Literature DB >> 32160184

Crucial Gene Identification in Carotid Atherosclerosis Based on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC) Data by Weighted (Gene) Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA).

Siliang Chen1, Dan Yang2, Zhili Liu1, Fangda Li1, Bao Liu1, Yuexin Chen1, Wei Ye1, Yuehong Zheng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Many patients are not responsive or tolerant to medical therapies for carotid atherosclerosis. Thus, elucidating the molecular mechanism for the pathogenesis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis and identifying new potential molecular targets for medical therapies that can slow progression of carotid atherosclerosis and prevent ischemic events are quite important. MATERIAL AND METHODS We downloaded the expression profiling data of PBMC in Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomy (BiKE, GSE21545) for GEO. The WGCNA and DEG screening were conducted. The co-expression pattern between patients with ischemic events (the events group) and patients without ischemic events (the no-events group) were compared. Then, we identified hub genes of each module. Finally, the DEG co-expression network was constructed and MCODE was used to identify crucial genes based on this co-expression network. RESULTS In the study, 183 DEGs were screened and 8 and 6 modules were assessed in the events group and no-events group, respectively. Compared to the no-events group, genes associated with inflammation and immune response were clustered in the green-yellow module of the events group. The hub gene of the green-yellow module of the events group was KIR2DL5A. We obtained 1 DEG co-expression network, which has 16 nodes and 24 edges, and we detected 5 crucial genes: SIRT1, THRAP3, RBM43, PEX1, and KLHDC2. The upregulated genes (THRAP3 and RBM43) showed potential diagnostic and prognostic value for the occurrence of ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS We detected 8 modules for the events group and 6 modules for the no-events group. The hub genes for modules and crucial genes of the DEG co-expression network were also identified. These genes might serve as potential targets for medical therapies and biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Further experimental and biological studies are needed to elucidate the role of these crucial genes in the progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32160184      PMCID: PMC7085238          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.921692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease that involves the accumulation of fibrous and/or fatty components in the intima of medium and large arteries such as the coronary artery, carotid artery, and peripheral artery, and the clinical manifestations vary with the arteries affected [1,2]. Ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks may occur if the carotid artery is involved, and carotid atherosclerotic disease accounts for approximately 18–25% of all ischemic strokes [3]. Prevention of stroke in patients with carotid atherosclerosis depends on the degree of carotid stenosis. These preventive methods mainly include carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and medical management such as with statins and antiplatelet agents [4,5]. Although the medical management is effective and may even serve as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis, patients who are nonresponsive to medical therapies or not tolerant of the adverse effects may not benefit from present medical therapies [6-8]. Therefore, elucidating the molecular mechanism of the pathogenesis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis and identifying new potential molecular targets for medical therapies that can slow progression of carotid atherosclerosis and prevent ischemic events are quite important. The molecular mechanism mainly includes abnormal accumulation of lipids, immune response, and inflammation, and monocytes play an important role [1,9]. Induced by chemokines, circulating monocytes can bind to adhesion molecules expressed by endothelial cells, migrating into the arterial wall and differentiating into macrophages. Previous studies focused on the role of circulating monocytes in the pathogenesis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis; however, few researchers have used weighted (gene) correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to construct gene co-expression networks for carotid atherosclerosis based on high-throughput data of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients. Zhang and Horvath first developed the WGCNA algorithm in 2005, which can be used for gene co-expression network construction, gene module detection, and hub gene identification, based on gene expression data [10-12]. Furthermore, gene modules and hub genes can be correlated with clinical traits if these data are available. The WGCNA R package was developed on the official R website (), making it more convenient for researchers to conduct WGCNA. Although WGCNA was first developed for analyzing gene expression data, it can also be used for miRNA, lncRNA, and even metabolome [13-15]. Previous studies screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using microarray data of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. For instance, Razuvaev et al. identified 11 downregulated genes and 19 upregulated genes by comparing the gene expression profile between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients [16]. However, DEG screening cannot reveal the interaction among genes or identify genes with crucial biological functions. In the present study, we focused on the possible underlying molecular mechanism of the occurrence of ischemic events. The mRNA microarray data of the Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomies (BiKE) were included. The expression data of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for patients with ischemic events (the events group) and patients without ischemic events (the no-events group) during follow-up [17] were used in our analysis. The genes in the gene modules were subjected to functional enrichment analysis. Then, we mapped DEGs into the co-expression network of events group and obtained 1 DEG co-expression network. Furthermore, we identified crucial genes based on the DEG co-expression network. The potential diagnostic and prognostics values of the upregulated crucial genes were identified.

