| Literature DB >> 32143401 |
Natalia Manousi1,2, Erwin Rosenberg2, Eleni Deliyanni3, George A Zachariadis1, Victoria Samanidou1.
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO) is a chemical compound with a form similar to graphene that consists of one-atom-thick two-dimensional layers of sp2-bonded carbon. Graphene oxide exhibits high hydrophilicity and dispersibility. Thus, it is difficult to be separated from aqueous solutions. Therefore, functionalization with magnetic nanoparticles is performed in order to prepare a magnetic GO nanocomposite that combines the sufficient adsorption capacity of graphene oxide and the convenience of magnetic separation. Moreover, the magnetic material can be further functionalized with different groups to prevent aggregation and extends its potential application. Until today, a plethora of magnetic GO hybrid materials have been synthesized and successfully employed for the magnetic solid-phase extraction of organic compounds from environmental, agricultural, biological, and food samples. The developed GO nanocomposites exhibit satisfactory stability in aqueous solutions, as well as sufficient surface area. Thus, they are considered as an alternative to conventional sorbents by enriching the analytical toolbox for the analysis of trace organic compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Graphene oxide; MSPE; biological samples; environmental samples; food samples; magnetic solid-phase extraction; organic pollutants; sample preparation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32143401 PMCID: PMC7179219 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25051148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of graphite, graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, and magnetic graphene oxide.
Applications of GO/Fe3O4 for the magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) of organic compounds from biological, environmental and food samples.
| Analyte | Sample Matrix | Synthetic Route | Analytical Technique | LODs (ng mL−1) | Recovery (%) | Reusability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Tamsulosin hydrochloride | Plasma | Mix/Stirring | HPLC-UV | 0.17 | 98.1–101.4 | At least 4 times | [ |
| Pseudoephedrine | Urine | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-UV | 25 | 96.42 | N.A. | [ |
| Psychoactive drugs | Urine | Chemical coprecipitation | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.02–0.2 | 80.4–105.5 | At least 10 times | [ |
| Methamphetamine | Urine | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-UV | 30 | 93.5 | At least 1 time | [ |
| PAH metabolites | Urine | Mix/Agitation | UHPLC-MS | 0.01–0.15 | 98.3–125.2 | N.A. | [ |
|
| |||||||
| PCB 28 | Water | Chemical coprecipitation | GC-MS | 0.027–0.059 | 77.2–99.7 | N.A. | [ |
| Atrazine | Water | Chemical coprecipitation | GC-MS | 0.6 × 10−3 | 96–102 | N.A. | [ |
| DEHP | Water | Solvothermal approach | HPLC-DAD | 0.35 | 91.6–106.5 | N.A. | [ |
| PAHs | Water | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-UV | 0.09–0.19 | 76.8–101.2 | N.A. | [ |
| TNT | Water | Mix/Stirring | HPLC-UV | 0.3 | 87–120 | Up to 6 times | [ |
| Malachite Green, | Water | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-UV | 0.091–0.12 | 91.5–116 | N.A. | [ |
| Imatinib, doxorubicin | Water | Mix/Stirring | HPLC-UV | 1.8–1.9 | 88.4–96.7 | N.A. | [ |
| Sulfonamides | Water | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-DAD | 50–100 | 67.4–119.9 | N.A. | [ |
|
| |||||||
| Sulfonamides | Milk | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.02–0.13 | 73.4–97.4 | At least 6 times | [ |
| Sulfonamides | Milk | Solvothermal approach | CE-DAD | 0.89–2.31 | 62.7–104.8 | At least 3 times | [ |
| Sulfadiazine | Milk, honey, water | Chemical coprecipitation | Spectrophotometry | 340 | 94.3–100.7 | At least 10 times | [ |
| Patulin | Apple juice | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-UV | 2.3 ng g−1 | 68.7–83.6 | At least 10 times | [ |
| Flavors, fragrances | Orange juice, chocolate, fruit sugar | Chemical coprecipitation | HPLC-DAD | 20–40 | 71.5–112.4 | At least 5 times | [ |
| Flavonoids | Tea, wine, urine | Solvothermal approach | HPLC-DAD | 0.2–6.0 | 82.0–101.4 | N.A. | [ |
| Azo dyes | Jelly, candy, plum candy | Solvothermal approach | HPLC-UV | 0.36–2.23 ng g−1 | 73.2–107.7 | Up to 6 times | [ |
| Lignans | Sesame oil | Hydroxylation, sonication | HPLC-UV | 20–50 ng g−1 | 84.6–86.8 | N.A. | [ |
Figure 2TEM (a), FT-IR (b), XRD (c) and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (d) of GO/Fe3O4. Reproduced with permission from [57]. Copyright Elsevier, 2017.
