RATIONALE: Understanding current early mobilization practice of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) is critical to the design and implementation of strategies to facilitate its application in a diverse population of critically ill patients encountered in public sector hospitals. AIM: To evaluate the organizational structures of South African public sector hospital ICUs and to describe early mobilization practices in these units. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done in participating public hospitals from eight provinces in South Africa. Convenience sampling was done. Data collected included hospital and ICU structure, adult patient demographic and clinical data, and mobilization activities done in ICU over the previous 24 hours prior to the day of the survey. RESULTS: A total of 29 ICUs from 13 participating hospitals were surveyed resulting in 205 patient records. Majority of the surveyed ICUs were "open" type (n = 16; 55.2%). A standardized sedation scoring system was used in 18 units (62.1%) and only two units (6.9%) had an early mobilization protocol in place. Mean age of the patients surveyed was 43.5 (±17.7) years and 148 (72.2%) patients were on mechanical ventilation. Primary reasons for admission to ICU included traumatic injury (n = 86; 42%) and postoperative care (n = 33; 16.1%). Mobilization activities performed in the previous 24 hours included turning the patient in bed (n = 88; 42.9%), marching on the spot (n = 9; 4.4%) and walking (n = 10; 4.9%). Out-of-bed mobilization was done in only 40 (19.5%) patients. The most common barriers to early mobilization included patient unresponsiveness (n = 50; 24.4%) and hemodynamic instability (n = 42; 20.5%). The type of ventilation was found to have a significant positive relationship with out-of-bed patient mobilization (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients attained their highest level of mobilization in ICU. The type of ventilation influenced early mobilization practices in public sector ICUs in South Africa.
RATIONALE: Understanding current early mobilization practice of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) is critical to the design and implementation of strategies to facilitate its application in a diverse population of critically ill patients encountered in public sector hospitals. AIM: To evaluate the organizational structures of South African public sector hospital ICUs and to describe early mobilization practices in these units. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done in participating public hospitals from eight provinces in South Africa. Convenience sampling was done. Data collected included hospital and ICU structure, adult patient demographic and clinical data, and mobilization activities done in ICU over the previous 24 hours prior to the day of the survey. RESULTS: A total of 29 ICUs from 13 participating hospitals were surveyed resulting in 205 patient records. Majority of the surveyed ICUs were "open" type (n = 16; 55.2%). A standardized sedation scoring system was used in 18 units (62.1%) and only two units (6.9%) had an early mobilization protocol in place. Mean age of the patients surveyed was 43.5 (±17.7) years and 148 (72.2%) patients were on mechanical ventilation. Primary reasons for admission to ICU included traumatic injury (n = 86; 42%) and postoperative care (n = 33; 16.1%). Mobilization activities performed in the previous 24 hours included turning the patient in bed (n = 88; 42.9%), marching on the spot (n = 9; 4.4%) and walking (n = 10; 4.9%). Out-of-bed mobilization was done in only 40 (19.5%) patients. The most common barriers to early mobilization included patient unresponsiveness (n = 50; 24.4%) and hemodynamic instability (n = 42; 20.5%). The type of ventilation was found to have a significant positive relationship with out-of-bed patient mobilization (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients attained their highest level of mobilization in ICU. The type of ventilation influenced early mobilization practices in public sector ICUs in South Africa.
Authors: Peter Nydahl; A Parker Ruhl; Gabriele Bartoszek; Rolf Dubb; Silke Filipovic; Hans-Jürgen Flohr; Arnold Kaltwasser; Hendrik Mende; Oliver Rothaug; Danny Schuchhardt; Norbert Schwabbauer; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrew Nicol; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Nadine Schuurman; Richard Matzopoulos; Eiman Zargaran; Jonathan Cinnamon; Vanessa Fawcett; Tracey Taulu; S Morad Hameed Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Nathan E Brummel; Jennifer L Thompson; Christopher G Hughes; Brenda T Pun; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi K Shintani; Ramona O Hopkins; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 30.700