| Literature DB >> 32158712 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, multileaf collimators (MLC) have become an important part of any LINAC collimation system because they reduce the treatment planning time and improve the conformity. Important factors that affect MLCs collimation performance are leaves material composition and their thickness.Entities:
Keywords: Particle Accelerators; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiometry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158712 PMCID: PMC7036419 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Phys Eng ISSN: 2251-7200
Physical characteristic of Millennium 120 leaf MLC [17].
| Number of the leave | 60 pair |
| Number of the central leave | 20 pair |
| Thickness of the central leave | 0.5 cm |
| Thickness of the lateral leave | 1 cm |
| Maximum field size of MLC | 40×40 cm2 |
| Leaf height | 6 cm |
| Radius of the end leaf | 8 cm |
| Leaf Length | 15 cm |
| Leaf density | 17.5 gr/cm3 |
Different thickness of the leaves and their number.
| Thickness of lateral leaves(cm) | Number of lateral leaves | Thickness of central leaves(cm) | Number of central leaves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 0.4 | 100 |
| 1 | 40 | 0.25 | 160 |
Characteristic of various tungsten alloys
| Alloy | Tungsten % | Iron % | Nickel % | Copper % | Density (gr/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 93 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 0 | 17.5 |
| 2 | 95 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 0 | 18.0 |
| 3 | 97 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 18.5 |
Physical characteristic for the suggested MLC.
| Number of central leave | 100 |
| Central leave thickness | 0.4 cm |
| Number of lateral leave | 20 |
| Lateral leave thickness | 2 cm |
| Leaves density | 18.5 gr/cm3 |
Values of depth dose data Varian IX derived from Millennium 120 leaf MLC and values of dosimetric parameters for Varian LINACs based on IAEA TRS 398 protocol, SSD=100, field size 10×10
| LINAC | R100 mm | R50 mm | D100 % | D200 % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varian IX IAEA TRS 398 protocol | 17.00 | 148.85 | 66.39 | 35.65 |
| EGSnrc Varian IX model results | 16.04 | 153.88 | 67.29 | 38.72 |
Physical characteristics the MLCs and their dosimetric parameters.
| Physical Penumbra (mm) | Leaves density (gr/cm3) | Number of the central leave | Central leave thickness (mm) | Number of leaves |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.16 | 17.5 | 80 | 5 | 120 |
| 5.15 | 17.5 | 100 | 4 | 140 |
| 5.11 | 17.5 | 160 | 2.5 | 200 |
| 4.95 | 18 | 80 | 5 | 120 |
| 4.4 | 18.5 | 80 | 5 | 120 |
Physical characteristic of the MLCs and average and end leaf leakages.
| End leaf leakage (%) | Average leakage (%) | Leaves density (gr/cm3) | Number of the central leave | Central leave thickness (mm) | Number of leaves |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.26 | 1.73 | 17.5 | 80 | 5.0 | 120 |
| 7.19 | 1.77 | 17.5 | 100 | 4.0 | 140 |
| 8.5 | 1.79 | 17.5 | 160 | 2.5 | 200 |
| 6.3 | 1.34 | 18 | 80 | 5.0 | 120 |
| 5.2 | 1.18 | 18.5 | 80 | 5.0 | 120 |
Physical characteristic suggested MLC.
| Leaves density (gr/cm3) | Lateral leave thickness (mm) | Number of the lateral leave (pairs) | Central leaves Thickness (mm) | Number of the Leave (pairs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.5 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 60 |
Dosimetric parameters suggested MLC.
| Average end leakage (%) | End leaf leakage (%) | Physical penumbra width (mm) | Build up Dose (Gy) | build up depth (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.16 | 4.86% | 4.7 | 1.12e-16 | 1.3 |