Literature DB >> 32158812

Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction in a patient with prior cosmetic breast implants- an elegent modification of a previously described technique.

Habib Tafazal1, Niall O'Hara1, Rachel Bright-Thomas2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast implants; Dermal sling; Implant reconstruction; Pre-pectoral

Year:  2018        PMID: 32158812      PMCID: PMC7061630          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2017.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPRAS Open        ISSN: 2352-5878


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

The prevalence of cosmetic breast implants is rising, so it is not uncommon to see new breast cancers arising in individuals who already have breast implants. Given their aesthetic concerns, and their previous choice to have breast implants, these patients frequently want to have an immediate implant based breast reconstruction if they require a mastectomy. This can be technically challenging as these individuals are generally slim with little autologous tissue cover (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).
Figure 1

Pre-operative marking for a wise pattern reducing mastectomy.

Figure 2

Dermal sling sutured to existing implant capsule with the mastectomy skin flaps retracted.

Figure 3

Post-operative pictures at 2 weeks.

Pre-operative marking for a wise pattern reducing mastectomy. Dermal sling sutured to existing implant capsule with the mastectomy skin flaps retracted. Post-operative pictures at 2 weeks. A standard implant based reconstruction in a ptotic breast uses an implant covered superiorly by the pectoralis muscle and inferiorly by a de-epithelialised dermal flap. There has been increasing interest recently in the use of pre-pectoral reconstruction to reduce morbidity from lifting the pectoralismuscle. This has been described with a prosthetic mesh (such as Braxon® manufactured by Decomed, Venice, Italy) covering the entirety of the implant and being placed on top of the pectoralis muscle. We describe a novel muscle sparing technique where the existing sub-glandular implant capsule can be used for superior coverage of the implant.

Case history

A 61 year old patient with previous subglandular cosmetic implants was found to have 32 mm of microcalcification on the central part of her right breast on mammograms. This was confirmed to be high grade DCIS on subsequent biopsies. She was counselled for a skin reducing mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy with immediate implant based reconstruction using a dermal sling for lower pole coverage. Her mastectomy specimen weighed 158 grams and her final histology confirmed a 25 mm area of high grade DCIS with clear margins all around.

Technique

A standard wise pattern skin reducing mastectomy is performed leaving the existing pre-pectoral implant capsule in place superiorly and retaining an inferior dermal sling of de-epithelialised breast skin. A fixed volume implant (of the same shape as the contralateral side but with increased dimensions to account for the mastectomy volume (Nagor GFX-EHP465)) is placed on the pectoralis muscle. The upper part of the implant capsule is then sutured to the dermal sling over the implant. The mastectomy flaps are draped over the “capsule/dermal pocket” and sutured to the inframammary fold in the usual manner.

Discussion

The benefits of this technique include coverage of the implant without disruption of the underlying pectoralis major muscle. No drains are required and, as no muscle is dissected, minimal pain is reported post-operatively, with early mobilisation. Such a technique can also avoid the issue of animation described in some patients with subpectoral implants. This technique is only suitable in those patients with a long nipple to inframammary fold distance; and given that there is a “false” posterior limit to the breast, in some cases, partial removal of the implant capsule may be required to obtain a satisfactory posterior margin thus making this technique unsuitable for some patients. Early results show a good aesthetic outcome using this technique which is suitable for reconstruction in some patients with existing implants who have been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Funding

No funding has been received for the production of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.
  6 in total

1.  One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Lisa Cassileth; Som Kohanzadeh; Farin Amersi
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Giorgio Berna; Simon J Cawthorn; Guido Papaccio; Nicola Balestrieri
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 3.  Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Jaime Schwartz; Joseph H Dayan; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy.

Authors:  G W Irwin; A Black; S E Refsum; S A McIntosh
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Breast cancer detection and survival among women with cosmetic breast implants: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Eric Lavigne; Eric J Holowaty; Sai Yi Pan; Paul J Villeneuve; Kenneth C Johnson; Dean A Fergusson; Howard Morrison; Jacques Brisson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.