Literature DB >> 3214589

The coordination of limb movements with different kinematic patterns.

S Swinnen1, C B Walter, D C Shapiro.   

Abstract

The principles underlying the coordination of limb movements with different spatiotemporal features were explored. After an initial training session in which the same unidirectional movement had to be performed with both upper limbs, subjects attempted to coordinate two different movements in a second session, i.e., the learned unidirectional movement in the left limb and a new double reversal movement in the right limb. The findings uncovered a wide variety in patterns of interlimb dependence among and within subjects, going from a high degree of dependence to relative independence. The relationship between limbs was studied by means of a detailed analysis of the displacement and acceleration patterns and the electromyographic activity of the major muscles involved. The general underlying principle that appeared to account for the diversity in movement organization was this: higher independence between limb movements is achieved when subjects initiate the movements to be coordinated successively. This asynchrony in movement onset can possibly be viewed as an attempt to safeguard against interference.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3214589     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  15 in total

1.  Finger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removal.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional synchronization in repetitive bimanual prehension movements.

Authors:  Marianne I Christel; Marc Jeannerod; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Breaking it down is better: haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robot-assisted motor learning.

Authors:  Julius Klein; Steven J Spencer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Jill Whitall
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.138

6.  Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; D E Young; C B Walter; D J Serrien
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Limitations on coupling of bimanual movements caused by arm dominance: when the muscle homology principle fails.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Keith G Nogueira; Stephan P Swinnen; Elizabeth Drummond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Coping with systematic bias during bilateral movement.

Authors:  C B Walter; S P Swinnen; D M Corcos; E Pollatou; H Y Pan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.