| Literature DB >> 29606142 |
Yara M Al-Kappany1, Ibrahim E Abbas1, Brecht Devleesschauwer2, Pierre Dorny3,4, Malgorzata Jennes5, Eric Cox5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease that affects a wide range of animals, including small ruminants. Sheep and goats are considered as biological indicators for the contamination of the environment with Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. In addition, in countries such as Egypt, where sheep and goat meat is frequently consumed, T. gondii infection in small ruminants may also pose a public health risk. To establish baseline estimates of the prevalence of T. gondii infection in Egyptian small ruminants, we used an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to assess the seroprevalence in 398 sheep from four Egyptian governorates (Cairo, Giza, Dakahlia and Sharkia) and in 100 goats from Dakahlia. The positive and negative agreements of both tests were calculated and the true prevalence was estimated using a Bayesian approach.Entities:
Keywords: Egypt; Filter paper; Small ruminants; Toxoplasma gondii; True prevalence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29606142 PMCID: PMC5879817 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1440-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Governorates of Egypt. CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=32089528
Prior information on diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the applied assays, based on Shaapan et al. [4]
| Test | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution | Mean | 95% UI | Distribution | Mean | 95% UI | |
| IFA | Beta(82,20) | 0.80 | (0.72–0.87) | Beta(181,17) | 0.91 | (0.87–0.95) |
| ELISA | Beta(92,10) | 0.90 | (0.84–0.95) | Beta(170,28) | 0.86 | (0.81–0.90) |
UI uncertainty interval, IFA indirect immunofluorescence assay, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Positive samples (x) and apparent prevalence (AP, %) with 95% exact confidence interval (CI) for Toxoplasma gondii infection by population and diagnostic test
| Diagnostic test | Goats, Dakahlia ( | Sheep, Cairo ( | Sheep, Dakahlia ( | Sheep, Giza ( | Sheep, Sharkia ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | AP (95%CI) | x | AP (95%CI) | x | AP (95%CI) | x | AP (95%CI) | x | AP (95%CI) | |
| IFA | 54 | 54 (44–64) | 20 | 20 (13–29) | 38 | 38 (28–48) | 32 | 32 (23–42) | 34 | 34 (25–45) |
| ELISA | 59 | 59 (49–69) | 12 | 12 (6.4–20) | 27 | 27 (19–37) | 26 | 26 (18–36) | 17 | 17 (10–26) |
IFA indirect immunofluorescence assay, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Classification of samples according to indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
| Diagnostic test | Goats, Dakahlia | Sheep, Cairo | Sheep, Dakahlia | Sheep, Giza | Sheep, Sharkia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFA | ELISA | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 80 | 12 | 27 | 24 | 17 |
| 1 | 0 | 44 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 17 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 272 | 80 | 62 | 65 | 65 |
1 = positive; 0 = negative