Material and Methods

Datasets

The dataset GSE21545, from the Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomy (BiKE), was selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (). Series matrix file and platform data tables (GPL570) were downloaded.

DEG analysis

The series matrix file was annotated with GPL570 platform data tables, and the probe names in the matrix file were replaced by the gene symbols. Then, the 97 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were included in our analysis, in which 21 were samples of the events group and 76 were samples of the no-events group. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened using the “limma” R package. |log2(fold-change)|>2 and adjusted p<0.01 were set as the threshold of DEG screening.

Construction of co-expression network by WGCNA

Co-expression networks for both PBMC and plaque samples were constructed using the “WGCNA” R package. The algorithm filtered genes with the top 25% variance for further analysis, and WGCNA analysis was conducted for the events group (21 samples) and the no-events group (76 samples). The soft-power threshold β was chosen to ensure a scale-free topology. A topological overlap measure (TOM) matrix was created from the adjacency matrix to estimate the network’s connectivity property. A clustering dendrogram was constructed using average linkage hierarchical clustering based on the TOM matrix. The threshold for modules size was set as 50 for both groups to generate modules with proper size, and similar modules were merged.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment of gene modules

Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were conducted for genes in modules we detected using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.8 () to determine the biological function and signaling pathway involved in these modules. Count number >2 and p<0.05 were set as thresholds for the analysis. The differences between co-expression networks for the events group and no-events group were compared based on the results of functional enrichment analysis.

Identification of hub genes and crucial genes

Hub genes were considered to be the gene which had the largest intramodular connectivity in each module. Then, we mapped the DEGs into a co-expression network in the events group using Cytoscape v3.7.0, and we obtained 1 DEG co-expression network. Isolated nodes and isolated nodes pairs were removed from the network. The Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE), a plugin in Cytoscape to detect core subnetworks, was used to identify crucial gene clusters based on the DEG co-expression network. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and survival analysis were also conducted using the combination of the upregulated genes in the crucial gene cluster by SPSS 25.0 to show the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of upregulated crucial genes.

Results

Flowchart

The flowchart of our study is shown in Figure 1. We constructed the co-expression networks for the events group and no-events group and detected gene modules. Then, DEG screening was conducted, and 183 DEGs were screened. The DEG co-expression network were constructed by mapping DEGs into the whole co-expression network of the events group. Based on the DEG co-expression network, crucial genes were identified, and their clinical significance was evaluated by ROC and survival analysis.
Figure 1

Flowchart for the study.

Screening of DEGs

With the threshold of |log2(fold-change)|>2 and p<0.01, 183 DEGs were screened with 122 upregulated and 61 downregulated genes. The heatmap and the volcano plot showed the expression pattern of DEGs (Figure 2). Upregulated DEGs and downregulated DEGs with the top 10-fold-change are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 2

DEG screening. (A) Heatmap for the DEGs we screened. (B) Volcano plots for the DEGs. The X-axis represents –log(P.val) and Y-axis represents logFC.

Construction of the co-expression network for the events group and no-events group

One outlier (GSM892524) in the events group was removed, while all samples in the no-events group were included for further analysis, as shown in the sample clustering dendrogram (Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure 1A). The power of β=10 and 16 were chosen as the soft-threshold for the network of the events group and no-events group, respectively (Figure 3B and Supplementary Figure 1B). And the both the co-expression networks we constructed met the requirements of scale-free topology (Figure 3C–3E and Supplementary Figure 1C–1E). We detected 8 gene modules for the events group and 6 gene modules for the no-events group (Figure 3F and Supplementary Figure 1F).
Figure 3

WGCNA of event group. (A) One outlier (GSE89254) was delected by sample clustering. (B, C) Selection of soft-threshold β. (D, E) Fitness for scale free topology when β 10. (F) Cluster dendrogram. Each module was represented by WGCNA.

