Literature DB >> 32135089

Ethical Issues Posed by Field Research Using Highly Portable and Cloud-Enabled Neuroimaging.

Francis X Shen1, Susan M Wolf2, Ramon Gilberto Gonzalez3, Michael Garwood4.   

Abstract

Highly portable, cloud-enabled neuroimaging technologies will fundamentally change neuroimaging research. Instead of participants traveling to the scanner, the scanner will now come to them. Field-based brain imaging research, including populations underrepresented in neuroscience research to date, will enlarge and diversify databases and pave the way for clinical and direct-to-consumer (DTC) applications. Yet these technological developments urgently require analysis of their ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). No consensus ethical frameworks for mobile neuroimaging exist, and existing policies for traditional MRI research are inadequate. Based on literature review and ethics analysis of neurotechnology development efforts, Shen et al. identify seven foundational, yet unresolved, ELSI issues posed by portable neuroimaging: (1) informed consent; (2) privacy; (3) capacity to accurately communicate neuroimaging results to remote participants; (4) extensive reliance on cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) for data analysis; (5) potential bias of interpretive algorithms in diverse populations; (6) return of research results and incidental (or secondary) findings to research participants; and (7) responding to participant requests for access to their data. The article proposes a path forward to address these urgent issues.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; MEG; MRI; PET; artificial intelligence; bias; bioethics; diverse populations; fMRI; fNIRS; informed consent; neuroethics; neuroimaging; privacy; research ethics; return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32135089      PMCID: PMC8803403          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  10 in total

1.  The regulation of MR neuroimaging research: disentangling the Gordian knot.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kulynych
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2007

2.  Emerging ethical challenges in advanced neuroimaging research: review, recommendations and research agenda.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Judy Illes
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Defending the return of results and data.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society.

Authors:  James Eberwine; Jeffrey Kahn
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

6.  Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators.

Authors:  Melanie B Shulman; Kristin Harkins; Robert C Green; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Low-Cost High-Performance MRI.

Authors:  Mathieu Sarracanie; Cristen D LaPierre; Najat Salameh; David E J Waddington; Thomas Witzel; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Evolution of universal review and disclosure of MRI reports to research participants.

Authors:  Jody M Shoemaker; Caitlin Cole; Linda E Petree; Deborah L Helitzer; Mark T Holdsworth; John P Gluck; John P Phillips
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Identification of individual subjects on the basis of their brain anatomical features.

Authors:  Seyed Abolfazl Valizadeh; Franziskus Liem; Susan Mérillat; Jürgen Hänggi; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  B1 -gradient-based MRI using frequency-modulated Rabi-encoded echoes.

Authors:  Efraín Torres; Taylor Froelich; Paul Wang; Lance DelaBarre; Michael Mullen; Gregory Adriany; Daniel Cosmo Pizetta; Mateus José Martins; Edson Luiz Géa Vidoto; Alberto Tannús; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Short report on research trends during the COVID-19 pandemic and use of telehealth interventions and remote brain research in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Wan-Chun Su; Sudha Srinivasan; Corina Cleffi; Anjana Bhat
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2021-04-09

3.  A Study of Cloud-Based Remote Clinical Care Technology.

Authors:  Bo Lin; Wei Huang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.