PURPOSE: This study assessed the: (1) effect of an LGBTQI + health equity curriculum (eQuality) on implicit attitudes among first (M1) and second year (M2) medical students and (2) utility of dedicated time to explore implicit bias. METHOD: Implicit biases were assessed at baseline using implicit association tests (IAT) for all M2s and a random sample of first years (M1A). These students were then debriefed on strategies to mitigate bias. Following eQuality, all M1 and M2s completed post-intervention IATs. The remaining first years (M1B) were then debriefed. Paired sample t-tests assessed differences between pre/post. Independent sample t-tests assessed differences in post-IATs between M1 groups. RESULTS: IATs indicated preferences for "Straight," "White," and "Thin" at both pre and post. M2s demonstrated statistically significant improvements pre to post for sexuality (p = 0.01) and race (p = 0.03). There were significant differences in post-intervention IAT scores between M1As who received the IAT and debriefing prior to eQuality and M1Bs for sexuality (p = 0.002) and race (p = 0.046). There were no significant changes for weight. CONCLUSION: eQuality reduced implicit preference for "Straight" and "White." Differences in M1 post-intervention IAT scores between groups suggest dedicating time to debrief implicit attitudes enhances bias mitigation.
PURPOSE: This study assessed the: (1) effect of an LGBTQI + health equity curriculum (eQuality) on implicit attitudes among first (M1) and second year (M2) medical students and (2) utility of dedicated time to explore implicit bias. METHOD: Implicit biases were assessed at baseline using implicit association tests (IAT) for all M2s and a random sample of first years (M1A). These students were then debriefed on strategies to mitigate bias. Following eQuality, all M1 and M2s completed post-intervention IATs. The remaining first years (M1B) were then debriefed. Paired sample t-tests assessed differences between pre/post. Independent sample t-tests assessed differences in post-IATs between M1 groups. RESULTS: IATs indicated preferences for "Straight," "White," and "Thin" at both pre and post. M2s demonstrated statistically significant improvements pre to post for sexuality (p = 0.01) and race (p = 0.03). There were significant differences in post-intervention IAT scores between M1As who received the IAT and debriefing prior to eQuality and M1Bs for sexuality (p = 0.002) and race (p = 0.046). There were no significant changes for weight. CONCLUSION: eQuality reduced implicit preference for "Straight" and "White." Differences in M1 post-intervention IAT scores between groups suggest dedicating time to debrief implicit attitudes enhances bias mitigation.
Authors: Jessica Salkind; Faye Gishen; Ginger Drage; Jayne Kavanagh; Henry W W Potts Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Monica B Vela; Amarachi I Erondu; Nichole A Smith; Monica E Peek; James N Woodruff; Marshall H Chin Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 21.870