Comparison of co-expression patterns

KEGG pathway and GO-BP analysis were used to assess the biological function of genes for modules. Results of GO-BP and KEGG analyses are shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. The green-yellow module may be related to the occurrence of ischemic events. The green-yellow module is mainly associated with inflammation and immune response. Nonetheless, pathways associated with inflammation and immune response were scattered in modules of the no-events group. The KEGG pathway GO-BP terms with the top 10 count numbers for green-yellow modules of the events group are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. These results indicate that PBMC might play a role in the occurrence of ischemic events through regulating inflammation and immune response.
Figure 4

Enriched GO-BP terms and KEGG pathways with top10 count number for greenyellow module of events group. (A) GO-BP terms; (B) KEGG terms.

Table 1

GO-BP KEGG pathways terms with top 10 count number of black module for events group.

IDTermsCount−LogP
GO-BP
GO: 0006955Immune response2411.80
GO: 0007165Signal transduction243.82
GO: 0050776Regulation of immune response1812.65
GO: 0007186G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway151.63
GO: 0006954Inflammatory response144.60
GO: 0007166Cell surface receptor signaling pathway135.34
GO: 0045087Innate immune response122.89
GO: 0006915Apoptotic process121.99
GO: 0006968Cellular defense response97.24
GO: 0008284Positive regulation of cell proliferation91.31
KEGG
hsa04650Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity1914.53
hsa04612Antigen processing and presentation1512.70
hsa04060Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction113.16
hsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway71.59
hsa05142Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis)51.42
hsa05332Graft-versus-host disease42.13
hsa05330Allograft rejection41.99
hsa04940Type I diabetes mellitus41.84
hsa05321Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)41.37

Hub genes in modules of the events group and no-events group

Hub genes for modules of the events group and no-events group are shown in Table 2. The hub genes of the green-yellow modules of the events group were killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, 2 Ig domains, and long cytoplasmic tail 5A (KIR2DL5A), which are killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and are mainly expressed by natural killer cells and subsets of T cells.
Table 2

Hub genes of each module for events group and no-events group.

ModuleGene symbolOfficial full gene name
Events group
BlackACRBPAcrosin binding protein
BlueAP2M1Adaptor related protein complex 2 subunit mu 1
GreenDOCK10Dedicator of cytokinesis 10
GreenyellowKIR2DL5AKiller cell immunoglobulin like receptor, two Ig domains and long cytoplasmic tail 5A
MagentaGNSGlucosamine (N-acetyl)-6-sulfatase
PinkFHOD1Formin homology 2 domain containing 1
RedITGA5Integrin subunit alpha 5
YellowMPEG1Macrophage expressed 1
No-events group
BlackCTTNCortactin
GreenPRKCSHProtein kinase C substrate 80K-H
MagentaMAPRE1Microtubule associated protein RP/EB family member 1
RedFAM103A1RNA Guanine-7 Methyltransferase Activating Subunit
TanZHX1Zinc fingers and homeoboxes 1
YellowZBTB20Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20

Identification of crucial genes mediating ischemic events

The DEG co-expression network was obtained by mapping DEGs into the whole co-expression network of the events group. The threshold for weighted edge was set as 0.1. After removing isolated nodes and isolated nodes pairs, a network with 16 nodes and 24 edges was generated (Figure 5A). MCODE detected 1 significant cluster consisting of 5 genes for the DEG co-expression network (Figure 5B, Table 3). Among these 5 genes, 2 genes were upregulated (THRAP3 and RBM43) and 3 genes were downregulated (SIRT1, PEX1, and KLHDC2). Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a member of the sirtuin family, had the highest connectivity among the 5 crucial genes.
Figure 5

DEG co-expression network and crucial genes. (A) Red boxes represent up-regulated genes. Green boxes represent down-regulated genes. (B) Crucial genes generated by MCODE.

Table 3

Crucial genes detected by MCODE.

Entrez IDGene symbolOfficial full gene name
23411SIRT1Sirtuin 1
9967THRAP3Thyroid Hormone Receptor Associated Protein 3
375287RBM43RNA Binding Motif Protein 43
23588KLHDC2Kelch Domain Containing 2
5189PEX1Peroxisomal Biogenesis Factor 1
Combination of the 2 upregulated genes showed potential diagnostic and prognostic value (Figure 6).
Figure 6

ROC and survival analysis of up-regulated crucial genes.

