Literature DB >> 32144733

Video-based learning versus traditional lecture-based learning for osteoporosis education: a randomized controlled trial.

Pojchong Chotiyarnwong1, Wararat Boonnasa2, Chayaporn Chotiyarnwong3, Aasis Unnanuntana4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient education about osteoporosis is an important component of osteoporosis treatment. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of osteoporosis education between video-based learning and traditional lecture-based learning.
METHODS: Participants who attended the Outpatient Department of Siriraj Hospital during June 2017 to November 2017 were recruited. Ten-question pre- and post-tests were used to evaluate participant osteoporosis knowledge. After finishing the pre-test, patients were randomized to receive osteoporosis education via either traditional lecture-based or video-based learning for 25 min. After the training, patient questions about the subject matter were answered, and then the post-test was administered. Change in score was compared between groups using non-inferiority test at a non-inferiority margin of - 1.
RESULTS: Of 413 participants, 207 and 206 people were allocated to the lecture-based group and the video-based group, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, change in score between pre-test and post-test, or change in score between pre-test and retention test between groups. Non-inferiority test revealed the change in score after video-based learning to be non-inferior to traditional lecture-based learning at a difference of > - 1, α = 0.05 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Video-based osteoporosis education can be used as part of a fracture liaison service to provide essential information about osteoporosis to both patients and caregivers. Video-based education is an efficient and effective tool that will reduce dependency on clinicians to provide lecture-based osteoporosis instruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Since video- and lecture-based education were found to be equally effective, a standard package for both education techniques should be developed and implemented for all patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture liaison service; Lecture-based learning; Osteoporosis education; Randomized controlled trial; Video-based learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32144733     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01514-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  9 in total

Review 1.  Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.

Authors:  Steven A Julious
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 3.  Videos to influence: a systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors.

Authors:  William Tuong; Elizabeth R Larsen; April W Armstrong
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-11-28

4.  Age-related prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures: real-world data from an Austrian Menopause and Osteoporosis Clinic.

Authors:  E P Boschitsch; E Durchschlag; H P Dimai
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 5.  Approaches to patient education: emphasizing the long-term value of compliance and persistence.

Authors:  Deborah T Gold; Betsy McClung
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education.

Authors:  M E Gagliano
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1988-10

Review 7.  Patient education in osteoporosis prevention: a systematic review focusing on methodological quality of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jana-Carina Morfeld; Vera Vennedey; Dirk Müller; Dawid Pieper; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Hsing Wu; Shih-Te Tu; Yin-Fan Chang; Ding-Cheng Chan; Jui-Teng Chien; Chih-Hsueh Lin; Sonal Singh; Manikanta Dasari; Jung-Fu Chen; Keh-Sung Tsai
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Impact of preventive osteoporosis education on patient behavior: immediate and 3-month follow-up.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kulp; Sarika Rane; Gloria Bachmann
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effect of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention on quality of life in patients with fragility fractures: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  R Okuda; M Osaki; Y Saeki; T Okano; K Tsuda; T Nakamura; Y Morio; H Nagashima; H Hagino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Improving medical student recruitment into neurosurgery through teaching reform.

Authors:  Jun Shen; Lili Yuan; Ruixiang Ge; Xuefei Shao; Xiaochun Jiang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 3.  Quality improvement initiatives in the care and prevention of fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region.

Authors:  Paul James Mitchell; Seng Bin Ang; Leilani Basa Mercado-Asis; Reynaldo Rey-Matias; Wen-Shiang Chen; Leon Flicker; Edward Leung; David Choon; Sankara Kumar Chandrasekaran; Jacqueline Clare Therese Close; Hannah Seymour; Cyrus Cooper; Philippe Halbout; Robert Daniel Blank; Yanling Zhao; Jae-Young Lim; Irewin Tabu; Maoyi Tian; Aasis Unnanuntana; Ronald Man Yeung Wong; Noriaki Yamamoto; Ding-Cheng Chan; Joon Kiong Lee
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.879

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.