| Literature DB >> 32153897 |
Rachelle Ghadieh1,2, Jocelyne Mattar Bou Mosleh1, Sibelle Al Hayek1,3, Samar Merhi1, Jessy El Hayek Fares1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of low vitamin D status and metabolic syndrome is increasing globally and in Lebanon. The objectives of this study are to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components (elevated triglycerides, low HDL, abdominal obesity defined by high waist circumference, hypertension, impaired fasting blood glucose) and investigate the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations and MetS and its components among a sample of Lebanese adults.Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Fasting blood glucose; Metabolic syndrome; Triglycerides; Vitamin D; Waist circumference
Year: 2018 PMID: 32153897 PMCID: PMC7050701 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-018-0243-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nutr ISSN: 2055-0928
Sample characteristics (socio-demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, dietary intake and biochemical factors) in employees of a private Lebanese university
| Characteristic | Total ( | Men ( | Women ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n or mean | % or SD | n or mean | % or SD | n or mean | % or SD | Significance | |
| Age (years) | 42.6 | 11.5 | 45.6 | 12.1 | 39.5 | 10.2 | 0.000 |
| Marital status | |||||||
| Single/ Separated/ Divorced | 119 | 34.6 | 53 | 30.8 | 66 | 38.4 | 0.174 |
| Married | 225 | 65.4 | 119 | 69.2 | 106 | 61.6 | |
| Education level | |||||||
| High school/BT1 | 75 | 21.8 | 48 | 27.9 a | 27 | 15.7 a | 0.013 |
| Bachelor degree | 87 | 25.3 | 36 | 20.9 b | 51 | 29.6 b | |
| Graduate | 182 | 52.9 | 88 | 51.2 a,b | 94 | 54.7 a,b | |
| Income ($) | |||||||
| < 2250 | 112 | 32.6 | 61 | 35.5 a | 51 | 29.6 a | 0.033 |
| 2250–4000 | 87 | 25.3 | 33 | 19.2 a | 54 | 31.4 b | |
| > 4000 | 145 | 42.2 | 78 | 45.3 a | 67 | 39.0 a | |
| Medical morbidity | |||||||
| No | 202 | 58.9 | 91 | 53.2 | 111 | 64.5 | 0.043 |
| Yes | 141 | 41.1 | 80 | 46.8 | 61 | 35.5 | |
| Intake of vitamin D supplement, past 3 months | |||||||
| No | 270 | 78.5 | 142 | 82.6 | 128 | 74.4 | 0.088 |
| Yes | 74 | 21.5 | 30 | 17.4 | 44 | 25.6 | |
| Intake of other supplement, past 3 months | |||||||
| No | 252 | 73.3 | 133 | 77.3 | 119 | 69.2 | 0.113 |
| Yes | 92 | 26.7 | 39 | 22.7 | 53 | 30.8 | |
| Daily exposure to direct sunlight | 0.008 | ||||||
| ≤ 15 mins | 136 | 39.5 | 66 | 38.4 a | 70 | 40.7 a | |
| 16–60 min | 112 | 32.6 | 46 | 26.7 a | 66 | 38.4 b | |
| > 60 mins | 96 | 27.9 | 60 | 34.9 a | 36 | 20.9 b | |
| Use sunscreen | |||||||
| No | 244 | 70.9 | 165 | 95.9 | 79 | 45.9 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 100 | 29.1 | 7 | 4.1 | 93 | 54.1 | |
| Smoking | |||||||
| No | 212 | 61.6 | 93 | 54.1 | 119 | 69.2 | 0.006 |
| Yes | 132 | 38.4 | 79 | 45.9 | 53 | 30.8 | |
| Alcohol drinking | |||||||
| No | 255 | 74.1 | 112 | 65.1 | 143 | 83.1 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 89 | 25.9 | 60 | 34.9 | 29 | 16.9 | |
| Physical activity level | |||||||
