Literature DB >> 22905688

A visible response to an invisible tattoo.

Matthew Tsang1, Amanda Marsch, Katrina Bassett, Whitney High, James Fitzpatrick, Lori Prok.   

Abstract

Invisible (or blacklight) tattoos are fast becoming the trend in the world of tattoo art, and with their rise comes the onset of associated complications. Though there have been many reports of cutaneous reactions to traditional tattoo pigments, literature regarding reactions to invisible tattoos is scarce. We report the case of a 28-year-old man who presented with an inflammatory eruption of 2 months' duration confined to the area of a recently placed invisible tattoo; the eruption was diagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis to a foreign material. Under fluorescent light, a refractile foreign material was identified in the biopsy specimen, which we believe to be melamine, one of the invisible tattoo's five ingredients. Previous cases of cutaneous reactions to invisible tattoos were attributed to polymethylmethacrylate, not a component of the tattoo in this case. To our knowledge, this is the first case implicating melamine as the cause of a granulomatous tattoo reaction. Given the rising popularity of invisible tattoos, we present this case to raise awareness of the risks associated with this alternative tattoo trend.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22905688     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2012.01961.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Pathol        ISSN: 0303-6987            Impact factor:   1.587


  1 in total

1.  Tracking tumor radiotherapy response in vivo with Cherenkov-excited luminescence ink imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer A Soter; Ethan P M LaRochelle; Brook K Byrd; Irwin I Tendler; Jason R Gunn; Boyu Meng; Rendy R Strawbridge; Dennis J Wirth; Scott C Davis; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.