | LL-36 | Precint 58-Level 5 | 1442–1512 | 0.541 | [ |
Fig 2Relationship between isotopic and elemental composition of camelid fiber textiles.
Carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of textiles analyzed in this study, as well as other camelid fiber samples from previously published papers [26, 31, 32]. Samples are colored according to their atomic C:N ratio.
Fig 3Bone collagen δ13C and δ15N values for camelids from the Lluta Valley along with the standard bivariate ellipses for the two time periods.
Late Intermediate Period samples are indicated by squares and Late Horizon samples are indicated by circles.
Fig 4Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions of all of the textile samples analyzed.
Fig 5Results of the cluster analysis for the textile and human hair samples.
Fig 6Comparison of the camelid bone collagen and textile isotopic compositions.
Comparisons are based on standard ellipse areas for the camelid bone collagen from the LIP and LH in the Lluta Valley and the two textile groups (as determined by the cluster analysis) for the Lluta and Camarones Valleys. The textile δ13C values have been adjusted by +1.3 ‰ to make them directly comparable with the bone collagen.
Fig 7Interregional comparison of camelid bone collagen isotopic compositions.
Standard bivariate ellipses for the camelid bone collagen from the Lluta Valley and various sites where the camelids are believed to have lived in the highlands: Chinchawas [31], Tiwanaku [131], and Tulan (Late Archaic/Early Formative) [132].