| Literature DB >> 32155800 |
Jie Zeng1,2, Zhijun Zhang1,2,3, Qi Zhu1,2, Zhiyan Jiang1,2, Guohua Zhong1,2.
Abstract
The increasing resistance of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani highlights the need for highly effective and environmentally benign agents. Natural β-carboline alkaloids were simplified to obtain a series of indole derivatives, and their fungicidal activity and preliminary mode of action against R. solani were also evaluated. The initial hit indole (7) displayed significant fungicidal activity with an EC50 value of 25.56 μg/mL, and was selected for further optimization. Importantly, compound 55, the most active compound, had an EC50 value of 0.62 μg/mL, and approximately 300-fold more potent than validamycin A (EC50 = 183.00 μg/mL). In vivo bioassay also demonstrated that compound 55 showed better fungicidal activities than validamycin A. Moreover, the mechanism studies revealed that compound 55 not only caused remarkable morphological and structural alterations of R. solani hyphae, but also induced the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and interfered with DNA synthesis. Therefore, compound 55 showed superior fungicidal activity against R. solani, and the elucidated mode of action supported the potential application of compound 55 against rice sheath blight.Entities:
Keywords: Rhizoctonia solani; fungicidal activity; indole; simplification; β-carboline
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32155800 PMCID: PMC7179428 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25051189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The structure of the β-carboline alkaloids and their derivatives.
In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 7–26. a
| Compound | R | Percentage Inhibition (%) | EC50 (95%CI c) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | |||
| Indole ( | H | 87.68 ± 1.26 | 26.33 ± 3.64 | 25.56 (23.61–27.66) |
|
| CH3 | 28.65 ± 1.69 | 12.47 ± 2.21 | - d |
|
| Ph | 25.45 ± 5.45 | 10.67 ± 1.79 | - |
|
| COOCH3 | 26.04 ± 1.54 | 9.35 ± 1.33 | - |
|
| cyclopropyl | 29.21 ± 1.63 | 22.47 ± 2.33 | 58.35 (48.45–70.55) |
|
| morpholine | 32.79 ± 3.36 | 2.15 ± 2.46 | 92.19 (78.24–114.69) |
|
|
| 20.97 ± 3.22 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 4-Cl-Ph | 51.35 ± 3.57 | 40.22 ± 0.48 | 52.84 (39.46–70.83) |
|
| Me | 55.81 ± 0.74 | 36.08 ± 2.68 | 51.96 (39.78–65.79) |
|
| Et | 57.53 ± 3.64 | 35.01 ± 0.91 | 53.20 (39.11–68.64) |
|
| 56.88 ± 0.91 | 32.43 ± 2.73 | 53.43 (43.14–65.59) | |
|
| 44.23 ± 1.97 | 36.51 ± 1.97 | 77.79 (55.81–128.22) | |
|
| - | 54.05 ± 1.35 | 20.27 ± 1.35 | 60.22 (51.18–71.11) |
|
| Ac | 56.18 ± 1.79 | 24.94 ± 1.79 | |
|
|
| 71.75 ± 4.26 | 27.38 ± 2.73 | 40.74 (26.89–54.89) |
| indole-3-carboxylic acid ( | 20.18 ± 1.79 | 15.95 ± 1.79 | - | |
| indole-3-carbinol ( | 30.67 ± 1.79 | 10.45 ± 1.79 | - | |
| indole-3-acetic acid ( | 44.94 ± 1.79 | 2.25 ± 1.79 | - | |
| 33.71 ± 1.79 | 22.47 ± 1.79 | - | ||
| Gramine ( | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | |
| validamycin A | 36.68 ± 1.09 | 18.91 ± 0.49 | 183.00 (162.62–210.66) | |
a Values are the mean ± SD of three replicates. b novel compounds. c 95% confidence interval. d not determined.
