| Literature DB >> 32149147 |
Yangyang Li1, Yongfeng Zhang2, Weiqi Meng2, Yutong Li1, Tao Huang3, Di Wang2, Min Hu1.
Abstract
Yishen Bugu Ye (<span class="Chemical">YSBGY), a traditional Chinese medicine comprising 12 types of medicinal herbs, is often prescribed in China to increase bone strength. In this study, the <span class="Disease">antiosteoporotic effects of YSBGY were investigated in C57BL/6 mice afflicted with dexamethasone- (Dex-) induced osteoporosis (OP). The results showed that YSBGY reduced the interstitial edema in the liver and kidney of mice with Dex-induced OP. It also increased the number of trabecular bone elements and chondrocytes in the femur, promoted cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density, and modulated the OP-related indexes in the femur and tibia of OP mice. It also increased the serum concentrations of type I collagen, osteocalcin, osteopontin, bone morphogenetic protein-2, bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, and runt-related transcription factor-2 and reduced those of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 and nuclear factor of activated T cells in these mice, suggesting that it improved osteoblast differentiation and suppressed osteoclast differentiation. The anti-inflammatory effect of YSBGY was confirmed by the increase in the serum concentrations of interleukin- (IL-) 33 and the decrease in concentrations of IL-1, IL-7, and tumor necrosis factor-α in OP mice. Furthermore, YSBGY enhanced the serum concentrations of superoxide dismutase and catalase in these mice, indicating that it also exerted antioxidative effects. This is the first study to confirm the antiosteoporotic effects of YSBGY in mice with Dex-induced OP, and it showed that these effects may be related to the YSBGY-induced modulation of the osteoblast/osteoclast balance and serum concentrations of inflammatory factors. These results provide experimental evidence supporting the use of YSBGY for supporting bone formation in the clinical setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32149147 PMCID: PMC7054773 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9467683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Effects of YSBGY on the body weight and organ indexes of OP mice.
| Days | CTRL | Dex (30 mg/kg) | YSBGY (10 mL/kg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | E2 (15 | YSBGY (mL/kg) | |||||
| 5 | 10 | ||||||
| Body weight (g) | 0 day | 22.3 ± 0.3 | 22.7 ± 0.2 | 22.5 ± 0.3 | 22.2 ± 0.3 | 22.6 ± 0.2 | 22.8 ± 0.3 |
| 7th day | 23.2 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.1### | 22.0 ± 0.2 | 21.9 ± 0.2 | 21.8 ± 0.2 | 22.7 ± 0.3 | |
| 14th day | 23.5 ± 0.4 | 21.9 ± 0.3### | 21.9 ± 0.2 | 21.3 ± 0.2 | 21.7 ± 0.2 | 23.7 ± 0.4 | |
| 21st day | 24.2 ± 0.3 | 22.2 ± 0.2### | 22.4 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.2 | 22.2 ± 0.2 | 24.4 ± 0.4 | |
| 28th day | 24.5 ± 0.3 | 21.8 ± 0.2### | 22.0 ± 0.3 | 21.6 ± 0.3 | 21.7 ± 0.2 | 24.7 ± 0.4 | |
| 35th day | 25.1 ± 0.3 | 21.3 ± 0.4### | 21.1 ± 0.2 | 20.8 ± 0.4 | 21.4 ± 0.2 | 24.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 42nd day | 25.8 ± 0.3 | 21.8 ± 0.4### | 21.6 ± 0.2 | 21.2 ± 0.2 | 21.4 ± 0.2 | 25.4 ± 0.5 | |
| 49th day | 26.6 ± 0.4 | 21.9 ± 0.2### | 21.9 ± 0.2 | 21.6 ± 0.2 | 21.4 ± 0.2 | 25.7 ± 0.5 | |
|
| |||||||
| Organ index (%) | Liver | 4.88 ± 0.15 | 7.87 ± 0.14### | 7.50 ± 0.08 | 7.44 ± 0.11 | 7.32 ± 0.12∗ | 4.78 ± 0.19 |
| Spleen | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01### | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.03∗ | 0.31 ± 0.01 | |
| Kidney | 1.59 ± 0.06 | 1.57 ± 0.02 | 1.59 ± 0.02 | 1.53 ± 0.03 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | 1.49 ± 0.06 | |
| Thymus | 0.221 ± 0.017 | 0.066 ± 0.009### | 0.077 ± 0.007 | 0.061 ± 0.005 | 0.056 ± 0.006 | 0.201 ± 0.014 | |
The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and expressed as means ± SEM (n = 15). ###P < 0.001vs. control mice; ∗P < 0.05vs. OP mice.
