Literature DB >> 31479143

Medication Use for the Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Heidi D Nelson1, Rongwei Fu1,2, Bernadette Zakher1,2, Miranda Pappas1, Marian McDonagh1.   

Abstract

Importance: Medications to reduce risk of breast cancer are effective for women at increased risk but also cause adverse effects. Objective: To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force systematic review on medications to reduce risk of primary (first diagnosis) invasive breast cancer in women. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (January 1, 2013, to February 1, 2019); manual review of reference lists. Study Selection: Discriminatory accuracy studies of breast cancer risk assessment methods; randomized clinical trials of tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors for primary breast cancer prevention; studies of medication adverse effects. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Investigators abstracted data on methods, participant characteristics, eligibility criteria, outcome ascertainment, and follow-up. Results of individual trials were combined by using a profile likelihood random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Probability of breast cancer in individuals (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]); incidence of breast cancer, fractures, thromboembolic events, coronary heart disease events, stroke, endometrial cancer, and cataracts; and mortality.
Results: A total of 46 studies (82 articles [>5 million participants]) were included. Eighteen risk assessment methods in 25 studies reported low accuracy in predicting the probability of breast cancer in individuals (AUC, 0.55-0.65). In placebo-controlled trials, tamoxifen (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]; 4 trials [n = 28 421]), raloxifene (RR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24-0.80]; 2 trials [n = 17 806]), and the aromatase inhibitors exemestane and anastrozole (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.70]; 2 trials [n = 8424]) were associated with a lower incidence of invasive breast cancer. Risk for invasive breast cancer was higher for raloxifene than tamoxifen in 1 trial after long-term follow-up (RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.05-1.47]; n = 19 747). Raloxifene was associated with lower risk for vertebral fractures (RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.53-0.73]; 2 trials [n = 16 929]) and tamoxifen was associated with lower risk for nonvertebral fractures (RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.98]; 1 trial [n = 13 388]) compared with placebo. Tamoxifen and raloxifene were associated with increased thromboembolic events compared with placebo; tamoxifen was associated with more events than raloxifene. Tamoxifen was associated with higher risk of endometrial cancer and cataracts compared with placebo. Symptomatic effects (eg, vasomotor, musculoskeletal) varied by medication. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors were associated with lower risk of primary invasive breast cancer in women but also were associated with adverse effects that differed between medications. Risk stratification methods to identify patients with increased breast cancer risk demonstrated low accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479143     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.5780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  18 in total

1.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

2.  Using Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Intentions for Breast Cancer Risk Management: Intervention Mechanisms from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Karen J Wernli; Sarah Knerr; Tengfei Li; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; David Farrell; Hongyuan Gao; Erin J A Bowles; Amanda L Graham; George Luta; Jinani Jayasekera; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Ilya Ivlev; Katherine L Bensching; Gabriel Franta; Alyssa R Hersh; James Case; Rongwei Fu; Heidi D Nelson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Should Women at Lower-Than-Average Risk of Breast Cancer Undergo Less Frequent Screening?

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Endogenous hormones and risk of invasive breast cancer in pre- and post-menopausal women: findings from the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Sandar Tin Tin; Gillian K Reeves; Timothy J Key
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing across Multiple Countries and Health Systems.

Authors:  Ranjit Manchanda; Li Sun; Shreeya Patel; Olivia Evans; Janneke Wilschut; Ana Carolina De Freitas Lopes; Faiza Gaba; Adam Brentnall; Stephen Duffy; Bin Cui; Patricia Coelho De Soarez; Zakir Husain; John Hopper; Zia Sadique; Asima Mukhopadhyay; Li Yang; Johannes Berkhof; Rosa Legood
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Sulindac, a Nonselective NSAID, Reduces Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang; Jie Yang; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise Roe; Xiaoyue Zhang; Jie Ding; Pavani Chalasani; Christina Preece; Jessica Martinez; H-H Sherry Chow; Alison T Stopeck
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Reflecting on 20 years of breast cancer modeling in CISNET: Recommendations for future cancer systems modeling efforts.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Christina Chapman; Xuelin Huang; Jinani Jayasekera; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Jennifer M Yeh; Sylvia K Plevritis; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The effect of sex on the mouse lens transcriptome.

Authors:  Adam P Faranda; Mahbubul H Shihan; Yan Wang; Melinda K Duncan
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.770

10.  Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; John F Forbes; Mitch Dowsett; Simon Cawthorn; Robert E Mansel; Sibylle Loibl; Bernardo Bonanni; D Gareth Evans; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.