Figure 3Scanning electron micrographs of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/Fe3O4 prepared by solvothermal (a), hydrothermal (b) and co-precipitation (c) methods. Reproduced with permission from [64]. Copyright Elsevier, 2015.
Application of functionalized GO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites for the MSPE of organic compounds.
| Analyte | Sample Matrix | Functional Group | Analytical Technique | LODs (ng mL−1) | Recovery (%) | Reusability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Chlorpheniramine | Plasma | Polythionine | HPLC-UV | 0.4 | 87.9–96.4 | At least 6 times | [ |
| Duloxetine | Plasma | Polythionine | HPLC-UV | 0.5 | 87 | At least 9 times | [ |
| Gemfibrozil | Serum | β-CD | Spectrofluorometry | 3 × 10−3 | 96.0–104.0 | At least 50 times | [ |
| SSRIs | Plasma | PAMAM | HPLC-UV | 0.3–0.9 | 89.1–97.9 | Up to 20 times | [ |
|
| |||||||
| Sulphonamide | Water | Porphyrin | HPLC-DAD | 200 | 83.7–116.7 | At least 8 times | [ |
| Chlorophenols | Water | Poly (DVB-co-GMA) | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.6–9.2 | 86.4–99.8 | N.A. | [ |
| PAHs | Water | Polystyrene | GC-FID | 3 × 10−3–10 × 10−3 | 69.5–88.7 | N.A. | [ |
| PAHs | Water | Poly(pyrrole-co-aniline) | GC-FID | 0.003–0.01 | 50.4–78.3 | At least 20 times | [ |
| Estrogens | Water | Triethylenetetramine | LC-MS/MS | 0.15–1.5 × 10−3 | 88.5–105.6 | N.A. | [ |
| Malachite green | Water | SEP | UV Vis | 0.2 | 96.3 | At least 50 times | [ |
|
| |||||||
| Organophosphorus pesticides | Vegetables | Sporopollenin | GC-ECD | 0.02–0.05 | 81.0–120.0 | N.A. | [ |
| Organophosphorus pesticides | Fruit, vegetables, water | Phenylethyl amine | GC-NPD | 0.02–0.1 | >80.4 | At least 30 times | [ |
| PAHs | Vegetable oils | Phytic acid | HPLC-DAD | 0.06–0.15 ng g−1 | 85.6–102.3 | At least 20 time | [ |
| sildenafil citrate | Herbal supplementary products | Nanodiamond | HPLC-DAD | 1.49 | 94.0–104.1 | At least 10 times | [ |
|
| |||||||
| Cytokinins | Plants | Silica | HPLC-MS/MS | 93–120 × 103 | 78.9–97.3 | At least 30 times | [ |
Figure 4Synthesis of phenylethyl amine functionalized GO/Fe3O4 (a) and its application on the MSPE procedure (b). Reproduced with permission from [91]. Copyright Elsevier, 2015.
Figure 5SEM images of Cu-MOFs (a) and Fe3O4@SiO2-GO-MOFs (b) and TEM images of Cu-MOFs (c) and Fe3O4@SiO2-GO-MOFs (d). Reproduced with permission from [107]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.