Carly E A Barbon1,2, Catriona M Steele1,2. 1. Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, 12th floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada. 2. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of thickened liquids has become one of the most common management strategies for individuals with dysphagia. The purpose of this paper is to review methods that can be used to measure the flow characteristics of liquids used in dysphagia management. We describe the measurement of apparent viscosity, measures of extensional flow, slump tests (specifically the line-spread test and Bostwick consistometry), gravity flow tests, and subjective methods. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss the relationship between different approaches to measuring flow, the 2002 American National Dysphagia Diet and the 2017 International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) framework. A comparison of test results across four methods is provided. SUMMARY: A consistent approach is needed for the measurement of flow for thickened liquids used in dysphagia management. This review highlights differences that can be expected across different flow testing methodologies. Adherence to a common method and measurement definitions will promote patient safety and facilitate future research regarding the effectiveness of texture modification as an intervention for dysphagia.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of thickened liquids has become one of the most common management strategies for individuals with dysphagia. The purpose of this paper is to review methods that can be used to measure the flow characteristics of liquids used in dysphagia management. We describe the measurement of apparent viscosity, measures of extensional flow, slump tests (specifically the line-spread test and Bostwick consistometry), gravity flow tests, and subjective methods. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss the relationship between different approaches to measuring flow, the 2002 American National Dysphagia Diet and the 2017 International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) framework. A comparison of test results across four methods is provided. SUMMARY: A consistent approach is needed for the measurement of flow for thickened liquids used in dysphagia management. This review highlights differences that can be expected across different flow testing methodologies. Adherence to a common method and measurement definitions will promote patient safety and facilitate future research regarding the effectiveness of texture modification as an intervention for dysphagia.
Authors: JoAnne Robbins; Gary Gensler; Jacqueline Hind; Jeri A Logemann; Anne S Lindblad; Diane Brandt; Herbert Baum; David Lilienfeld; Steven Kosek; Donna Lundy; Karen Dikeman; Marta Kazandjian; Gary D Gramigna; Susan McGarvey-Toler; Patricia J Miller Gardner Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julie A Y Cichero; Catriona Steele; Janice Duivestein; Pere Clavé; Jianshe Chen; Jun Kayashita; Roberto Dantas; Caroline Lecko; Renee Speyer; Peter Lam; Joseph Murray Journal: Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep Date: 2013-08-24
Authors: Julie A Y Cichero; Peter Lam; Catriona M Steele; Ben Hanson; Jianshe Chen; Roberto O Dantas; Janice Duivestein; Jun Kayashita; Caroline Lecko; Joseph Murray; Mershen Pillay; Luis Riquelme; Soenke Stanschus Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Dele Raheem; Conrado Carrascosa; Fernando Ramos; Ariana Saraiva; António Raposo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Francesca Cuomo; Martina Angelicola; Elisa De Arcangelis; Francesco Lopez; Maria Cristina Messia; Emanuele Marconi Journal: Foods Date: 2021-03-19