| Literature DB >> 32158380 |
Yumei Yue1,2, Yasi Jiang1,3,4, Ting Shen1,3,4, Jiali Pu1, Hsin-Yi Lai2,3,4, Baorong Zhang1.
Abstract
Heterogeneity between late-onset Parkinson's disease (LOPD) and early-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) is mainly reflected in the following aspects including genetics, disease progression, drug response, clinical manifestation, and neuropathological change. Although many studies have investigated these differences in relation to clinical significance, the functional processing circuits and underlying neural mechanisms have not been entirely understood. In this study, regional homogeneity (ReHo) and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) maps were used to explore different spontaneous brain activity patterns in EOPD and LOPD patients. Abnormal synchronizations were found in the motor and emotional circuits of the EOPD group, as well as in the motor, emotional, and visual circuits of the LOPD group. EOPD patients showed functional activity change in the visual, emotional and motor circuits, and LOPD patients only showed increased functional activity in the emotional circuits. In summary, the desynchronization process in the LOPD group was relatively strengthened, and the brain areas with changed functional activity in the EOPD group were relatively widespread. The results might point out different impairments in the synchronization and functional activity for EOPD and LOPD patients.Entities:
Keywords: early-onset Parkinson’s disease; emotion; late-onset Parkinson’s disease; motor; resting-state fMRI; vision
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158380 PMCID: PMC7052327 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Demographic information and clinical features of PD patients and healthy controls.
| Sample | 14 | 10 | 26 | 10 | ||
| Handedness (right) | 14 | 10 | 26 | 10 | ||
| Age (years) | 49.8 ± 3.6 | 49.7 ± 2.3 | 0.94 | 60.8 ± 3.5 | 58.0 ± 4.1 | 0.07 |
| Gender (male) | 8 | 5 | 0.7292 | 16 | 3 | 0.0896 |
| Disease duration (month) | 26.9 ± 17.0 | NA | 22.0 ± 17.5 | NA | ||
| H-Y stage | 1.71 ± 0.61 | NA | 1.42 ± 0.58 | NA | ||
| UPDRS | 34.7 ± 10.6 | NA | 33.7 ± 14.0 | NA | ||
| UPDRS-III | 21.1 ± 8.3 | NA | 19.8 ± 10.5 | NA | ||
| MMSE | 26.4 ± 4.4 | 26.4 ± 2.7 | 0.99 | 25.9 ± 3.6 | 27.9 ± 1.3 | 0.03 |
| MoCA | 24.4 ± 4.4 | 24.6 ± 3.7 | 0.89 | 22.0 ± 4.2 | 26.5 ± 3.2 | 0.003 |
| HAMD | 6.2 ± 4.1 | 3.7 ± 2.5 | 0.08 | 6.7 ± 4.7 | 3.0 ± 2.5 | 0.005 |
| HAMA | 4.6 ± 2.6 | 4.1 ± 4.0 | 0.73 | 5.8 ± 3.7 | 3.0 ± 2.2 | 0.01 |
FIGURE 1ReHo analysis. Two-sample t-tests results are presented, voxel level p < 0.01, voxel size >40, corrected by AlphaSim. Area in blue with significantly decreased ReHo value; area in yellow and red with significantly increased ReHo value.
ReHo analysis.
| Cluster 1 | Precentral_R | 42 | −18 | 66 | 62 | −3.9154 |
| Cluster 2 | Frontal_Sup_L | −21 | 30 | 45 | 41 | −4.6176 |
| Cluster 3 | Frontal_Sup_Medial_R | 6 | 57 | 21 | 94 | −4.163 |
| Cluster 4 | Frontal_Mid_R | 33 | 60 | 6 | 92 | −4.8285 |
| Cluster 5 | −18 | −18 | −30 | 265 | 5.6964 | |
| Cerebellum_4_5_L | 46 | |||||
| Cluster 6 | Temporal_Pole_Mid_L | −36 | 15 | −33 | 50 | 5.1976 |
| Cluster 1 | Fusiform_L | −30 | −66 | −12 | 70 | −3.9464 |
| Cluster 2 | Lingual_R | 21 | −54 | −9 | 325 | −4.6391 |
| Fusiform_R | 80 | |||||
| Cluster 3 | Temporal_Mid_L | −60 | 6 | −21 | 66 | −5.3395 |
| Cluster 4 | Pallidum_L | −21 | 0 | −3 | 44 | −4.0632 |
| Cluster 5 | Angular_L | −42 | −72 | 42 | 82 | 3.7453 |
FIGURE 2ALFF analysis. Two-sample t-test results are presented, voxel level p < 0.01, voxel size > 40, corrected by AlphaSim. Area in blue with significantly decreased ALFF value; area in yellow and red with significantly increased ALFF value.
ALFF analysis.
| Cluster 1 | Supp_Motor_Area_R | 6 | 12 | 60 | 63 | −4.7819 |
| Cluster 2 | Postcentral_L | −39 | −24 | 51 | 64 | −4.2421 |
| Cluster 3 | −30 | −27 | 33 | 520 | −4.3059 | |
| Thalamus_L | 48 | |||||
| Cluster 4 | Occipital_Sup_R | 24 | −93 | 21 | 145 | 4.9508 |
| Occipital_Mid_R | 64 | |||||
| Cluster 5 | Temporal_Mid_R | 48 | −66 | 15 | 42 | 4.2245 |
| Cluster 1 | Angular_L | −57 | −60 | 27 | 63 | 3.5283 |
FIGURE 3(A) Correlations diagram between right medial superior frontal gyrus ReHo values and HAMD score in EOPD group (r = 0.5703, p = 0.0448, not corrected, Spearman rank correlation). (B) Correlations diagram between left fusiform gyrus and MOCA score in LOPD group (r = 0.4972, p = 0.0474, Bonferroni correction, Spearman rank correlation).