| Literature DB >> 32158151 |
Abdelbaset E Abdelbaset1, Maha I Hamed2, Mostafa F N Abushahba3,4, Mohamed S Rawy5, Amal S M Sayed3, Jeffrey J Adamovicz4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The cosmopolite protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, has a significant economic and medical impact. Cats traditionally play a predominant role in the disease maintenance cycle; however, humans can be infected as a result of milk and meat consumption of Toxoplasma-infected livestock. In addition, infected pregnant women, even symptomless, can pass the disease to their unborn fetus. The limited clinical records and absence of specific national educational programs in countries like Egypt underscore the need for periodic toxoplasmosis disease evaluation. Here, we identified T. gondii seroprevalence among sheep and pregnant women and the associated risk factors in El-Minya Governorate, Egypt.Entities:
Keywords: Egypt; abortion; risk factors; sheep; toxoplasmosis; zoonoses
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158151 PMCID: PMC7020121 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.54-60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Satellite image of Egypt showing the general study locations. The survey covered different villages in Dayr Mawas and Matay districts, El-Minya Governorate, Egypt. [Source: The map was downloaded from http://www.gadm.org. ArcGIS 10.5 Desktop Software (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, California, USA) and GIMP 2.8.10 program (https://www.gimp.org/) were utilized in map processing].
Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence rate in sheep and humans.
| Species | Latex agglutination test (screening) | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (confirmation) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of tested | Positive number (%) | Negative number (%) | Number of tested | Positive number (%) | Negative number (%) | |
| Sheep | 151 | 64 (42.4) | 87 (57.6) | 64 | 59 (92.2) | 5 (7.8) |
| Human | 96 | 29 (30.2) | 67 (69.8) | 29 | 22 (75.9) | 7 (24.1) |
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibody and the associated risk factors in sheep.
| Factor | Number tested | Seroprevalence | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number (%) | Negative number (%) | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||
| <1 | 19 | 0 (0) | 19 (100) | Reference | <0.0001 |
| 1-2 | 21 | 14 (66.7) | 7 (33.3) | 75 (4.0-1431) | |
| >2 | 111 | 45 (40.5) | 66 (59.5) | 27 (1.6-454) | |
| Locality | |||||
| Matay | 94 | 54 (57.4) | 40 (42.5) | 14 (5.1-38) | <0.0001 |
| Dayr Mawas | 57 | 5 (8.8) | 52 (91.2) | 0.07 (0.03-0.2) | |
| Pregnancy | |||||
| Pregnant | 84 | 38 (45.2) | 46 (54.8) | 1.81 (0.9-3.5) | 0.09 |
| Non-pregnant | 67 | 21 (31.3) | 46 (68.7) | 0.55 (0.3-1.1) | |
| Abortion history | |||||
| Yes | 3 | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 3.2 (0.3-36) | 0.6 |
| No | 148 | 57 (38.5) | 91 (61.5) | 0.3 (0.03-3.5) | |
Factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity among the pregnant women.
| Factor | Number of tested | Seroprevalence | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number (%) | Negative number (%) | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||
| 17-19 | 12 | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | Reference | 0.7 |
| 20-24 | 32 | 9 (28.1) | 23 (71.9) | 4.3 (0.5-38) | |
| 25-29 | 29 | 6 (20.7) | 23 (79.3) | 2.9 (0.3-27) | |
| 30-35 | 15 | 4 (26.7) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (0.4-42) | |
| >35 | 8 | 2 (25) | 6 (75) | 3.7 (0.3-49) | |
| Locality | |||||
| Matay | 46 | 13 (28.3) | 33 (71.7) | 1.8 (0.7-4.7) | 0.3 |
| Dayr Mawas | 50 | 9 (18) | 41 (82) | 0.6 (0.2-1.5) | |
| Pregnancy | |||||
| 1sttrimester | 16 | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | Reference | 0.02 |
| 2nd trimester | 28 | 10 (35.7) | 18 (64.3) | 19 (1.0-345) | |
| 3rd trimester | 52 | 12 (23.1) | 40 (76.9) | 10 (0.6-182) | |
| Parity | |||||
| One time | 28 | 3 (10.7) | 25 (89.3) | 0.3 (0.08-1.1) | 0.1 |
| Two times or more | 68 | 19 (27.9) | 49 (72.1) | 3.2 (0.9-12) | |
| Exposure to soil | |||||
| Yes | 33 | 5 (15.1) | 28 (84.8) | 0.48 (0.2-1.5) | 0.2 |
| No | 63 | 17 (27) | 46 (73) | 2.1 (0.7-6.2) | |
| Contact with cat | |||||
| Yes | 28 | 12 (42.9) | 16 (57.1) | 4.4 (1.6-12) | 0.006 |
| No | 68 | 10 (14.7) | 58 (85.3) | 0.2 (0.08-0.6) | |
| Consumption of undercooked mutton | |||||
| Yes | 18 | 12 (66.7) | 6 (33.3) | 14 (4.2-44) | <0.0001 |
| No | 78 | 10 (12.8) | 68 (87.2) | 0.07 (0.02-0.2) | |