Literature DB >> 32142881

Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults.

Michael J Imburgio1, Iulia Banica2, Kaylin E Hill3, Anna Weinberg2, Dan Foti3, Annmarie MacNamara4.   

Abstract

Psychological assessments typically rely on self-report and behavioral measures. Augmenting these with neurophysiological measures of the construct in question may increase the accuracy and predictive power of these assessments. Moreover, thinking about neurophysiological measures from an assessment perspective may facilitate under-utilized research approaches (e.g., brain-based recruitment of participants). However, the lack of normative data for most neurophysiological measures has prevented the comparison of individual responses to the general population, precluding these approaches. The current work examines the distributions of two event-related potentials (ERPs) commonly used in individual differences research: the error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe). Across three lab sites, 800 unselected participants between the ages of 18 and 30 performed the arrow version of a Flanker task while EEG was recorded. Percentile scores and distributions for ERPs on error trials, correct trials, and the difference (ΔERN, ΔPe; error minus correct) at Fz, Cz and Pz are reported. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile values for the ΔERN at Cz were -2.37 ​μV, -5.41 ​μV, and -8.65 ​μV, respectively. The same values for ΔPe at Cz were 7.51 ​μV, 11.18 ​μV, and 15.55 ​μV. Females displayed significantly larger ΔPe magnitudes and smaller ΔERN magnitudes than males. Additionally, normative data for behavioral performance (accuracy, post-error slowing, and reaction time) on the Flanker task is reported. Results provide a means by which ERN and Pe amplitudes of young adults elicited by the arrow Flanker task can be benchmarked, facilitating the classification of neural responses as 'large,' 'medium,' or 'small'. The ability to classify responses in this manner is a necessary step towards expanded use of these measures in assessment and research settings. These norms may not apply to ERPs elicited by other tasks, and future work should establish similar norms using other tasks.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERN; ERP; Flanker; Norms; Pe

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32142881      PMCID: PMC7197955          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  104 in total

1.  Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Insel; Bruce Cuthbert; Marjorie Garvey; Robert Heinssen; Daniel S Pine; Kevin Quinn; Charles Sanislow; Philip Wang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics.

Authors:  Michael J Kozak; Bruce N Cuthbert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Mattie Tops; Anne E Wester; Theo F Meijman; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Error detection, correction, and prevention in the brain: a brief review of data and theories.

Authors:  V van Veen; C S Carter
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  P300 amplitude as an indicator of externalizing in adolescent males.

Authors:  Christopher J Patrick; Edward M Bernat; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono; Robert F Krueger; Matt McGue
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Reliability of error-related brain activity.

Authors:  Doreen M Olvet; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Increased dopamine release in the right anterior cingulate cortex during the performance of a sorting task: a [11C]FLB 457 PET study.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ko; Alain Ptito; Oury Monchi; Sang Soo Cho; Thilo Van Eimeren; Giovanna Pellecchia; Benedicte Ballanger; Pablo Rusjan; Sylvain Houle; Antonio P Strafella
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Error-related brain activity reveals self-centric motivation: culture matters.

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-02-11

9.  The relationship between depressive symptoms and error monitoring during response switching.

Authors:  Hans S Schroder; Tim P Moran; Zachary P Infantolino; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.

Authors:  Asghar Ghasemi; Saleh Zahediasl
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-20
View more
  7 in total

1.  Mother-infant convergence of event-related potentials elicited by face and object processing.

Authors:  Kaylin E Hill; Wei Siong Neo; Erika Deming; Lisa R Hamrick; Bridgette L Kelleher; Dan Foti
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 2.  Event-related potential studies of emotion regulation: A review of recent progress and future directions.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; Keanan Joyner; Julia Klawohn
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Emerging biomarkers for child & family intervention studies: A review of EEG studies of parenting.

Authors:  Nastassia J Hajal; Sandra K Loo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.111

4.  The reward positivity shows increased amplitude and decreased latency with increasing age in early childhood.

Authors:  Laura Hennefield; Kirsten Gilbert; Diana Whalen; Cristal Giorio; Laura E Quiñones Camacho; Danielle Kelly; Ethan Fleuchaus; Deanna M Barch; Joan L Luby; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-11-27

5.  The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.

Authors:  Linfeng Hu; Dingzhong Feng; Yelang Li; Jinwu Xu; Jiehui Zheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

6.  Performance Monitoring and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Clarifying Pathways to Internalizing Psychopathology.

Authors:  Autumn Kujawa
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci       Date:  2021-12-15

7.  Sex Differences in Anxiety: An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Sex in Performance Monitoring and Attentional Bias to Threat in High Trait Anxious Individuals.

Authors:  Natalie Strand; Lin Fang; Joshua M Carlson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.