Literature DB >> 3214588

Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity?

S C Levine1, M T Banich, M P Koch-Weser.   

Abstract

Face-recognition ability has been claimed to be qualitatively different from other pattern-recognition abilities. One argument for this claim is the finding of a significant right hemisphere advantage for the recognition of upright but not inverted faces. However, this argument is justified only if this orientation-sensitive pattern is unique to faces. In the present study, comparable patterns of orientation-sensitive involvement of the right hemisphere are found for the recognition of faces and houses. This finding is interpreted as evidence for a right hemisphere schema formation capacity that is applied not only to upright faces but also to other familiar classes of stimuli in their canonical upright orientation. It is suggested that any greater right hemisphere involvement in the recognition of upright faces is due to our greater expertise at recognizing faces than other stimulus types. We also find evidence that only a subset of right-handed adults show orientation-sensitive right hemisphere involvement in the recognition of faces and houses: in particular, those dextrals with a characteristic hemispheric arousal asymmetry in favor of the right hemisphere. In contrast, dextrals with a characteristic arousal asymmetry in favor of the left hemisphere do not show significant visual field asymmetries for faces or houses in either upright or inverted orientations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3214588     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90057-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  16 in total

Review 1.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Perceiving speech from inverted faces.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

4.  A lack of left visual field bias when individuals with autism process faces.

Authors:  Eva M Dundas; Catherine A Best; Nancy J Minshew; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-06

5.  Human brain asymmetry in microstructural connectivity demonstrated by diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Chu-Yu Lee; Ali Tabesh; Travis Nesland; Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Maria V Spampinato; Leonardo Bonilha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Lateralization of kin recognition signals in the human face.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Left visual field biases when infants process faces: a comparison of infants at high- and low-risk for autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Eva Dundas; Holly Gastgeb; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-12

8.  Faces in the mist: illusory face and letter detection.

Authors:  Cory A Rieth; Kang Lee; Jiangang Lui; Jie Tian; David E Huber
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-08-15

9.  Response inhibition is modulated by functional cerebral asymmetries for facial expression perception.

Authors:  Sebastian Ocklenburg; Vanessa Ness; Onur Güntürkün; Boris Suchan; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-22

10.  Characteristic visuomotor influences on eye-movement patterns to faces and other high level stimuli.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.