| Literature DB >> 32153802 |
Han Byul Jang1, Min-Kyu Choi2, Jae Heon Kang3, Sang Ick Park1, Hye-Ja Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiota has emerged as an important environmental factor associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, through its interactions with dietary factors. Therefore, we analyzed the composition of the fecal microbiota and levels of biochemical markers related to metabolic disease according to dietary pattern in Korean adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary patterns; Gut microbiota; Metabolic syndrome
Year: 2017 PMID: 32153802 PMCID: PMC7050889 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-016-0125-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nutr ISSN: 2055-0928
Factor loading matrix for the two major dietary patterns
| Food groups | Dietary pattern factors | |
|---|---|---|
| Factor1 | Factor2 | |
| White rice | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Whole grains | 0.35 | |
| Noodle | −0.50 | |
| Cereal | ||
| Flour and bread | −0.59 | |
| Cookie, cracker and chip | −0.46 | |
| Instant products | −0.47 | |
| Fast Food | −0.36 | |
| Potatoes | 0.31 | |
| Sweet potatoes | 0.29 | |
| Sweet | 0.32 | |
| Legumes | −0.26 | |
| Nuts and Seeds | 0.37 | |
| Vegetables | 0.66 | |
| Mushroom | ||
| Fruits | −0.26 | |
| Red meats | 0.21 | |
| Poultry | −0.42 | |
| Meat products | ||
| Eggs | −0.30 | |
| Fish | 0.26 | |
| Shellfish | 0.25 | |
| Seaweeds | 0.28 | |
| Milks and ice cream | −0.30 | −0.34 |
| Yoghurt and cheese | −0.28 | |
| Oils | 0.53 | |
| Fats | −0.41 | 0.37 |
| Carbonated beverage | −0.27 | |
| Beverages | ||
| Oriental sauce | 0.72 | |
| Seasonings | −0.24 | 0.62 |
Absolute values < 0.2 are not presented in the table for simplicity
Classification of subjects by cluster analysis using factor scores
| Cluster1 | Cluster2 | |
|---|---|---|
| (Traditional diet) | (Modified Western diet) | |
| Factor1 | 0.37 ± 0.67 | −1.01 ± 1.06 |
| Factor2 | −0.30 ± 0.87 | 0.82 ± 0.89 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D
General chacteristics of subject according to dietary patten groups
| Traditional diet | Modified Western diet |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 13.9 ± 0.6 | 13.8 ± 0.7 | 0.2893 |
| Male (n, %) | 45 (54.9%) | 19 (63.3%) | 0.4233b |
| Height (cm) | 164.7 ± 7.4 | 164.8 ± 7.3 | 0.8236 |
| Weight (kg) | 70.9 ± 24.6 | 90.1 ± 18.2 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 7.9 | 33.1 ± 5.8 | <0.0001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 82.8 ± 20.3 | 100.4 ± 15.3 | <0.0001 |
| Fat percent (%) | 30.9 ± 13.9 | 42.8 ± 10.7 | <0.0001 |
| Fat mass (g) | 24.6 ± 17.9 | 40.0 ± 13.5 | <0.0001 |
| AST (IU/L) | 23.3 ± 10.7 | 31.7 ± 18.1 | 0.0048 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 24.6 ± 26.8 | 47.2 ± 41.6 | 0.0016 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 92.6 ± 6.4 | 94.6 ± 10.3 | 0.2269 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL)c | 99.1 ± 70.3 | 127.0 ± 63.9 | 0.0098 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 163 ± 28.7 | 179.9 ± 29.1 | 0.0024 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 50.0 ± 9.5 | 47.3 ± 10.2 | 0.1853 |
| hs-CRPc | 0.14 ± 0.14 | 0.35 ± 0.44 | 0.0002 |
| Insulinc | 17.4 ± 12.8 | 28.0 ± 31.1 | 0.0043 |
| HOMA-IRc | 4.0 ± 3.0 | 6.7 ± 8.0 | 0.0039 |
| Obesity (n, %)d | 32 (39.0%) | 26 (86.7%) | <0.0001b |
| Metabolic syndrome (n, %)) | 14 (17.3%) | 11 (36.7%) | 0.0299b |
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D or n (%)
a P value was calculated by generlized linear regression analysis with age, sex and energy intakes
b P value was obtained by Chi-squre test
cData are log transformed prior to analysis
dObesity was defined as those with a BMI ≥95th percentile or ≥25 kg/m2
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance
List of taxa showing different abundance between dietary patten groups
| Traditional diet | Modified Western diet | P-valuea (unadjusted) | P-value (FDR adjusted) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (median) | (median) | |||
| Genus levels | ||||
|
| 44.53 | 16.58 | 0.046 | 0.110 |
|
| 0.03 | 41.26 | 0.015 | 0.090 |
|
| 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.026 | 0.104 |
|
| 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.046 | 0.110 |
|
| 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.011 | 0.090 |
| Family levels | ||||
|
| 44.53 | 16.58 | 0.046 | 0.129 |
|
| 0.20 | 41.98 | 0.047 | 0.129 |
|
| 7.50 | 3.86 | 0.047 | 0.129 |
|
| 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.012 | 0.129 |
| Phylum levels | ||||
|
| 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.020 | 0.100 |
a P-value was obtained from the Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Fig. 1Association of clusters with abundant microbiota in family and genus levels. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess the association of clusters with microbiota (P < 0.05). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles with a line at the median
Association between fecal microbiota and risk of obesity with and without metabolic syndrome
| Taxa | Obesity without MS |
| Obesity with MS |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | |||
| Genus levels | ||||||
|
| 0.973 | (0.957-0.990) | 0.002 | 0.965 | (0.946-0.985) | 0.001 |
|
| 1.018 | (1.004-1.032) | 0.011 | 1.025 | (1.009-1.040) | 0.002 |
|
| 0.692 | (0.391-1.227) | 0.208 | 1.088 | (0.822-1.440) | 0.556 |
|
| 1.018 | (0.740-1.400) | 0.915 | 0.844 | (0.545-1.308) | 0.449 |
|
| 1.331 | (0.510-3.474) | 0.559 | 0.400 | (0.074-2.163) | 0.287 |
| Family levels | ||||||
|
| 0.973 | (0.957-0.990) | 0.002 | 0.965 | (0.946-0.985) | 0.001 |
|
| 1.018 | (1.004-1.032) | 0.011 | 1.024 | (1.009-1.040) | 0.002 |
|
| 0.973 | 0.885-0.994) | 0.030 | 0.973 | (0.935-1.013) | 0.184 |
|
| 1.330 | (0.509-3.471) | 0.560 | 0.400 | (0.074-2.161) | 0.287 |
| Phylum levels | ||||||
|
| 1.171 | (0.561-2.446) | 0.674 | 0.646 | (0.220-1.895) | 0.426 |
P value of logistic regression with adjustment for age and sex
Fig. 2Spearman’s correlations between dietary intakes and microbial taxa. Columns correspond to bacterial taxa showing a significant difference in abundance according to dietary pattern group; rows correspond to a age, sex BMI-adjusted intakes of food items and b age, sex, energy and BMI-adjusted nutrients intakes (* adj P < 0.05) Columns and rows are cluster by hierarchical method