| Low | 221 | 64.2 | 10.3 | 59.9 | 118 | 68.6 | 0.115 |
| Moderate/High | 123 | 35.8 | 69.0 | 40.1 | 54.0 | 31.4 | |
| Vitamin D intake (μg) | 2.24 | 3.18 | 2.46 | 4.0 | 2.03 | 2.04 | 0.209 |
| Vitamin D concentration (ng/mL) | 28.2 | 13.9 | 28.4 | 15.0 | 28.1 | 12.8 | 0.846 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||
| Underweight | 2 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 a,b | 2 | 1.2 a,b | 0.000 |
| Normal | 122 | 35.5 | 27 | 15.7 a | 95 | 55.2 b | |
| Overweight | 130 | 37.8 | 86 | 50.0 a | 44 | 25.6 b | |
| Obese | 90 | 26.2 | 59 | 34.3 a | 31 | 18.0 b | |
| Percent body fat (%) | 30.90 | 7.899 | 27.796 | 6.930 | 33.973 | 7.608 | 0.000 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 96.5 | 12.2 | 102.1 | 10.5 | 90.9 | 11.1 | 0.000 |
| MetS2 status | |||||||
| No | 263 | 76.5 | 113 | 65.7 | 150 | 87.2 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 81 | 23.5 | 59 | 34.3 | 22 | 12.8 | |
| Waist circumference risky | |||||||
| No3 | 170 | 49.4 | 85 | 49.4 | 85 | 49.4 | 1 |
| Yes | 174 | 50.6 | 87 | 50.6 | 87 | 50.6 | |
| Blood pressure | |||||||
| Healthy | 271 | 78.8 | 116 | 67.4 | 155 | 90.1 | 0.000 |
| Unhealthy4 | 73 | 21.2 | 56 | 32.6 | 17 | 9.9 | |
| Fasting blood glucose | |||||||
| Normal | 274 | 79.7 | 119 | 69.2 | 155 | 90.1 | 0.000 |
| Impaired5 | 70 | 20.3 | 53 | 30.8 | 17 | 9.9 | |
| TG levels | |||||||
| Normal TG levels | 232 | 67.4 | 88 | 51.1 | 144 | 83.7 | 0.000 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia6 | 112 | 32.6 | 84 | 48.8 | 28 | 16.3 | |
| HDL | |||||||
| Normal | 262 | 76.2 | 129 | 75 | 133 | 77.3 | 0.704 |
| Low7 | 82 | 23.8 | 43 | 25 | 39 | 22.7 | |
1Baccalaureat Technique
2Metabolic Syndrome defined according the NCEP-ATP III [63]
3WC < 88 cm for women and < 102 cm for men [27]
4blood pressure ≥ 130/ 85 mmHg [63]
5fasting blood glucose ≥100 mg/Dl [63]
6triglycerides level ≥ 150 mg/dL [63]
7HDL cholesterol levels< 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/ dL in women [63]
Columns with superscripts without a common symbol differ, P < 0.05
Association of socio-demographic, anthropometric and lifestyle factors with metabolic syndrome in employees of a private Lebanese university
| Characteristic | Total ( | Men ( | Women ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No MetS | MetS1 | No MetS | MetS | No MetS | MetS | ||||
| mean ± SD or n(%) | mean ± SD or n(%) | mean ± SD or n(%) | |||||||
| Age (years) | 40.6 ± 11.3 | 49.0 ± 9.7 | 0.000 | 43.3 ± 12.5 | 49.9 ± 10.0 | 0.000 | 38.5 ± 10.0 | 46.7 ± 8.6 | 0.000 |
| Marital status | 0.227 | 0.813 | 0.362 | ||||||
| Single/ Separated/ Divorced | 96 (80.7%) | 23 (19.3%) | 36 (67.9%) | 17 (32.1%) | 60 (90.9%) | 6 (9.1%) | |||
| Married | 167 (74.2%) | 58 (25.8%) | 77 (64.7%) | 42 (35.3%) | 90 (84.9%) | 16 (15.1%) | |||
| Education level | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.143 | ||||||
| High school / BT2 | 46 (61.3%) a | 29 (38.7%) a | 24 (50.0%) a | 24 (50.0%) a | 22 (81.5%) | 5 (18.5%) | |||
| Bachelor degree | 69 (79.3%) b | 18 (20.7%) b | 27 (75.0%) b | 9 (25.0%) b | 42 (82.4%) | 9 (17.6%) | |||
