| Literature DB >> 32138263 |
Ying Liu1,2, Guohui Wu3, Rongrong Lu3, Rong Ou4, Ling Hu1, Yiping Yin5, Yangchang Zhang1, Hongjia Yan5, Yong Zhao5, Yetao Luo1, Mengliang Ye1,5.
Abstract
While studies on human immunodeficiency virus self-testing (HIVST) continue to accumulate after the World Health Organization's recommendation of HIVST as an additional approach to HIV testing services in 2016, few studies have focused on men who have sex with men (MSM) in Chinese cities. A cross-sectional study was conducted to describe the HIVST status of MSM in Chongqing, China. MSM participants were recruited by random sampling, and qualified interviewers collected data, using confidential self-administered questionnaires. Blood specimens were collected for HIV antibody detection. The survey evaluated the uptake and accuracy of HIVST kits and identified factors that may be associated with HIVST. The proportion of HIVST uptake was 15.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of HIVST were 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.6%-80.7%) and 99.0% (95% CI 96.9%-99.7%), respectively. The consistency between the HIVST kit and antibody detection results was 90.5% (95% CI 87.5%-93.0%), and the Kappa value was 0.777 (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of self-testing kits is 80.9% and the negative predictive value is 17.7%. Having been tested ≥2 times in the last year, higher educational levels, and higher scores of basic HIV/AIDS knowledge facilitated higher uptake of HIVST. Self-reported existing barriers for HIVST uptake included older age, marital status, and having resided in Chongqing for more than two years.Entities:
Keywords: HIV self-testing (HIVST); accuracy; factors; men who have sex with men (MSM)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32138263 PMCID: PMC7084434 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow diagram showing the study design, as well as the development of the final study population.
Constructs of basic HIV/AIDS knowledge.
| Constructs | Items |
|---|---|
| Basic knowledge | Is AIDS an incurable severe infectious disease? |
| Are MSM a group of people who are currently the most severely affected by HIV in China? | |
| Can you identify a positive patient by their appearance? | |
| Do sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) increase the risk of HIV infection? | |
| Does using a condom correctly protect against HIV transmission? | |
| Does using new drugs (methamphetamine, ecstasy, K powder, and so on) increase the risk of HIV infection? | |
| Should HIV testing and counseling be actively sought-after high-risk behaviors (needle sharing, drug use, unsafe sex, etc.)? | |
| Does intentional transmission of HIV/AIDS bear legal responsibility? |
Characteristics and HIV self-testing (HIVST) uptake of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Chongqing, China (n = 3017).
| Characteristics | All Participants | Uptake of HIVST (n = 470) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 3017) | n | Percent (95% CI) | |
|
| |||
| 18–26 years old | 1272 | 254 | 20.0% (17.8%–22.3%) |
| 27–36 years old | 1283 | 179 | 14.0% (12.1%–16.0%) |
| 37–76 years old | 462 | 36 | 7.8% (5.5%–10.6%) |
|
| |||
| Unmarried | 2623 | 439 | 16.7% (15.3%–18.2%) |
| Married | 392 | 30 | 7.7% (5.2%–10.7%) |
|
| |||
| Han | 2990 | 463 | 15.5% (14.2%–16.8%) |
| Minority | 27 | 6 | 22.2% (8.6%–42.3%) |
|
| |||
| Chongqing | 2397 | 342 | 14.3% (12.9%–15.7%) |
| Other provinces | 620 | 127 | 20.5% (17.4%–23.9%) |
|
| |||
| <1 year | 89 | 22 | 24.7% (16.2%–35.0%) |
| 1–2 years | 63 | 11 | 17.5% (9.1%–29.1%) |
| >2 years | 2865 | 436 | 15.2% (13.9%–16.6%) |
|
| |||
| Junior high school and below | 235 | 19 | 8.1% (4.9%–12.3%) |
| High school or technical secondary school | 639 | 97 | 15.2% (12.5%–18.2%) |
| College and above | 2142 | 353 | 16.5% (14.9%–18.1%) |
|
| |||
| Homosexual | 2480 | 415 | 16.7% (15.3%–18.3%) |
| Heterosexual | 3 | 0 | |
| Bisexual | 481 | 45 | 9.4% (6.9%–12.3%) |
| Undetermined | 52 | 9 | 17.3% (8.2%–30.3%) |
|
| |||
| 0–1 time | 1900 | 321 | 16.1% (14.5%–17.8%) |
| ≥2 times | 374 | 148 | 39.6% (34.6%–44.7%) |
|
| |||
| 0–5 | 241 | 23 | 9.5% (6.1%–14.0%) |
| 6–8 | 2776 | 446 | 16.1% (14.7%–17.5%) |
Detection results according to type of test (n = 463).