Discussion

We screened 183 DEGs, among which 122 were upregulated and 61 were downregulated (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Weighted co-expression networks were constructed using the WGCNA algorithm. We detected 8 modules for the events group and 6 modules for the no-events group. We also conducted KEGG pathway and GO-BP analysis (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) and found that pathways related to inflammation and immune response were mainly enriched in the green-yellow module of the events group. However, these pathways were dispersed in modules of the no-events group. Hub genes were considered to be genes which had the highest connectivity in each module (Table 2). Then, the DEG co-expression network was obtained by mapping DEGs into the whole co-expression network of the events group, and crucial genes were identified by MCODE based on the DEG co-expression network. These crucial genes were THRAP3, RBM43, SIRT1, PEX1, and KLHDC2. SIRT1 had the highest connectivity among the 5 crucial genes, and the combination of 2 upregulated genes (THRAP3 and RBM43) showed potential prognostic and diagnostic value. Perisic et al. used the same dataset and analyzed the expression signature of PBMCs, and the DEGs they screened were different from the DEGs in our study. They grouped patients into a symptomatic group and an asymptomatic group. In the symptomatic group, patients already had plaque instability, which was defined as transient ischemic attack (TIA), minor stroke (MF), and amaurosis fugax (AF) [18]. However, unlike the previous study, we classified patients into an events group and a no-events group, depending on the occurrence of ischemic events during follow-up [17]. The difference in grouping patients may account for the difference in DEG screening results. Several previous studies conducted WGCNA on expression data of atherosclerosis. Using aortic samples from Apobtm2SgyLdlrtm1Her knockout mice, Deshpande et al. discovered that inflammation and immune response might play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis, and identified several related genes (TM9SF1, LEPR, WIF1, and SP1). In contrast to the sample Desphande et al. used, some researchers used human atherosclerotic samples from the GEO website and also found that inflammation and immune response might have important roles. Zhang et al. discovered crucial genes such as TNPO1 and ZDHHC17, while Wang et al. found that a lncRNA module was associated with inflammation and immune response. However, they did not elucidate the molecular mechanism based on the expression profiling of PBMC samples, and the grouping was also different [19-22]. The gene module detection and functional enrichment analysis indicated that the co-expression patterns in the events group and no-events group were different. We found that inflammation and immune response were clustered in the green-yellow module of the events group. A previous study showed that CD14+CD16– monocyte has a proinflammatory phenotype, and increased circulating proinflammatory monocytes were observed in the atherosclerotic models of ApoE–/– mice [23,24]. Belge et al. also discovered that proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α can be produced by activated CD14hiCD16+ monocytes, which might participate in atherosclerosis progression [25]. In addition, monocytes are involved in regulation of immune response in atherosclerosis. Some tissue macrophages and dendritic cells in the lesion originated from monocytes [26,27]. Evans et al. found that T cell response can be regulated by monocytes [28]. Furthermore, the TLR-4 expression in CD14hiCD16+ monocytes were correlated with occurrence of plaque progression and ischemic events in coronary artery disease [29]. In a recent experimental study, Bruen et al. showed that conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which is an anti-inflammatory lipid, can induce regression of atherosclerosis in ApoE–/– mice. In mice fed CLA, more monocytes differentiated into anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages [30]. Sun et al. fed ApoE–/– model mice phenytoin, a non-selective voltage-gated sodium channels antagonist, and the mice subsequently exhibited increased levels of anti-inflammatory monocytes and decreased levels of proinflammatory monocytes [31]. Statins were also found to affect monocytes in atherosclerosis. Using samples from patients, Gasbarrino et al. discovered that intensive statins therapy can downregulate the expression of the anti-inflammatory adiponectin-AdipoR pathway in monocytes and macrophages, instead of positively regulating this pathway, which may explain part of the residual cardiovascular risk in patients using statins [32]. These studies, together with our findings, suggest that monocytes participate in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis via mediating inflammation and immune response, both directly and indirectly. The hub gene of the green-yellow module was KIR2DL5A, belonging to the KIR family, and it is mainly expressed by natural killer cells and T cells. KIR2DL5A is an inhibitory receptor of immune response [33] and it is involved in immune response to viral infection and prognosis of certain malignant diseases. Shan et al. reported that patients with KIR2DL5A/2DL5B genotype had increased HCV clearance [34]. In colorectal cancer, the presence of KIR2DL5A is related to increased complete response rate in patients treated with FOLFIRI chemotherapy [35], and KIR2DL5A is also a protective factor against breast cancer [36], while in pediatric leukemia patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the presence of KIR2DL5A is associated with higher relapse rate [37]. However, few studies had reported the role of KIR2DL5A in monocytes or its role in atherosclerosis, and it might be a promising target to elucidate the molecular mechanism for the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. SIRT1 was the gene having the highest degree among the 5 crucial genes, and it was downregulated in the events group. SIRT1 is a type of NAD-dependent histone deacetylase [38] and participates in regulating inflammation, apoptosis, and cell senescence [39,40]. It also plays roles in stress response, aging, and longevity [41,42]. SIRT1 can also slow the progression of atherosclerosis by lipid modification, oxidative stress reduction, anti-inflammatory actions, foam cells, and autophagy regulation, and downregulation of SIRT1 was observed in a atherosclerotic mouse model [43], which is consistent with our findings. Recently, Lee et al. discovered that SIRT1 inhibits the adhesion of monocytes to vascular endothelia cells by suppressing MAC-1 expression in monocytes [44]. In addition, Nguyen et al. discovered that a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, evogliptin, can inhibit monocytes adhesion to vascular endothelial cells in an ApoE–/– mouse model, and this effect is associated with regulation of NF-κB by SIRT1 [45]. Therefore, SIRT1 might also slow the progression of atherosclerosis by preventing monocytes adhesion, which is the one of the initiation steps in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The upregulated genes, THRAP3 and RBM43, showed potential diagnostic and prognostic value. THRAP3, thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3, is an RNA-processing factors and can also participate in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway and transcription regulation [46-49]. Mutations in THRAP3 may cause DNA damage repair defects, and Vohhodina reported that loss of THRAP3 made 293T and U2OS cells more susceptible to DNA-damaging factors [49]. Ino et al. used LNCaP and LNCaP-AI prostate cancer cell lines to demonstrate that THRAP3 phosphorylation can contribute to the acquisition of androgen independence in prostate cancer via transcriptional regulation [48]. Another study, using high-fat-fed mice, found that THRAP3 can act as a transcriptional regulator in diabetes and can control diabetic gene programming [47]. RBM43 is an RNA binding motif protein 43 and its detailed biological function is not known. At present, it is unclear whether THRAP3 and RBM43 participates the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, although they were found to have potential clinical significance for the occurrence of ischemic events in carotid atherosclerosis patients. In the present study, for the first time, we constructed a co-expression network, detected genes modules, and identified hub genes and crucial genes in carotid atherosclerosis using PBMC expression data. However, datasets in GEO lack clinical information; therefore, it is difficult to correlate traits with clinical importance with gene modules in WGCNA analysis. The events group and no-events group had different co-expression patterns, and these differences suggest that monocytes are of vital importance in the pathogenesis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis via mediating inflammation and immune response. Then, we identified hub genes and crucial genes, which might have crucial biological functions in the pathogenesis of carotid atherosclerosis or potential diagnostic and prognostic value for ischemic events.

