Literature DB >> 32159424

Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices.

Karen B Eden1, Ilya Ivlev1,2, Katherine L Bensching3, Gabriel Franta4,5, Alyssa R Hersh4,5, James Case6, Rongwei Fu1,5, Heidi D Nelson1,3.   

Abstract

Background: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for mammography screening, genetic counseling and testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and use of risk-reducing medications require assessment of breast cancer risk for clinical decision-making, but efficient methods for risk assessment in clinical practice are lacking. Materials and
Methods: A cross-sectional study evaluating a web-based breast cancer risk assessment and decision aid (MammoScreen) was conducted in an academic general internal medicine clinic. All eligible women, 40-74 years of age without previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer and who were enrolled in the Epic MyChart patient portal were invited. MammoScreen uptake and completion rates and consistency between breast cancer risk determined by MammoScreen and existing risk information in the Epic record were measured. Patient and physician experiences were summarized from interviews.
Results: Of 448 invited participants, 339 (75.7%) read their MyChart invitation and 125 (36.9%) who read invitations enrolled in the study; 118 (94.4% of enrolled) completed MammoScreen. Twenty-one women were categorized as above-average risk from either MammoScreen data or the chart review and 7 (33.3%) were identified by both sources. Physicians and patients believed MammoScreen was easy to use and was helpful in identifying risks and facilitating shared decision-making. Conclusions: Breast cancer risk assessment and mammography screening decision support were efficiently implemented through a web-based tool for patients sent through an electronic patient portal. Integration of patient decision aids with risk algorithms in clinical practice may help support the implementation of USPSTF recommendations that include risk assessment and shared decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer screening; decision aid; decision support techniques; mammography; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32159424      PMCID: PMC7307689          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  25 in total

1.  Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Douglas K Owens; Karina W Davidson; Alex H Krist; Michael J Barry; Michael Cabana; Aaron B Caughey; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Lori Pbert; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: The Implications of the US FDA's First Marketing Authorization for BRCA Mutation Testing.

Authors:  Jennifer Gill; Adam J Obley; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Medication Use for the Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rongwei Fu; Bernadette Zakher; Miranda Pappas; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care.

Authors:  Lynne I Wagner; Julian Schink; Michael Bass; Shalini Patel; Maria Varela Diaz; Nan Rothrock; Timothy Pearman; Richard Gershon; Frank J Penedo; Steven Rosen; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Bernadette Zakher; Amy Cantor; Rongwei Fu; Jessica Griffin; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening.

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Paula Scariati; Krystal Klein; Lindsey Watson; Mark Remiker; Michelle Hribar; Vanessa Forro; LeAnn Michaels; Heidi D Nelson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Development and evaluation of a decision aid on mammography screening for women 75 years and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Mary Beth Hamel; Roger B Davis; M Cecilia Griggs; Christina C Wee; Angela Fagerlin; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  The Impact of a Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid on Initiation of Mammography Among Younger Women: Report of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Rebecca A Hubbard; Holli H Seitz; Emily F Conant; Mitchell Schnall; Joseph N Cappella; Tory Harrington; Carrie Inge; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-01-17

9.  Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other.

Authors:  Jessica L Baldwin; Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig; Traber Davis Giardina
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2016-10-03

10.  Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Dawn Stacey; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Online information about mammography screening in Italy from 2014 to 2021.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Lucia Abagnale; Angela Avitabile
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Address Breast Cancer Disparities.

Authors:  Solange Bayard; Genevieve Fasano; Rulla M Tamimi; Pilyung Stephen Oh
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2022-09-03

3.  Assessing Information Available for Health Professionals and Potential Participants on Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Rachael H Dodd; Chenyue Zhang; Ashleigh R Sharman; Julie Carlton; Ruijin Tang; Nicole M Rankin
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.