Literature DB >> 22460782

Resistance surveillance studies: a multifaceted problem--the fluoroquinolone example.

A Dalhoff1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This review summarizes data on the fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology published in the previous 5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data reviewed are stratified according to the different prescription patterns by either primary- or tertiary-care givers and by indication. Global surveillance studies demonstrate that fluoroquinolone- resistance rates increased in the past several years in almost all bacterial species except Staphylococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae causing community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTIs), as well as Enterobacteriaceae causing community-acquired urinary tract infections. Geographically and quantitatively varying fluoroquinolone resistance rates were recorded among Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens causing healthcare-associated respiratory tract infections. One- to two-thirds of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) were fluoroquinolone resistant too, thus, limiting the fluoroquinolone use in the treatment of community- as well as healthcare-acquired urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections. The remaining ESBL-producing or plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance mechanisms harboring Enterobacteriaceae were low-level quinolone resistant. Furthermore, 10-30 % of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae causing CARTIs harbored first-step quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) mutations. These mutants pass susceptibility testing unnoticed and are primed to acquire high-level fluoroquinolone resistance rapidly, thus, putting the patient at risk. The continued increase in fluoroquinolone resistance affects patient management and necessitates changes in some current guidelines for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections or even precludes the use of fluoroquinolones in certain indications like gonorrhea and pelvic inflammatory diseases in those geographic areas in which fluoroquinolone resistance rates and/or ESBL production is high. Fluoroquinolone resistance has been selected among the commensal flora colonizing the gut, nose, oropharynx, and skin, so that horizontal gene transfer between the commensal flora and the offending pathogen as well as inter- and intraspecies recombinations contribute to the emergence and spread of fluoroquinolone resistance among pathogenic streptococci. Although interspecies recombinations are not yet the major cause for the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance, its existence indicates that a large reservoir of fluoroquinolone resistance exists. Thus, a scenario resembling that of a worldwide spread of β-lactam resistance in pneumococci is conceivable. However, many resistance surveillance studies suffer from inaccuracies like the sampling of a selected patient population, restricted geographical sampling, and undefined requirements of the user, so that the results are biased. The number of national centers is most often limited with one to two participating laboratories, so that such studies are point prevalence but not surveillance studies. Selected samples are analyzed predominantly as either hospitalized patients or patients at risk or those in whom therapy failed are sampled; however, fluoroquinolones are most frequently prescribed by the general practitioner. Selected sampling results in a significant over-estimation of fluoroquinolone resistance in outpatients. Furthermore, the requirements of the users are often not met; the prescribing physician, the microbiologist, the infection control specialist, public health and regulatory authorities, and the pharmaceutical industry have diverse interests, which, however, are not addressed by different designs of a surveillance study. Tools should be developed to provide customer-specific datasets.
CONCLUSION: Consequently, most surveillance studies suffer from well recognized but uncorrected biases or inaccuracies. Nevertheless, they provide important information that allows the identification of trends in pathogen incidence and antimicrobial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22460782     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-012-0257-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  271 in total

1.  Irrational prescribing in South Asia: a case of fluoroquinolone-associated phototoxicity.

Authors:  William Cave; Prativa Pandey; Santanu Chatterjee
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.490

2.  Invasive Neisseria meningitidis with decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in South Africa, 2009.

Authors:  Mignon du Plessis; Linda de Gouveia; Happy Skosana; Juno Thomas; Lucille Blumberg; Keith P Klugman; Anne von Gottberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Molecular evolution perspectives on intraspecific lateral DNA transfer of topoisomerase and gyrase loci in Streptococcus pneumoniae, with implications for fluoroquinolone resistance development and spread.

Authors:  Michael J Stanhope; Stacey L Walsh; Julie A Becker; Michael J Italia; Karen A Ingraham; Michael N Gwynn; Tom Mathie; James A Poupard; Linda A Miller; James R Brown; Heather Amrine-Madsen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The adherence of GPs to guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract infections in women is poor.

Authors:  Carl Llor; Gloria Rabanaque; Ana López; Josep Maria Cots
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Consumer survey on microbiology reports.

Authors:  V P Ackerman; R C Pritchard; D J Obbink; R Bradbury; A Lee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Community and hospital spread of Escherichia coli producing CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the UK.

Authors:  N Woodford; M E Ward; M E Kaufmann; J Turton; E J Fagan; D James; A P Johnson; R Pike; M Warner; T Cheasty; A Pearson; S Harry; J B Leach; A Loughrey; J A Lowes; R E Warren; D M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat.

Authors:  Jacob Strahilevitz; George A Jacoby; David C Hooper; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  High prevalence of ST131 isolates producing CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-14 among extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates from Canada.

Authors:  Gisele Peirano; David Richardson; Jana Nigrin; Allison McGeer; Vivian Loo; Baldwin Toye; Michelle Alfa; Colette Pienaar; Pamela Kibsey; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activities of moxifloxacin against 900 aerobic and anaerobic surgical isolates from patients with intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Candace J Krepel; Gary R Seabrook; Lewis R Somberg; Atilla Nakeeb; Robert A Cambria; Jonathan B Towne
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Integrating Escherichia coli antimicrobial susceptibility data from multiple surveillance programs.

Authors:  John M Stelling; Karin Travers; Ronald N Jones; Philip J Turner; Thomas F O'Brien; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  [New antibiotics prior to approval: is this the end of the innovative stagnation?].

Authors:  J R Bogner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Clinical importance and epidemiology of quinolone resistance.

Authors:  Eu Suk Kim; David C Hooper
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2014-12-29

3.  Association of levofloxacin resistance with mortality in adult patients with invasive pneumococcal diseases: a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort.

Authors:  C-I Kang; J-H Song; S H Kim; D R Chung; K R Peck; V Thamlikitkul; H Wang; T M So; P-R Hsueh; R M Yasin; C C Carlos; P H Van; J Perera
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Suppression of Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation Accounts for Paradoxical Bacterial Survival at High Quinolone Concentration.

Authors:  Gan Luan; Yuzhi Hong; Karl Drlica; Xilin Zhao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aerosolized antibacterial agents in chronically infected cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Axel Dalhoff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  High rates of quinolone-resistant strains of Shigella sonnei in HIV-infected MSM.

Authors:  C Hoffmann; H Sahly; A Jessen; P Ingiliz; H-J Stellbrink; S Neifer; K Schewe; S Dupke; A Baumgarten; A Kuschel; I Krznaric
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  Fatal case of necrotizing fasciitis due to Myroides odoratus.

Authors:  N F Crum-Cianflone; R W Matson; G Ballon-Landa
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Fluoroquinolone-based protocols for eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Antonio Rispo; Pietro Capone; Fabiana Castiglione; Luigi Pasquale; Matilde Rea; Nicola Caporaso
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Bacillus anthracis GrlAV96A topoisomerase IV, a quinolone resistance mutation that does not affect the water-metal ion bridge.

Authors:  Katie J Aldred; Erin J Breland; Sylvia A McPherson; Charles L Turnbough; Robert J Kerns; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Early Clinical Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Finafloxacin Compared to Ciprofloxacin in Subsets of Microbiologically Characterized Isolates.

Authors:  Andreas Vente; Christine Bentley; Mark Lückermann; Paul Tambyah; Axel Dalhoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.