Karen B Eden1, Ilya Ivlev1,2, Katherine L Bensching3, Gabriel Franta4,5, Alyssa R Hersh4,5, James Case6, Rongwei Fu1,5, Heidi D Nelson1,3. 1. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 2. Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon. 3. Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 4. School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 5. School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 6. Mongoose Projects, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon.
Abstract
Background: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for mammography screening, genetic counseling and testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and use of risk-reducing medications require assessment of breast cancer risk for clinical decision-making, but efficient methods for risk assessment in clinical practice are lacking. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study evaluating a web-based breast cancer risk assessment and decision aid (MammoScreen) was conducted in an academic general internal medicine clinic. All eligible women, 40-74 years of age without previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer and who were enrolled in the Epic MyChart patient portal were invited. MammoScreen uptake and completion rates and consistency between breast cancer risk determined by MammoScreen and existing risk information in the Epic record were measured. Patient and physician experiences were summarized from interviews. Results: Of 448 invited participants, 339 (75.7%) read their MyChart invitation and 125 (36.9%) who read invitations enrolled in the study; 118 (94.4% of enrolled) completed MammoScreen. Twenty-one women were categorized as above-average risk from either MammoScreen data or the chart review and 7 (33.3%) were identified by both sources. Physicians and patients believed MammoScreen was easy to use and was helpful in identifying risks and facilitating shared decision-making. Conclusions: Breast cancer risk assessment and mammography screening decision support were efficiently implemented through a web-based tool for patients sent through an electronic patient portal. Integration of patient decision aids with risk algorithms in clinical practice may help support the implementation of USPSTF recommendations that include risk assessment and shared decision-making.
Background: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for mammography screening, genetic counseling and testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and use of risk-reducing medications require assessment of breast cancer risk for clinical decision-making, but efficient methods for risk assessment in clinical practice are lacking. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study evaluating a web-based breast cancer risk assessment and decision aid (MammoScreen) was conducted in an academic general internal medicine clinic. All eligible women, 40-74 years of age without previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer and who were enrolled in the Epic MyChart patient portal were invited. MammoScreen uptake and completion rates and consistency between breast cancer risk determined by MammoScreen and existing risk information in the Epic record were measured. Patient and physician experiences were summarized from interviews. Results: Of 448 invited participants, 339 (75.7%) read their MyChart invitation and 125 (36.9%) who read invitations enrolled in the study; 118 (94.4% of enrolled) completed MammoScreen. Twenty-one women were categorized as above-average risk from either MammoScreen data or the chart review and 7 (33.3%) were identified by both sources. Physicians and patients believed MammoScreen was easy to use and was helpful in identifying risks and facilitating shared decision-making. Conclusions: Breast cancer risk assessment and mammography screening decision support were efficiently implemented through a web-based tool for patients sent through an electronic patient portal. Integration of patient decision aids with risk algorithms in clinical practice may help support the implementation of USPSTF recommendations that include risk assessment and shared decision-making.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast cancer screening; decision aid; decision support techniques; mammography; risk assessment
Authors: Douglas K Owens; Karina W Davidson; Alex H Krist; Michael J Barry; Michael Cabana; Aaron B Caughey; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Lori Pbert; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lynne I Wagner; Julian Schink; Michael Bass; Shalini Patel; Maria Varela Diaz; Nan Rothrock; Timothy Pearman; Richard Gershon; Frank J Penedo; Steven Rosen; David Cella Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Heidi D Nelson; Bernadette Zakher; Amy Cantor; Rongwei Fu; Jessica Griffin; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mara A Schonberg; Mary Beth Hamel; Roger B Davis; M Cecilia Griggs; Christina C Wee; Angela Fagerlin; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Rebecca A Hubbard; Holli H Seitz; Emily F Conant; Mitchell Schnall; Joseph N Cappella; Tory Harrington; Carrie Inge; Katrina Armstrong Journal: MDM Policy Pract Date: 2019-01-17