| Graduate | 148(81.3%) b | 34 (18.7%) b | 62 (70.5%) b | 26 (29.5%) b | 86 (91.5%) | 8 (8.5%) | |||
| Income ($) | 0.001 | 0.023 | 0.168 | ||||||
| < 2250 | 73 (65.2%) a | 39 (34.8%) a | 32 (52.5%) a | 29 (47.5%) a | 41 (80.4%) | 10 (19.6%) | |||
| 2250–4000 | 75 (86.2%) b | 12 (13.8%) b | 25 (75.8%) b | 8 (24.2%) b | 50 (92.6%) | 4 (7.4%) | |||
| > 4000 | 115 (79.3%) b | 30 (20.7%) b | 56 (71.8%) b | 22 (28.2%) b | 59 (88.1%) | 8 (11.9%) | |||
| Medical morbidity | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.000 | ||||||
| No | 174 (86.1%) | 28 (13.9%) | 69 (75.8%) | 22 (24.2%) | 105 (94.6%) | 6 (5.4%) | |||
| Yes | 88 (62.4%) | 53 (37.6%) | 43 (53.8%) | 37 (46.2%) | 45 (73.8%) | 16 (26.2%) | |||
| Smoking | 0.006 | 0.039 | 0.622 | ||||||
| No | 173 (81.6%) | 39 (18.4%) | 68 (73.1%) | 25 (26.9%) | 105 (88.2%) | 14 (11.8%) | |||
| Yes | 90 (68.2%) | 42 (31.8%) | 45 (57.0%) | 34 (43.0%) | 45 (84.9%) | 8 (15.1%) | |||
| Alcohol drinking | 0.654 | 1 | 0.377 | ||||||
| No | 197 (77.3%) | 58 (22.7%) | 74 (66.1%) | 38 (33.9%) | 123 (86.0%) | 20 (14.0%) | |||
| Yes | 66 (74.2%) | 23 (25.8%) | 39 (65.0%) | 21 (35.0%) | 27 (93.1%) | 2 (6.9%) | |||
| Physical activity level | 0.698 | 0.477 | 0.841 | ||||||
| Low | 167 (75.6%) | 54 (24.4%) | 65 (63.1%) | 38 (36.9%) | 102 (86.4%) | 16 (13.6%) | |||
| Moderate/High | 96 (78.0%) | 27 (22.0%) | 48 (69.6%) | 21 (30.4%) | 48 (88.9%) | 6 (11.1%) | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Underweight | 2 (100.0%) a,b,c | 0 (0.0%) a,b,c | – | – | 2 (100.0%) a,b,c | 0 (0.0%) a,b,c | |||
| Normal | 122 (100.0%) c | 0 (0.0%) c | 27 (100%) a | 0 (0.0%) a | 95 (100.0%) c | 0 (0.0%) c | |||
| Overweight | 101 (77.7%) b | 29 (22.3%) b | 63 (73.3%) b | 23 (26.7%) b | 38 (86.4%) b | 6 (13.6%) b | |||
| Obese | 38 (42.2%) a | 52 (57.8%) a | 23 (39.0%) c | 36 (61.0%) c | 15 (48.4%) a | 16 (51.6%) a | |||
1Metabolic Syndrome defined according the NCEP-ATP III [63]
2Baccalaureat Technique
Columns with superscripts without a common symbol differ, P < 0.05
Associations between vitamin D status and the metabolic syndrome in employees of a private Lebanese university
| Vitamin D Status as defined by the Institute of Medicine (Inadequate: < 20 ng/mL; Adequate: ≥ 20 ng/mL) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Men ( | Women ( | |||||||
| Vitamin D Status | Adequate | Inadequate | Adequate | Inadequate | Adequate | Inadequate | |||
| mean ± SD or n(%) | mean ± SD or n(%) | mean ± SD or n(%) | |||||||
| MetS1 status | 0.010 | 0.174 | 0.021 | ||||||
| No | 135 (66.5%) | 68 (33.5%) | 60 (65.2%) | 32 (34.8%) | 75 (67.6%) | 36 (32.4%) | |||
| Yes | 31 (47.7%) | 34 (52.3%) | 26 (52.0) | 24 (48.0%) | 5 (33.3%) | 10 (66.7%) | |||
| Waist circumference risky (cm) | 0.139 | 0.606 | 0.153 | ||||||
| No2 | 90 (66.7%) | 45 (33.3%) | 45 (63.4%) | 26 (36.6%) | 45 (70.3%) | 19 (29.7%) | |||
| Yes | 76 (57.1%) | 57 (42.9%) | 41 (57.7%) | 30 (42.3%) | 35 (56.5%) | 27 (43.5%) | |||
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.269 | 0.949 | 0.097 | ||||||
| Healthy | 133 (63.9%) | 75 (36.1%) | 57 (61.3%) | 36 (38.7%) | 76 (66.1%) | 39 (33.9%) | |||