| HIV Antibody Detection Results | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Participant self-testing result | |||
| Positive | 118 | 3 | 121 |
| Negative | 41 | 301 | 342 |
| Total | 159 | 304 | 463 |
Note: Excluding “I do not know” results; concordance: 90.5% (95% CI 87.5%–93.0%); sensitivity: 74.2% (95% CI 66.6%–80.7%); specificity = 99.0% (95% CI 96.9%–99.7%); Kappa = 0.777(p < 0.001).
Logistic regression analysis of the factors affecting HIVST among MSM in Chongqing, China.
| Variable | Estimated Parameter | OR 1 | 95.0% CI | aOR 2 | 95.0% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 18–26 years old | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 27–36 years old | −0.43 | 0.65 | 0.53–0.80 | 0.65 | 0.53–0.81 | |
| ≥37 years old | −1.08 | 0.34 | 0.24–0.49 | 0.37 | 0.26–0.55 | |
|
| ||||||
| Junior high school and below | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High school or secondary school | 0.71 | 0.007 * | 2.04 | 1.21–3.41 | 1.62 | 0.96–2.75 |
| College and above | 0.81 | 0.001 * | 2.24 | 1.38–3.64 | 1.67 | 1.02–2.75 |
|
| ||||||
| Unmarried | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Married | −0.89 | 0.41 | 0.28–0.61 | 0.64 | 0.42–0.98 | |
|
| ||||||
| Han ethnicity | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Minor ethnicity | 0.44 | 0.340 | 1.56 | 0.63–3.88 | 1.50 | 0.60–3.78 |
|
| ||||||
| <1 year | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 1–2 years | −0.44 | 0.287 | 0.64 | 0.29–1.45 | 0.61 | 0.27–1.37 |
| >2 years | −0.60 | 0.016 * | 0.55 | 0.33–0.89 | 0.58 | 0.35–0.95 |
|
| ||||||
| 0–5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 6–8 | 0.60 | 0.008 * | 1.8 | 1.17–2.82 | 1.66 | 1.06–2.61 |
|
| ||||||
| Never | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Sometimes | 0.13 | 0.657 | 1.14 | 0.64–2.03 | 1.07 | 0.60–1.93 |
| Every time | −0.25 | 0.401 | 0.78 | 0.44–1.39 | 0.73 | 0.41–1.131 |
|
| ||||||
| Zero | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| One | 0.16 | 0.376 | 1.17 | 0.83–1.66 | 1.20 | 0.84–1.71 |
| Two | 0.15 | 0.456 | 1.17 | 0.78–1.74 | 1.18 | 0.79–1.778 |
| More than three | 0.29 | 0.365 | 1.34 | 0.71–2.52 | 1.47 | 0.78–2.80 |
|
| ||||||
| 0–1 time | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| ≥2 times | 1.23 | 3.41 | 2.68–4.33 | 3.34 | 2.62–4.25 | |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 0.280 | 0.482 | 1.32 | 0.61–2.88 | 1.29 | 0.59–2.82 |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 0.46 | 0.88 | 1.58 | 0.93–2.69 | 1.54 | 0.90–2.62 |
1 OR, odds ratio; 2 aOR, adjusted odds ratio: aORs for age and highest level of education were adjusted for each other only; aORs for all other variables were adjusted for age, highest level of education, and each other. * p < 0.05.