Literature DB >> 32144939

Recent progress in bovine in vitro-derived embryo cryotolerance: Impact of in vitro culture systems, advances in cryopreservation and future considerations.

Luis B Ferré1, Michael E Kjelland2,3, Ahmed M Taiyeb2,4, Fernando Campos-Chillon5, Pablo J Ross6.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation of in vitro-derived bovine embryos is a crucial step for the widespread reproduction and conservation of valuable high-merit animals. Given the current popularity of bovine in vitro embryo production (IVP), there is a demand for a highly efficient ultra-low temperature storage method in order to maximize donor ovum pickup (OPU) turn-over, recipient availability/utilization and domestic/overseas commercial trading opportunities. However, IVP bovine embryos are still very sensitive to chilling and cryopreservation, and despite recent progress, a convenient (simple and robust) protocol has not yet been developed. At the moment, there are two methods for bovine IVP embryo cryopreservation: slow programmable freezing and vitrification. Both of the aforementioned techniques have pros and cons. While controlled-rate slow cooling can easily be adapted for direct transfer (DT), ice crystal formation remains an issue. On the other hand, vitrification solved this problem but the possibility of successful DT commercial incorporation remains to be determined. Moreover, simplification of the vitrification protocol (including warming) through the use of an in-straw dilution without the use of a microscope is a prerequisite for its use under farm conditions. This review summarizes the bovine IVP embryo cryopreservation achievements, strengths and limitations of both freezing systems and prospective improvements to enhance cryosurvival, as well as perspectives on future directions of this assisted reproductive technology.
© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine; culture environment; direct transfer; embryo; in vitro fertilization; slow freezing; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32144939     DOI: 10.1111/rda.13667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  7 in total

1.  Novel Synthetic oviductal fluid for Conventional Freezing 1 (SCF1) culture medium improves development and cryotolerance of in vitro produced Holstein embryos.

Authors:  Corie M Owen; Melissa A Johnson; Katherine A Rhodes-Long; Diana J Gumber; Moises Barceló-Fimbres; Joy L Altermatt; Lino Fernando Campos-Chillon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  SPERM FACTORS AND EGG ACTIVATION: ICSI and the discovery of the sperm factor and PLCZ1.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Hiroki Akizawa; Hoi Chang Lee; Rafael A Fissore
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Determinants of survival of the bovine blastocyst to cryopreservation stress: treatment with colony stimulating factor 2 during the morula-to-blastocyst transition and embryo sex.

Authors:  Froylan Sosa; Jeremy Block; Yao Xiao; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2020-09-03

4.  Fatty Acid Supplementation During in vitro Embryo Production Determines Cryosurvival Characteristics of Bovine Blastocysts.

Authors:  H Aardema; I Bertijn; Hta van Tol; A Rijneveld; Jcm Vernooij; B M Gadella; Plam Vos
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Effects of the donor factors and freezing protocols on the bovine embryonic lipid profile†.

Authors:  Sarah Janati Idrissi; Daniel Le Bourhis; Antoine Lefevre; Patrick Emond; Laurene Le Berre; Olivier Desnoës; Thierry Joly; Samuel Buff; Sandrine Freret; Laurent Schibler; Pascal Salvetti; Sébastien Elis
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Exopolysaccharide ID1 Improves Post-Warming Outcomes after Vitrification of In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Erika Alina Ordóñez-León; Iris Martínez-Rodero; Tania García-Martínez; Manel López-Béjar; Marc Yeste; Elena Mercade; Teresa Mogas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 7.  The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren't pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Peter J Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.