| Unhealthy3 | 33 (55.0%) | 27 (45.0%) | 29 (59.2%) | 20 (40.8%) | 4 (36.4%) | 7 (63.6%) | |||
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | 0.675 | 0.725 | 1 | ||||||
| Normal | 135 (62.8%) | 80 (37.2%) | 62 (62.0%) | 38 (38.0%) | 73 (63.5%) | 42 (36.5%) | |||
| Impaired4 | 31 (58.5%) | 22 (41.5%) | 24 (57.1%) | 18 (42.9%) | 7 (63.6%) | 4 (36.4%) | |||
| TG levels (mg/dL) | 0.014 | 0.093 | 0.078 | ||||||
| Normal TG levels | 120 (67.4%) | 58 (32.6%) | 49 (68.1%) | 23 (31.9%) | 71 (67.0%) | 35 (33.0%) | |||
| Hypertriglyceridemia5 | 46 (51.1%) | 44 (48.9%) | 37 (52.9%) | 33 (47.1%) | 9 (45.0%) | 11 (55.0%) | |||
| HDL (mg/dL) | 0.146 | 0.782 | 0.074 | ||||||
| Normal | 130 (64.7%) | 71 (35.3%) | 63 (61.8%) | 39 (38.2%) | 67 (67.7%) | 32 (32.3%) | |||
| Low6 | 36 (53.7%) | 31 (46.3%) | 23(57.5%) | 17 (42.5%) | 13 (48.1%) | 14 (51.9%) | |||
aSample excluded participants taking vitamin D supplements (n = 76)
1Metabolic Syndrome defined according the NCEP-ATP III [63]
2WC < 88 cm for women or < 102 cm for men [27]
3blood pressure ≥ 130/ 85 mmHg [63]
4fasting blood glucose ≥100 mg/dL [63]
5triglycerides level ≥ 150 mg/dL [63]
6HDL cholesterol levels< 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/ dL in women [63]
Logistic regression for metabolic syndrome and vitamin D status using the Institute of Medicinea Cutoffs among employees in a private Lebanese university
| Odds Ratio (OR) | 95% C.I | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Vitamin D status | 2.496 | 1.315 | 4.736 | 0.005 |
| Age, years | 1.052 | 1.022 | 1.083 | 0.001 |
| Annual income | 0.756 | 0.591 | 0.969 | 0.027 |
| Gender | 0.080 | 0.033 | 0.189 | < 0.001 |
| Body fat percentage | 1.180 | 1.118 | 1.245 | < 0.001 |
aVitamin D status defined as Adequate: 25hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 20 ng/mL and inadequate: 25 hydroxyvitamin D < 20 ng/mL
Model statistics: R2 = 42.5%, Omnibus test p < 0.001, Hosmer Lemeshow test p = 0.264
Logistic regression for components of MetS (hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL) and vitamin D status using the Institute of Medicinea cutoffs among employees in a private Lebanese university
| Odds Ratio (OR) | 95% C.I | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Hypertriglyceridemia1 | ||||
| Vitamin D status | 2.383 | 1.357 | 4.184 | .002 |
| BMI kg/m2 | 2.683 | 1.843 | 3.908 | .000 |
| Age, years | 1.046 | 1.021 | 1.072 | .000 |
| Gender | .358 | .205 | .625 | .000 |
| Low HDL2 | ||||
| Education | .691 | .507 | .942 | .019 |
| Smoking | 2.117 | 1.256 | 3.571 | .005 |
| Vitamin D status | 1.783 | 1.050 | 3.029 | .032 |
aVitamin D status defined as Adequate: 25hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 20 ng/mL and inadequate: 25 hydroxyvitamin D < 20 ng/mL
1triglycerides level ≥ 150 mg/dL [63]
Model statistics: R2 = 36.3%, Omnibus test p < 0.001, Hosmer Lemeshow test p = 0.156
2HDL cholesterol levels< 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/ dL in women [63]
Model statistics: R2 = 8.7%, Omnibus test p < 0.001, Hosmer Lemeshow test p = 0.717