| Literature DB >> 32140393 |
Xueqin Yang1, Dongke Yu2, Li Xue1, Hui Li1, Junrong Du1.
Abstract
ProBiotic-4 is a probiotic preparation composed of Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. This study aims to investigate the effects of ProBiotic-4 on the microbiota-gut-brain axis and cognitive deficits, and to explore the underlying molecular mechanism using senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAMP8) mice. ProBiotic-4 was orally administered to 9-month-old SAMP8 mice for 12 weeks. We observed that ProBiotic-4 significantly improved the memory deficits, cerebral neuronal and synaptic injuries, glial activation, and microbiota composition in the feces and brains of aged SAMP8 mice. ProBiotic-4 substantially attenuated aging-related disruption of the intestinal barrier and blood-brain barrier, decreased interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α at both mRNA and protein levels, reduced plasma and cerebral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentration, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression, and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) nuclear translocation in the brain. In addition, not only did ProBiotic-4 significantly decreased the levels of γ-H2AX, 8-hydroxydesoxyguanosine, and retinoic-acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), it also abrogated RIG-I multimerization in the brain. These findings suggest that targeting gut microbiota with probiotics may have a therapeutic potential for the deficits of the microbiota-gut-brain axis and cognitive function in aging, and that its mechanism is associated with inhibition of both TLR4-and RIG-I-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway and inflammatory responses.Entities:
Keywords: 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxydesoxyguanosine; AAMI, age-associated memory impairment; AD, Alzheimer's disease; BBB, blood–brain barrier; CFU, colony-forming units; Cognitive decline; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; F/B, Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IL-6, interleukin-6; Iba-1, ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule-1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; Microbiota–gut–brain axis; NF-κB; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NMDS, non-metric multidimensional scaling; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; Probiotics; RIG-I; RIG-I, retinoic-acid-inducible gene-I; SAMP8 mice; SAMP8, senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8; SYN, synaptophysin; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TLR4; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; VE-cadherin, vascular endothelial-cadherin; ZO-1, zona occluden-1
Year: 2019 PMID: 32140393 PMCID: PMC7049608 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1ProBiotic-4 treatment improved memory deficits and neuronal injury in aged SAMP8 mice. (A) Alternation in the Y-maze test at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after ProBiotic-4 treatment. (B) Step-down latency and error times in the step-down passive avoidance test. (C) Representative photomicrographs and quantitative analysis of the number of neurons per field in the cerebral cortex and hippocampal CA1 areas, analyzed by Nissl staining and NeuN immunostaining. (D) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of SYN expression in brain tissues. The level of SYN was normalized to β-actin. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10–12/group in A and B; n = 5–6/group in C and D). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus SAMP8 group treated with vehicle (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 2ProBiotic-4 treatment modified brain and gut microbiota composition in aged SAMP8 mice. (A) and (B) α-Diversity of flora in the brain and feces. (C) and (D) β-Diversity of flora in the brain and feces. (E) and (F) Diversity of microbial composition based on quality-controlled OTU reads in the brain and feces. (G) F/B ratio. (H)–(J) Effects of ProBiotic-4 on Proteobacteria, Pseudomonas and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus SAMP8 group treated with vehicle (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 3Effects of ProBiotic-4 treatment on intestinal tight junction proteins and inflammation in aged SAMP8 mice. (A) Representative photomicrographs of HE staining and immunostaining of intestine tight junction markers claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 in the intestine. (B)–(D) Quantitative image analysis of claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 protein expressions based on the integrated optical density (IOD). (E) PCR analysis of Il-6 and Tnf-α mRNA levels in the intestine. The relative mRNA levels of Il-6 and Tnf-α were normalized to Gapdh. The results are expressed as the normalized fold change relative to vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (F) and (G) IL-6, TNF-α and LPS levels in Plasma were measured by ELISA. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6–7/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus SAMP8 group treated with vehicle (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 4ProBiotic-4 alleviated the BBB injury and inflammationin aged SAMP8 mice. (A) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of ZO-1, VE-cadherin, occludin, and claudin-5 expressions in the brain tissues. The levels of ZO-1, VE-cadherin, occludin, and claudin-5 were normalized to β-actin. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to the vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (B) TEM observation of ultrastructure of the BBB. (C) Representative photomicrographs of Iba-1-positive microglia and GFAP-positive astrocytes in the hippocampal CA1 area. (D) Quantitative photomicrograph analysis of the Iba-1- and GFAP-positive area in the hippocampal CA1 area. (E) LPS level in the brain was measured by ELISA. (F) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of TLR4 expression in the brain tissues. The levels of TLR4 were normalized to β-actin. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to the vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (G) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of the NF-κB nuclear translocation in the brain tissues. The levels of NF-κB were normalized to lamin B. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to the vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (H) PCR analysis of Il-6 and Tnf-α mRNA levels in the brain. The relative mRNA levels of Il-6 and Tnf-α were normalized to Gapdh. The results are expressed as the normalized fold change relative to vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus SAMP8 group treated with vehicle (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 5ProBiotic-4 reduced oxidative DNA damage and inhibited RIG-I activation in the brain in aged SAMP8 mice. (A) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of γ-H2AX expression in the brain tissues. The levels of γ-H2AX was normalized to β-actin. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to the vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (B) The DNA oxidation product 8-OHdG level in the brain was measured by ELISA. (C) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analysis of RIG-I expression in the brain tissues. The levels of RIG-I was normalized to β-actin. The results are expressed as the normalized optical density value relative to vehicle-treated SAMR1 group. (D) Representative immunoblots of RIG-I multimerization in the brain tissues. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus SAMP8 group treated with vehicle (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 6Correlation between TLR4-and RIG-I-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway in the brain and microbiota–gut–brain axis imbalance. The red oval node represents the TLR4-and RIG-I-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway in the brain, and the blue rectangular node represents gut microbiota. The orange rectangular node represents the intestinal barrier, and the purple rectangular node represents the cognitive function. The red edge represents the positive correlation, the black edge represents the negative correlation, and the gray dotted edge represents no correlation. The r represents Spearman's correlation coefficient. Data were collected from vehicle-treated and probiotic-treated SAMP8 mice (n = 5–6/group). One-tailed Spearman's analysis, confidence interval 95%.