Conclusions

We detected 8 modules for the events group and 6 modules for the no-events group. The hub genes for each module and crucial genes of the DEG co-expression network were also identified. These genes might serve as potential targets for medical therapies and as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Further mechanism studies are needed to explore the biological function of these genes in the pathogenesis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. WGCNA of no-event. (A) No outlier was detected by sample clustering. (B, C) Selection of soft-threshold β. (D, E) Fitness of scale free topology when β-16. (F) Cluster dendrogram. Each module was represented by WGCNA. Top10 up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs. KEGG pathways for modules of events group and no-events group.
Supplementary Table 1

Top10 up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs.

Gene symbolOfficial full gene namelog2 (fold-change) (patients with events/patients without events)
Up-regulated
TNFAIP6TNF alpha induced protein 69.968020902
PTX3Pentraxin 38.826641354
RNASE2Ribonuclease A family member 27.978917622
KCNJ2Potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 27.481378497
SERPINB2Serpin family B member 27.18837765
PLA2G7Phospholipase A2 group VII6.901998631
BCL2A1BCL2 related protein A16.719719825
CLEC4DC-type lectin domain family 4 member D6.272368641
SAMSN1SAM domain, SH3 domain and nuclear localization signals 16.209244405
GPR84G protein-coupled receptor 845.186451434
Down-regulated
KLRC3Killer cell lectin like receptor C3−7.246559422
BTN3A2Butyrophilin subfamily 3 member A2−7.003853494
ANKRD20A11PAnkyrin repeat domain 20 family member A11, pseudogene−6.02418399
ZNF600Zinc finger protein 600−5.985685983
NLRC3NLR family CARD domain containing 3−5.579931019
LCKLCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase−4.825468373
GOLGA8NGolgin A8 family member N−4.799854266
CEP78Centrosomal protein 78−4.795917474
SLC9A3R1SLC9A3 regulator 1−4.381636674
SEP1Septin 1−4.097540674
Supplemenatry Table 3

KEGG pathways for modules of events group and no-events group.

