Literature DB >> 32153314

Stochastic multistationarity in a model of the hematopoietic stem cell differentiation network.

M Ali Al-Radhawi1,2, Nithin S Kumar1, Eduardo D Sontag2, Domitilla Del Vecchio1.   

Abstract

A central issue in the analysis of multi-stable systems is that of controlling the relative size of the basins of attraction of alternative states through suitable choices of system parameters. We are interested here mainly in the stochastic version of this problem, that of shaping the stationary probability distribution of a Markov chain so that various alternative modes become more likely than others. Although many of our results are more general, we were motivated by an important biological question, that of cell differentiation. In the mathematical modeling of cell differentiation, it is common to think of internal states of cells (quanfitied by activation levels of certain genes) as determining the different cell types. Specifically, we study here the "PU.1/GATA-1 circuit" which is involved in the control of the development of mature blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). All mature, specialized blood cells have been shown to be derived from multipotent HSCs. Our first contribution is to introduce a rigorous chemical reaction network model of the PU.1/GATA-1 circuit, which incorporates current biological knowledge. We then find that the resulting ODE model of these biomolecular reactions is incapable of exhibiting multistability, contradicting the fact that differentiation networks have, by definition, alternative stable steady states. When considering instead the stochastic version of this chemical network, we analytically construct the stationary distribution, and are able to show that this distribution is indeed capable of admitting a multiplicity of modes. Finally, we study how a judicious choice of system parameters serves to bias the probabilities towards different stationary states. We remark that certain changes in system parameters can be physically implemented by a biological feedback mechanism; tuning this feedback gives extra degrees of freedom that allow one to assign higher likelihood to some cell types over others.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32153314      PMCID: PMC7062292          DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2018.8619300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control        ISSN: 0743-1546


  38 in total

1.  A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages.

Authors:  K Akashi; D Traver; T Miyamoto; I L Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding.

Authors:  P Zhang; X Zhang; A Iwama; C Yu; K A Smith; B U Mueller; S Narravula; B E Torbett; S H Orkin; D G Tenen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell fate.

Authors:  Diane S Krause
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-05-13       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Sui Huang; Gabriel Eichler; Yaneer Bar-Yam; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Molecular analysis of the interaction between the hematopoietic master transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1.

Authors:  Chu Wai Liew; Kasper D Rand; Raina J Y Simpson; Wendy W Yung; Robyn E Mansfield; Merlin Crossley; Mette Proetorius-Ibba; Claus Nerlov; Flemming M Poulsen; Joel P Mackay
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Michael A Rieger; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1.

Authors:  P Zhang; G Behre; J Pan; A Iwama; N Wara-Aswapati; H S Radomska; P E Auron; D G Tenen; Z Sun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate.

Authors:  Stella T Chou; Eugene Khandros; L Charles Bailey; Kim E Nichols; Christopher R Vakoc; Yu Yao; Zan Huang; John D Crispino; Ross C Hardison; Gerd A Blobel; Mitchell J Weiss
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Self-association of Gata1 enhances transcriptional activity in vivo in zebra fish embryos.

Authors:  Keizo Nishikawa; Makoto Kobayashi; Atsuko Masumi; Susan E Lyons; Brant M Weinstein; P Paul Liu; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells.

Authors:  Sui Huang; Yan-Ping Guo; Gillian May; Tariq Enver
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.