In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 27–52. a
| Compound | R | Percentage Inhibition (%) | EC50 (95%CI c) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | |||
|
| 90.84 ± 8.54 | 5.57 ± 2.44 | 32.82 (29.22–36.55) | |
|
| 73.24 ± 4.39 | 40.66 ± 1.74 | 24.07 (20.57–27.78) | |
|
| Me | 89.54 ± 2.47 | 34.44 ± 3.69 | 21.94 (19.86–24.11) |
|
| Et | 93.55 ± 0.00 | 27.42 ± 1.61 | 22.97 (21.11–24.95) |
|
| 88.09 ± 1.03 | 33.33 ± 5.45 | 28.25 (13.28–40.70) | |
|
| 84.52 ± 1.03 | 41.07 ± 1.78 | 21.39 (12.27–29.28) | |
|
| 72.60 ± 1.29 | 42.26 ± 1.03 | 31.25 (16.38–44.19) | |
|
| 63.98 ± 0.93 | 32.26 ± 4.84 | 45.71 (34.83–57.55) | |
|
| cyclopropyl | 87.63 ± 1.86 | 55.38 ± 1.86 | 17.47 (9.85–24.93) |
|
| cyclobutyl | 76.88 ± 0.93 | 34.95 ± 2.46 | 29.93 (21.62–37.83) |
|
| cyclopentyl | 76.19 ± 2.73 | 29.38 ± 1.96 | 35.21 (24.04–46.05) |
|
| cyclohexyl | 71.75 ± 0.98 | 41.24 ± 5.1 | 28.25 (13.28–40.70) |
|
| Ph | 79.74 ± 4.08 | 57.43 ± 1.95 | 8.80 (2.29–14.39) |
|
| 2-F-Ph | 87.20 ± 1.01 | 66.26 ± 1.01 | 3.53 (0.91–8.54) |
|
| 2-Cl-Ph | 81.38 ± 1.01 | 71.90 ± 2.55 | 2.15 (0.54–6.01) |
|
| 2-Br-Ph | 79.06 ± 1.74 | 69.77 ± 0.74 | 2.74 (0.51–7.79) |
|
| 2-CF3-Ph | 74.15 ± 1.10 | 64.74 ± 0.84 | 9.25 (4.65–14.06) |
|
| 3-CF3-Ph | 71.05 ± 0.93 | 51.61 ± 1.61 | 17.81 (2.34–29.25) |
|
| 4-CF3-Ph | 40.68 ± 1.69 | 34.74 ± 1.20 | 85.40 (65.26–127.37) |
|
| 4-OCF3-Ph | 38.42 ± 3.53 | 26.19 ± 1.03 | 89.06 (77.04–106.52) |
|
| 69.17 ± 2.66 | 52.30 ± 1.01 | 17.70 (7.67–26.35) | |
|
| Me | 100.00 | 75.22 ± 0.78 | 4.12 (2.01–5.28) |
|
| Et | 79.73 ± 1.35 | 53.60 ± 4.74 | 12.68 (7.37–17.31) |
|
| 80.18 ± 1.56 | 59.01 ± 4.34 | 6.87 (1.00–13.49) | |
|
| 80.80 ± 1.74 | 58.11 ± 1.74 | 17.87 (2.75–31.36) | |
|
| 30.11 ± 1.86 | 24.73 ± 1.86 | 129.48 (91.93–278.45) | |
a Values are the mean ± SD of three replicates. b novel compound. c 95% confidence interval.
In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 53–79. a
| Compound | R | Percentage Inhibition (%) | EC50 (95%CI b) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | |||
|
| 4-CH3 | 100 | 76.80±3.15 | 4.99 (4.46–5.50) |
|
| 4-OCH3 | 87.23 ± 2.21 | 50.56 ± 1.33 | 25.30 (16.51–35.74) |
|
| 4-F |
|
|
|
|
| 4-Cl |
|
|
|
|
| 4-Br | 100 | 58.65 ± 1.93 | 7.96 (6.99–9.07) |
|
| 4-NO2 | 100 | 18.99 ± 2.33 | 16.13 (4.45–30.55) |
|
| 4-CN | 93.26 ± 1.37 | 6.32 ± 1.71 | 45.50 (26.42–81.96) |
|
| 4-CF3 | 100 | 8.86 ± 0.89 | 38.58 (25.45–51.97) |
|
| 4-COOH | 34.83 ± 1.21 | 6.32 ± 1.01 | 66.89 (38.42–94.17) |
|
| 4-COOCH3 | 64.05 ± 6.38 | 0.00 | 46.76 (21.08–79.48) |
|
| 5-CH3 | 100 | 37.44 ± 3.67 | 11.83 (10.84–13.40) |
|
| 5-OCH3 | 54.90 ± 4.88 | 0.00 | 48.10 (44.97–51.55) |
|
| 5-F | 1.15 ± 0.00 | 0.00 | - c |
|
| 5-Cl | 100 | 59.17 ± 8.07 | 7.25 (5.92–8.48) |
|
| 5-Br | 100 | 49.86 ± 0.72 | 7.94 (6.34–9.50) |
|
| 5-NO2 | 97.37 ± 4.55 | 10.22 ± 2.19 | 26.78 (23.47–30.66) |
|
| 5-OH | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 5-NH2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 5-COOH | 33.05 ± 8.00 | 0.00 | 61.92 (52.62–79.08) |
|
| 5-CHO | 59.13 ± 3.23 | 0.00 | 45.37 (41.26–50.23) |
|
| 5-CN | 73.97 ± 1.09 | 1.15 ± 0.00 | 40.72 (38.75–42.68) |
|
| 5-Ac | 9.09 ± 3.66 | 0.00 | - |
|
| 5-OBz | 42.92 ± 3.66 | 0.00 | 53.03 (50.55–56.02) |
|
| 6-OCH3 | 47.64 ± 3.38 | 34.83 ± 1.47 | - |
|
| 6-Cl | 100 | 32.35 ± 2.11 | 12.36 (11.35–13.98) |
|
| 7-OCH3 | 84.25 ± 0.74 | 46.07 ± 0.61 | 28.03 (19.85–37.56) |
|
| 7-Cl | 100 | 53.49 ± 4.61 | 9.71 (9.11–10.47) |
a Values are the mean ± SD of three replicates. b 95% confidence interval. c not determined.