Events groupKEGG IDKEGG pathwayCount−logPNo-events groupKEGG IDKEGG pathwayCount−logP
BlackBlack
hsa05034Alcoholism144.58hsa04611Platelet activation115.10
hsa05322Systemic lupus erythematosus135.13hsa05322Systemic lupus erythematosus114.98
hsa04611Platelet activation113.80hsa05034Alcoholism113.94
hsa05203Viral carcinogenesis101.82hsa04512ECM-receptor interaction83.83
hsa05202Transcriptional misregulation in cancer91.87hsa05203Viral carcinogenesis81.71
hsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway91.62hsa04510Focal adhesion81.70
hsa04512ECM-receptor interaction61.62hsa04810Regulation of actin cytoskeleton81.66
hsa04540Gap junction61.60hsa04540Gap junction62.20
hsa05219Bladder cancer41.38hsa04670Leukocyte transendothelial migration61.73
Bluehsa05410Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)51.70
hsa01100Metabolic pathways2183.72hsa05414Dilated cardiomyopathy51.59
hsa05166HTLV-I infection491.56hsa04640Hematopoietic cell lineage51.54
hsa04144Endocytosis481.76hsa04530Tight junction51.54
hsa04141Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum454.34hsa05130Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection41.52
hsa01130Biosynthesis of antibiotics452.15hsa00590Arachidonic acid metabolism41.32
hsa05016Huntington’s disease381.42Green
hsa04932Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)362.60hsa04151PI3K-Akt signaling pathway161.30
hsa05168Herpes simplex infection361.33hsa04144Endocytosis152.22
hsa00190Oxidative phosphorylation312.13hsa04141Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum132.66
hsa04110Cell cycle302.30hsa05166HTLV-I infection131.35
hsa04380Osteoclast differentiation301.96hsa04510Focal adhesion121.60
hsa03040Spliceosome301.87hsa04380Osteoclast differentiation112.52
hsa05012Parkinson’s disease301.51hsa04640Hematopoietic cell lineage92.61
hsa05161Hepatitis B301.40hsa04722Neurotrophin signaling pathway91.78
hsa04142Lysosome271.65hsa05220Chronic myeloid leukemia82.48
hsa00240Pyrimidine metabolism252.09hsa05230Central carbon metabolism in cancer72.11
hsa01200Carbon metabolism251.51hsa05212Pancreatic cancer72.08
hsa04660T cell receptor signaling pathway231.58hsa05100Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells71.71
hsa05132Salmonella infection222.21hsa05132Salmonella infection71.59
hsa05323Rheumatoid arthritis201.36hsa04210Apoptosis61.57
hsa03018RNA degradation191.62hsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway61.40
hsa04210Apoptosis182.26hsa04962Vasopressin-regulated water reabsorption51.50
hsa05131Shigellosis182.11hsa00510N-Glycan biosynthesis51.36
hsa00510N-Glycan biosynthesis162.54magenta
hsa05221Acute myeloid leukemia151.60hsa04670Leukocyte transendothelial migration72.60
hsa05134Legionellosis141.39hsa04142Lysosome72.48
hsa00280Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation131.50hsa04810Regulation of actin cytoskeleton71.39
hsa00520Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism131.43hsa04015Rap1 signaling pathway71.39
hsa05340Primary immunodeficiency122.19hsa03008Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes62.41
hsa00071Fatty acid degradation121.49hsa05131Shigellosis52.14
hsa00640Propanoate metabolism101.86hsa04520Adherens junction51.98
hsa03060Protein export91.92hsa05100Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells51.84
Greenhsa05132Salmonella infection51.75
hsa05166HTLV-I infection91.36hsa01200Carbon metabolism51.33
hsa03040Spliceosome82.34hsa04710Circadian rhythm42.22
hsa05010Alzheimer’s disease81.81hsa05130Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection41.63
hsa04110Cell cycle61.36hsa04621NOD-like receptor signaling pathway41.53
hsa00310Lysine degradation52.07Red
hsa04115p53 signaling pathway51.70hsa01100Metabolic pathways363.34
Greenyellowhsa05010Alzheimer’s disease134.71
hsa04650Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity1914.53hsa05016Huntington’s disease134.14
hsa04612Antigen processing and presentation1512.70hsa00190Oxidative phosphorylation124.96
hsa04060Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction113.16hsa05012Parkinson’s disease124.69
hsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway71.59hsa04932Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)92.46
hsa05142Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis)51.42hsa03010Ribosome82.14
hsa05332Graft-versus-host disease42.13hsa03050Proteasome41.44
