Literature DB >> 3213840

Use of microbiology reports by physicians in prescribing antimicrobial agents.

L Campo1, J M Mylotte.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of microbiologic reports by physicians in prescribing antimicrobial agents in a community hospital setting. Patients were identified by daily review of all blood, urine, and sputum cultures that grew pathogen(s) during a 7-week period. Appropriateness of antibiotic therapy was based on results of antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolated pathogen(s). The physician response to culture results was evaluated on changes made in antimicrobial therapy. Seventy-one patients with 73 cultures (infections) were identified; 70% of the infections were community acquired. The frequency of each infection during the study period was: bacteremia (N = 12), pneumonia (N = 18), definite urinary tract infection (N = 26) and probable urinary tract infection (N = 17). Initial treatment was appropriate in 49 of 73 (67%) episodes; the organism(s) isolated were resistant to initial therapy in 24 of 85 (33%) episodes. After culture results were available, 34 of 73 (47%) regimens were changed, but only 50% of the changes were considered appropriate. Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of all treatment regimens considered appropriate before (67%) and after (56%) culture results were known. We conclude that results of cultures and antibiotic susceptibility data had little influence on appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in the hospital setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3213840     DOI: 10.1097/00000441-198812000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  8 in total

1.  Influence of microbiological reports on physician's choice of antimicrobial treatment for susceptible pathogens.

Authors:  J Cobo; J Oliva; J Sanz; J M Aguado; Jose L Del Pozo; J del Pozo; S Moreno
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Limitations of paperless on-line reporting of diagnostic bacteriology culture results.

Authors:  C Block; J Laloum; A Rajs; R Stalnikowicz; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; G Kacich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical value of microbiological investigations in general practice.

Authors:  D S Tompkins; A M Shannon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Comparison of direct and standardized testing of infected urine for antimicrobial susceptibilities by disk diffusion.

Authors:  A R Oakes; R Badger; D I Grove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Resistance surveillance studies: a multifaceted problem--the fluoroquinolone example.

Authors:  A Dalhoff
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  R C Bartlett; M Mazens-Sullivan; J Z Tetreault; S Lobel; J Nivard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women.

Authors:  J R Johnson; F S Tiu; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.