Figure 1Effects of YSBGY on the structures of the liver, spleen, and kidney of OP mice visualized by H&E staining (n = 6; 200x, scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 2Effects of YSBGY on the histological changes in the femur of OP mice visualized by (a) H&E staining and (b) Giemsa staining (n = 6; 40x, scale bar: 200 μm).
Figure 3YSBGY-induced protection against OP revealed by the bone morphological changes and osteoporotic indexes of the femur in OP mice. (a) Micro-CT images of the femur in OP mice. (b) 3D reconstructed images of the trabecular bone in the femur of OP mice. The (c) BMD, (d) BV/TV, (e) BS/BV, (f) Tb.Sp, (g) Tb.Th, and (h) Tb.N of the femur in all groups. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001vs. control mice; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001vs. OP mice.
Figure 4YSBGY-induced protection against OP revealed by the bone morphological changes and the osteoporotic indexes of the tibia in OP mice. (a) Micro-CT images of the tibia in OP mice. (b) 3D reconstructed images of the trabecular bone in the tibia of OP mice. The (c) BMD, (d) BV/TV, (e) BS/BV, (f) Tb.Sp, (g) Tb.Th, and (h) Tb.N of the tibia in all groups. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001vs. control mice; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001vs. OP mice.
Figure 5Regulation of the serum levels of inflammatory cytokines in OP mice by YSBGY. YSBGY reduced the serum levels of (a) IL-1, (b) IL-7, and (d) TNF-α and increased those of (c) IL-33, (e) CAT, and (f) SOD in OP mice. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 10) and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. #P < 0.05vs. control mice; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001vs. OP mice.
Effects of YSBGY on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation-related factors in the peripheral blood of OP mice.
| Groups | CTRL | Dex (30 mg/kg) | YSBGY (10 mL/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | E2 (15 | YSBGY (mL/kg) | ||||
| 5 | 10 | |||||
| Collagen I (ng/mL) | 14.0 ± 0.7 | 10.9 ± 0.7## | 13.5 ± 0.8∗ | 12.1 ± 0.8 | 13.3 ± 0.8∗ | 12.7 ± 0.7 |
| BGP OCN (ng/mL) | 4.30 ± 0.16 | 3.82 ± 0.06# | 4.46±0.14∗∗ | 4.34±0.09∗∗ | 4.62±0.14∗∗ | 4.69 ± 0.10 |
| OPN (ng/mL) | 109.2 ± 3.4 | 94.7 ± 5.6# | 118.4±5.4∗∗ | 119.8 ± 7.3∗ | 121.0±4.0∗∗ | 122.5 ± 5.0 |
| BMP-2 (ng/mL) | 9.60 ± 0.19 | 8.76 ± 0.21# | 9.84 ± 0.33∗ | 9.89 ± 0.31∗ | 10.41±0.34∗∗ | 11.38 ± 1.50 |
| BMPR-2 (ng/mL) | 3.83 ± 0.12 | 3.41 ± 0.12# | 4.21 ± 0.29∗ | 4.10±0.17∗∗ | 4.49±0.13∗∗∗ | 4.42 ± 0.59 |
| TRACP-5 | 3.85 ± 0.15 | 4.61 ± 0.26# | 3.86 ± 0.10∗ | 3.54±0.16∗∗ | 3.85 ± 0.18∗ | 3.63 ± 0.08 |
| CTX-1 (ng/mL) | 4.73 ± 0.24 | 3.84 ± 0.22# | 4.65 ± 0.29∗ | 6.31±0.15∗∗∗ | 5.50±0.30∗∗∗ | 4.74 ± 0.27 |
The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and expressed as means ± SEM (n = 10). #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01vs. control mice; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001vs. OP mice.
Figure 6Regulation of the concentrations of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation-related proteins in the femur and tibia tissues of OP mice by YSBGY. YSBGY increased the concentrations of osteoblast differentiation-related proteins, including COL-I, Runx2, OCN, OPN, and BMP-2, and decreased those of osteoclast differentiation-proteins, including TRAP5 and NFATc1, in the femur and tibia tissues of OP mice. The protein concentrations were normalized to β-actin and total protein concentrations. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. ###P < 0.001vs. control mice; ∗∗∗P < 0.001vs. OP mice.