hsa05330Allograft rejection41.99hsa00520Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism41.35
hsa04940Type I diabetes mellitus41.84Tan
hsa05321Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)41.37hsa01100Metabolic pathways1472.23
Magentahsa04120Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis367.03
hsa04010MAPK signaling pathway71.45hsa03013RNA transport333.48
hsa04664Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway41.55hsa04141Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum302.64
Pinkhsa03040Spliceosome252.57
hsa05168Herpes simplex infection81.91hsa04110Cell cycle221.99
hsa04931Insulin resistance61,80hsa03018RNA degradation214,38
hsa04145Phagosome71,78hsa05161Hepatitis B211,09
hsa00190Oxidative phosphorylation61,46hsa04114Oocyte meiosis181,33
Redhsa03015mRNA surveillance pathway171,78
hsa01100Metabolic pathways372.07hsa04070Phosphatidylinositol signaling system171.50
hsa04114Oocyte meiosis82.17hsa04668TNF signaling pathway171.20
hsa04120Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis81.70hsa04066HIF-1 signaling pathway151.04
hsa04668TNF signaling pathway71.69hsa04720Long-term potentiation141.93
hsa01200Carbon metabolism71.59hsa04115p53 signaling pathway131.51
hsa04722Neurotrophin signaling pathway71.48hsa05120Epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection131.51
hsa04666Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis61.58hsa04210Apoptosis121.40
hsa05230Central carbon metabolism in cancer51.41hsa00562Inositol phosphate metabolism121.04
hsa05211Renal cell carcinoma51.37hsa00520Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism111.75
hsa00010Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis51.35hsa05130Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection111.58
hsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway51.31hsa05110Vibrio cholerae infection111.52
hsa00512Mucin type O-Glycan biosynthesis41.63hsa00510N-Glycan biosynthesis101.30
hsa00620Pyruvate metabolism41.34hsa00280Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation91.05
Yellowhsa03420Nucleotide excision repair91.05
hsa05152Tuberculosis214.97hsa03060Protein export82.26
hsa04142Lysosome196.25hsa03430Mismatch repair61.15
hsa04145Phagosome194.88Yellow
hsa05164Influenza A173.05hsa05166HTLV-I infection162.96
hsa05166HTLV-I infection171.50hsa05152Tuberculosis112.00
hsa04380Osteoclast differentiation163.92hsa04010MAPK signaling pathway111.08
hsa05162Measles153.31hsa04145Phagosome102.01
hsa01130Biosynthesis of antibiotics151.52hsa05168Herpes simplex infection101.50
hsa04640Hematopoietic cell lineage144.68hsa05203Viral carcinogenesis101.24
hsa05140Leishmaniasis134.92hsa05161Hepatitis B91.64
hsa05323Rheumatoid arthritis133.96hsa05164Influenza A91.24
hsa05145Toxoplasmosis122.54hsa05140Leishmaniasis82.83
hsa04064NF-kappa B signaling pathway112.80hsa04660T cell receptor signaling pathway82.00
hsa05150Staphylococcus aureus infection103.77hsa05169Epstein-Barr virus infection81.57
hsa04066HIF-1 signaling pathway101.99hsa05162Measles81.39
hsa04620Toll-like receptor signaling pathway101.72hsa04612Antigen processing and presentation72.02
hsa04612Antigen processing and presentation92.11hsa05145Toxoplasmosis71.32
hsa04666Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis91.86hsa03040Spliceosome71.00
hsa04660T cell receptor signaling pathway91.45hsa05332Graft-versus-host disease62.99
hsa04672Intestinal immune network for IgA production82.75hsa05330Allograft rejection62.76
hsa05134Legionellosis82.40hsa04940Type I diabetes mellitus62.51
hsa05321Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)81.99hsa03050Proteasome62.42
hsa01230Biosynthesis of amino acids81.73hsa05320Autoimmune thyroid disease62.11
hsa05133Pertussis81.64hsa05416Viral myocarditis61.94
hsa05204Chemical carcinogenesis81.50hsa05323Rheumatoid arthritis61.22
hsa00480Glutathione metabolism71.92hsa05310Asthma52.27
hsa05416Viral myocarditis71.69hsa04672Intestinal immune network for IgA production51.59
hsa05310Asthma62.31hsa05223Non-small cell lung cancer51.35
hsa05332Graft-versus-host disease51.46hsa05321Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)51.17
hsa00920Sulfur metabolism42.42hsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway51.08
hsa00511Other glycan degradation41.54hsa01230Biosynthesis of amino acids51.03
hsa03022Basal transcription factors41.03
  49 in total