In vitro fungicidal activity of compounds 80–87. a
| Compound | R | Percentage Inhibition (%) | EC50 (95%CI c) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | |||
|
|
| 80.00 ± 1.21 | 40.45 ± 0.72 | 25.32 (13.57–40.45) |
|
|
| 83.15 ± 3.66 | 53.93 ± 1.97 | 9.21 (1.57–21.02) |
|
|
| 78.65 ± 0.38 | 49.44 ± 1.09 | 19.31 (4.96–32.77) |
|
|
| 56.18 ± 1.69 | 22.47 ± 1.79 | 48.63 (40.42–57.72) |
|
|
| 71.91 ± 3.27 | 44.94 ± 1.33 | 29.52 (11.04–59.41) |
|
| 4-F | 72.03 ± 2.10 | 63.32 ± 0.79 | 2.36 (0.23–8.25) |
|
| 4-Cl | 69.28 ± 0.79 | 61.48 ± 0.00 | 9.01 (2.85–19.81) |
|
| 5-Cl | 70.04 ± 0.73 | 65.82 ± 0.00 | 5.31 (3.08–13.34) |
a Values are the mean ± SD of three replicates. b 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2Detailed structure-activity relationships of indole compounds against R. solani.
In vivo protective activity against R. solani using detached leaf assay.
| Treatment | Concentration (μg/mL) | Lesion Length a (cm ± SE) | Control Efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 200 |
| |
| 100 |
| ||
| 50 |
| ||
|
| 200 |
| |
| 100 |
| ||
| 50 | 1.65 ± 1.20 ** | 79.50 | |
|
| 200 |
| |
| 100 |
| ||
| 50 | 0.43 ± 0.34 ** | 94.66 | |
|
| 200 |
| |
| 100 | 0.11 ± 0.12 ** | 98.63 | |
| 50 | 1.07 ± 0.67 ** | 86.71 | |
|
| 200 | 0.72 ± 0.49 ** | 91.05 |
| 100 | 1.80 ± 0.84 ** | 77.64 | |
| 50 | 2.41 ± 0.89 ** | 70.19 | |
|
| 200 | 0.15 ± 0.23 ** | 98.14 |
| 100 | 0.55 ± 0.35 ** | 93.17 | |
| 50 | 1.17 ± 0.91 ** | 87.95 | |
| validamycin A | 200 | 0 ** | 100 |
| 100 | 0 ** | 100 | |
| 50 | 0 ** | 100 | |
| control | 0 | 8.05 ± 1.01 |
** represents P < 0.01. a Values are the mean ± SD of 20 leaves.
Figure 3In vivo protective effect of selected compounds against R. solani using detached leaf assay.
In vivo protective and curative effects against R. solani using greenhouse experiment.
| Treatment | Conc. | Protective Effect | Curative Effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion Length a | Control Efficacy | Lesion Length | Control Efficacy | ||
|
| 200 |
|
| ||
| 100 |
|
| |||
|
| 200 | 1.05 ± 0.41 ** | 77.52 |
| |
|
| 200 |
| 1.15 ± 0.36 ** | 75.37 | |
| 100 |
| 1.48 ± 0.42 ** |
| ||
|
| 200 | 1.39 ± 0.71 ** | 70.23 | 1.95 ± 0.35 ** | 58.24 |
| 100 | 2.06 ± 0.56 ** | 55.89 | 3.62 ± 0.50 ** | 22.48 | |
| validamycin A | 200 | 0.99 ± 0.43 ** | 78.80 | 1.13 ± 0.51 ** | 75.80 |
| 100 | 1.60 ± 0.60 ** | 65.74 | 1.52 ± 0.64 ** | 67.45 | |
| control | 0 | 4.67 ± 0.97 | 4.67 ± 0.97 | ||
** represents P < 0.01. a Values are the mean ± SD of 20 plants.
Figure 4In vivo protective and curative activities of selected compounds against R. solani.
Figure 5SEM of R. solani hyphae treated with 0 (a,b) or 1 μg/mL 55 (c,d).
Figure 6TEM of R. solani hyphae treated without (a–e) or with 1 μg/mL 55 (f–k). (a) transverse of untreated hyphae, and many organelles were observed such as mitochondria (M) and vacuole (V); (b) cell wall (CW) of untreated hyphae; (c) mitochondria of untreated hyphae; (d) longitudinal of untreated hyphae, and spectra (S) and was uniform; (e) septal pore caps (SP) of untreated hyphae was visible; (f,g) transverse of 55-treated hyphae, and cell wall was thickening; (h) mitochondria of 55-treated hyphae was swollen; (i) longitudinal of 55-treated hyphae, and the septal pore caps disappeared; (j,k) longitudinal of 55-treated hyphae (loss of matrix in vacuoles and obvious vacuolization), and red arrow represented vacuolization.
Figure 7The mode of action of 55 against R. solani. (a,b) The intracellular ROS generation of the hyphae was detected by fluorescent micrographs using DCFH-DA staining; (c,d) The mitochondrial membrane potential of the hyphae was evaluated by fluorescent micrographs with Rhodamine 123 staining; (e,f) nuclear morphology of R. solani hyphae stained by Hoechst 33258.