Literature DB >> 32146248

The psychiatric impact of the novel coronavirus outbreak.

Poliana Moreira de Medeiros Carvalho1, Marcial Moreno Moreira2, Matheus Nogueira Arcanjo de Oliveira3, José Marcondes Macedo Landim1, Modesto Leite Rolim Neto4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146248      PMCID: PMC7133679          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


× No keyword cloud information.
Patients with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV (new coronavirus disease) may experience fear of the consequences of being infected with a potentially fatal new virus, and those in quarantine might experience boredom, loneliness, and anger. Furthermore, infection symptoms, such as fever, hypoxia and cough, as well as adverse effects of treatment, such as insomnia caused by corticosteroids, could lead to anxiety worsening and mental distress (Xiang et al., 2020). The psychological impact of stressful events related to an infectious disease outbreak may be mediated by peoples’ perceptions (Wu et al., 2009). Maunder et al., (2003) and Folkman and Greer (2000) observed that timely psychiatric treatments should be provided for those with severe mental health problems. We must be aware of the challenge and concerns brought by 2019-nCoV. Every effort should be put to understand and control the disease. Therefore, the time to act is now (Wang et al., 2020). Studies show that in the early phase of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, a range of psychiatric morbidities was reported, including persistent depression, anxiety, panic attacks, psychomotor excitement, psychotic symptoms, delirium, and even suicidality (Xiang et al., 2020; Maunder et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2003). The psychosocial response to an infectious event of this magnitude is complex (Perrett et al., 2003). Maunder et al. (2003) concluded that patients and staff's emotional and behavioral reactions have been understood as a normal and adaptive response to stress during an overwhelming event. In the intervention with staff and patients, we found the stress-adaptation model particularly relevant (Folkman and Greer, 2000; Horowitz, 2001). Experience in the early days of this outbreak taught us the paramount importance of a few frequently recurrent clinical themes. First, insomnia is possibly the first casualty of such outbreak and, therefore, it is important to restore sleep. Staff and patients should be educated on sleep deprivation and insomnia. Second, most people cope very well in their own way and benefit a great deal of a relatively small quotient of shared concern, good information, and support. Third, when individuals are facing such a crisis, they should feel that they are not alone. All efforts to overcome interpersonal isolation, from joke sharing in the nursing station to conference calls, have important roles in times of severe strain and stress (Folkman and Greer, 2000). In accordance with Xiang et al. (2020) timely mental health care needs to be developed urgently. Some methods used in the SARS outbreak could be helpful for the response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. Multidisciplinary mental health teams established by health authorities at regional and national levels (including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, and other mental health workers) should provide mental health support for patients and health workers. Specialized psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services and facilities should be supplied to patients with comorbid mental disorders. In addition, health workers and patients should receive clear communication with regular and accurate updates regarding the 2019-nCoV outbreak, in order to address their sense of uncertainty and fear. Treatment plans, progress reports, and health status updates should be given to both patients and their families. Furthermore, safe services should be set up to provide psychological counseling using electronic devices and applications (such as smartphones and WeChat) for not only the affected patients, but also their families and members of the audience. Safe communication channels for patients and their families, such as smartphone communication and WeChat, should be encouraged to decrease isolation. It is noteworthy that most of the studies consider such stress-adaptation model useful and efficient (Xiang et al., 2020; Maunder et al., 2003; Folkman and Greer, 2000). Studies have also highlighted that the least amount of damage should be ensured when using psychotropic medicine, which will mainly decrease the harmful effects of any interaction with 2019-nCoV and its treatments.

Authors’ contributions

MLRN designed the review, developed the inclusion criteria, screened titles and abstracts, appraised the quality of included papers, and drafted the manuscript. MMM and JMML and PMMC and MNAO reviewed the study protocol and inclusion criteria and provided substantial input to the manuscript. MLRN reviewed the study protocol. MMM read and screened articles for inclusion. All authors critically reviewed drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The Research Group: Suicidology-Federal University of Ceará - UFC/National Council for Scientific and Technological Development- - body linked to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation to encourage research in Brazil.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  6 in total

1.  Outbreak of meningococcal disease in Rotherham illustrates the value of coordination, communication, and collaboration in management.

Authors:  K Perrett; W al-Wali; C Read; P Redgrave; U Trend
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other.

Authors:  S Folkman; S Greer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Yunyun Fang; Zhiqiang Guan; Bin Fan; Junhui Kong; Zhongling Yao; Xinhua Liu; Cordelia J Fuller; Ezra Susser; Jin Lu; Christina W Hoven
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Robert Maunder; Jonathan Hunter; Leslie Vincent; Jocelyn Bennett; Nathalie Peladeau; Molyn Leszcz; Joel Sadavoy; Lieve M Verhaeghe; Rosalie Steinberg; Tony Mazzulli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.

Authors:  Yu-Tao Xiang; Yuan Yang; Wen Li; Ling Zhang; Qinge Zhang; Teris Cheung; Chee H Ng
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 27.083

  6 in total
  52 in total

1.  Addressing mental health needs: an integral part of COVID-19 response.

Authors:  Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Anorexia nervosa: COVID-19 pandemic period (Review).

Authors:  Mihai Cristian Dumitrașcu; Florica Șandru; Mara Carsote; Razvan Cosmin Petca; Ancuta Augustina Gheorghisan-Galateanu; Aida Petca; Ana Valea
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  [Informations on psychotropics and their adaptations for patients suffering from mental disorders in France during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic].

Authors:  H Javelot; P-M Llorca; D Drapier; E Fakra; C Hingray; G Meyer; S Dizet; A Egron; C Straczek; M Roser; M Masson; R Gaillard; P Fossati; E Haffen
Journal:  Encephale       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 1.291

4.  COVID-19 phobia in a boy with undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder: A case report.

Authors:  Shoko Sakamoto; Dai Miyawaki; Ayako Goto; Yuji Harima; Daisuke Tokuhara; Koki Inoue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Rheumatology and psychiatry: allies in times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald; Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria; Graciela S Alarcón; Manuel F Ugarte-Gil
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Evaluation of COVID-19 phobia and the feeling of loneliness in the geriatric age group.

Authors:  Fatma G Cihan; Funda Gökgöz Durmaz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.149

7.  Development of the Adult Pandemic Attitude Scale (A-PAS).

Authors:  Mihyeon Seong; Juyoung Park; Soojin Chung; Sohyune Sok
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Holistic approach supporting mental wellbeing of people in enforced quarantine in South Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Katina D'Onise; Sonali Meena; Kamalesh Venugopal; Marc Currie; Emily Kirkpatrick; Jenny Hurley; Rebecca Nolan; John Brayley; Bryan Atherton; Nicola Spurrier
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.755

9.  Does social support matter? The mediating links with coping strategy and anxiety among Chinese college students in a cross-sectional study of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yue Li; Jun Peng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  COVID-19 and Psychosocial Support Services: Experiences of People Living with Enduring Mental Health Conditions.

Authors:  Anne Honey; Shifra Waks; Monique Hines; Helen Glover; Nicola Hancock; Debra Hamilton; Jennifer Smith-Merry
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.