Review 1.  Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Christian Weber; Heidi Noels
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Modulation of Sirt1/NF-κB interaction of evogliptin is attributed to inhibition of vascular inflammatory response leading to attenuation of atherosclerotic plaque formation.

Authors:  Phuc Anh Nguyen; Jong Soon Won; Md Khalilur Rahman; Eun Ju Bae; Min Kyung Cho
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  SIRT1 prevents atherosclerosis via liver‑X‑receptor and NF‑κB signaling in a U937 cell model.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Zeng; Yu-Cai Fu; Wei Yu; Jun-Ming Lin; Liang Zhou; Lei Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  The proinflammatory CD14+CD16+DR++ monocytes are a major source of TNF.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Belge; Farshid Dayyani; Alexia Horelt; Maciej Siedlar; Marion Frankenberger; Bernhard Frankenberger; Terje Espevik; Löms Ziegler-Heitbrock
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan.

Authors:  Riekelt H Houtkooper; Eija Pirinen; Johan Auwerx
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  The sirtuin family members SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6: Their role in vascular biology and atherogenesis.

Authors:  Bożena Sosnowska; Mohsen Mazidi; Peter Penson; Anna Gluba-Brzózka; Jacek Rysz; Maciej Banach
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase.

Authors:  Anne Brunet; Lora B Sweeney; J Fitzhugh Sturgill; Katrin F Chua; Paul L Greer; Yingxi Lin; Hien Tran; Sarah E Ross; Raul Mostoslavsky; Haim Y Cohen; Linda S Hu; Hwei-Ling Cheng; Mark P Jedrychowski; Steven P Gygi; David A Sinclair; Frederick W Alt; Michael E Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management.

Authors:  Erik S Stroes; Paul D Thompson; Alberto Corsini; Georgirene D Vladutiu; Frederick J Raal; Kausik K Ray; Michael Roden; Evan Stein; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Børge G Nordestgaard; Eric Bruckert; Guy De Backer; Ronald M Krauss; Ulrich Laufs; Raul D Santos; Robert A Hegele; G Kees Hovingh; Lawrence A Leiter; Francois Mach; Winfried März; Connie B Newman; Olov Wiklund; Terry A Jacobson; Alberico L Catapano; M John Chapman; Henry N Ginsberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Thrap3 docks on phosphoserine 273 of PPARγ and controls diabetic gene programming.

Authors:  Jang Hyun Choi; Sun-Sil Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Mark P Jedrychowski; Yong Ryoul Yang; Hyun-Jun Jang; Pann-Ghill Suh; Alexander S Banks; Steven P Gygi; Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene-disease predictions.

Authors:  Sipko van Dam; Urmo Võsa; Adriaan van der Graaf; Lude Franke; João Pedro de Magalhães
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 11.622

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of Immune and Inflammation Characteristics of Atherosclerosis from Different Sample Sources.

Authors:  Han Nie; Chen Yan; Weimin Zhou; Tao-Sheng Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 7.310

2.  Contribution of FBLN5 to Unstable Plaques in Carotid Atherosclerosis via mir128 and mir532-3p Based on Bioinformatics Prediction and Validation.

Authors:  Lin Zheng; Xinyang Yue; Minhui Li; Jie Hu; Bojin Zhang; Ruijing Zhang; Guoping Zheng; Ruihan Chen; Honglin Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.