Juliane N B D Pelin1,2, Charlotte J C Edwards-Gayle1, Valeria Castelletto1, Andrea M Aguilar3, Wendel A Alves2, Jani Seitsonen4, Janne Ruokolainen4, Ian W Hamley1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AD, U.K. 2. Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André 09210-580, Brazil. 3. Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema 09972-270, Brazil. 4. Nanomicroscopy Center, Aalto University, Puumiehenkuja 2, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland.
Abstract
The self-assembly of the amphiphilic lipopeptide PAEPKI-C16 (P = proline, A = alanine, E = glutamic acid, K = lysine, I = isoleucine, and C16 = hexadecyl) was investigated using a combination of microscopy, spectroscopy, and scattering methods and compared to that of C16-IKPEAP with the same (reversed) peptide sequence and the alkyl chain positioned at the N-terminus and lacking a free N-terminal proline residue. The catalytic activity of these peptides was then compared using a model aldol reaction system. For PAEPKI-C16, the cryo-TEM images showed the formation of micrometer-length fibers, which by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were found to have radii of 2.5-2.6 nm. Spectroscopic analysis shows that these fibers are built from β-sheets. This behavior is in complete contrast to that of C16-IKPEAP, which forms spherical micelles with peptides in a disordered conformation [Hutchinson J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 613]. In PAEPKI-C16, spontaneous alignment of fibers was observed upon increasing pH, which was accompanied by observed birefringence and anisotropy of SAXS patterns. This shows the ability to form a nematic phase, and unprecedented nematic hydrogel formation was also observed for these lipopeptides at sufficiently high concentrations. SAXS shows retention of an ultrafine (1.7 nm core radius) fibrillar network within the hydrogel. PAEPKI-C16 with free N-terminal proline shows enhanced anti:syn diastereoselectivity and better conversion compared to C16-IKPEAP. The cytotoxicity of PAEPKI-C16 was also lower than that of C16-IKPEAP for both fibroblast and cancer cell lines. These results highlight the sensitivity of lipopeptide properties to the presence of a free proline residue. The spontaneous nematic phase formation by PAEPKI-C16 points to the high anisotropy of its ultrafine fibrillar structure, and the formation of such a phase at low concentrations in aqueous solution may be valuable for future applications.
The self-assembly of the amphiphilic lipopeptidePAEPKI-C16 (P = proline, A = alanine, E = glutamic acid, K = lysine, I = isoleucine, and C16 = hexadecyl) was investigated using a combination of microscopy, spectroscopy, and scattering methods and compared to that of C16-IKPEAP with the same (reversed) peptide sequence and the alkyl chain positioned at the N-terminus and lacking a free N-terminal proline residue. The catalytic activity of these peptides was then compared using a model aldol reaction system. For PAEPKI-C16, the cryo-TEM images showed the formation of micrometer-length fibers, which by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were found to have radii of 2.5-2.6 nm. Spectroscopic analysis shows that these fibers are built from β-sheets. This behavior is in complete contrast to that of C16-IKPEAP, which forms spherical micelles with peptides in a disordered conformation [Hutchinson J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 613]. In PAEPKI-C16, spontaneous alignment of fibers was observed upon increasing pH, which was accompanied by observed birefringence and anisotropy of SAXS patterns. This shows the ability to form a nematic phase, and unprecedented nematic hydrogel formation was also observed for these lipopeptides at sufficiently high concentrations. SAXS shows retention of an ultrafine (1.7 nm core radius) fibrillar network within the hydrogel. PAEPKI-C16 with free N-terminal proline shows enhanced anti:syn diastereoselectivity and better conversion compared to C16-IKPEAP. The cytotoxicity of PAEPKI-C16 was also lower than that of C16-IKPEAP for both fibroblast and cancer cell lines. These results highlight the sensitivity of lipopeptide properties to the presence of a free proline residue. The spontaneous nematic phase formation by PAEPKI-C16 points to the high anisotropy of its ultrafine fibrillar structure, and the formation of such a phase at low concentrations in aqueous solution may be valuable for future applications.
Organocatalysts
incorporating l-proline residues have been employed in asymmetric
catalysis for a wide range of synthetic reactions.[1] Proline-based organocatalysts containing long hydrophobic
chains have been found to catalyze aldol reactions in reaction mixtures
containing both water and organic solvents.[2] A lipidated peptide with a C16 (hexadecyl, palmitoyl)
chain attached at the C-terminus and a proline-based head group (PRW-C16) was found to have high catalytic activity for aldol reactions
performed in water, with very good stereoselectivity and conversion
rates.[3] The lipidated peptide self-assembles
in the form of spherical micelles above a critical aggregation concentration
(cac), and the self-assembled structures are responsible for catalytic
properties, since poor results were obtained in the absence of lipidated
assembles. In another example, Escuder et al. studied aldol reactions
catalyzed by l-proline-derived peptides that form organogels[4] or hydrogels.[5]Aldol reactions combine two carbonyl compounds to form a new C–C
bond, to produce a compound containing a β-hydroxy carbonyl
group,[6,7] which is found in living organisms and has
exceptional pharmacological activities. Since the 1970s, it has been
known that l-proline is a very efficient organocatalyst for
aldol reactions.[8] Many aldol reactions
involving l-proline are performed in organic solvents such
as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and chloroform, which are harmful and
environmentally unfavorable.[3] As a result,
there is a current drive to overcome this by replacing these solvents
with green solvents such as water. The use of water is also attractive
for promoting self-assembly via hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen
bonding. Lipidation of peptides commonly leads to self-assembly in
aqueous solution into a variety of nanostructures including micelles,
nanotapes, and nanofibrils.[9−12] Lipopeptides are a type of peptide amphiphile (PA).Recently, our group studied the effect of the substitution of an
ester with an amide linkage between the hydrophobic lipid chain and
the hydrated peptide head group in the PRW-C16 lipopeptide.[13] The linker group may influence the biocatalytic
activity because of differences in the local conformation around the
catalytic site and/or the polarization of the amide or ester linkages.
Aldol reactions using cyclohexanone and p-nitrobenzaldehyde
showed that PRW-NH-C16 has a high enantiomeric excess (88–89%)
and diastereoselectivity (93:7 anti:syn) compared to PRW-O-C16 (71–84%, 91:9). Both lipopeptides
self-assemble into spherical micelles. However, the spherical micelles
formed by PRW-NH-C16 are slightly larger than those of
PRW-O-C16, and this along with the configuration of the
tripeptide micellar corona leads to a higher conversion.Peptide
hormones are attracting interest as targets for novel therapeutics
and diagnostics. Some of us have recently been investigating the self-assembly
of derivatives of the human gut hormone PYY3-36,
which is one of the pancreatic peptides and is a therapeutic target
for obesity since it is a signal of satiety following food intake.[14−17] The self-assembly of lipidated and PEGylated analogues, which were
designed to have enhanced stability and circulation time, was investigated.
Lipidated PYY3-36 peptides can form spherical micelles
or fibrils depending on the nature of the lipid chain and the solution
pH.[18,19] The PEGylated PYY3-36 variants
studied formed irregular aggregates.[19]Fragment peptides may retain significant activity of the parent full-sequence
peptide but with improved ease of synthesis and cost-effectiveness.
We therefore examined lipopeptides containing PYY3-36 fragments. We recently studied the self-assembly of C16-IKPEAP and C16-IKPEAPGE, which contain N-terminal hexameric
and octameric sequences from PYY3-36.[20] Both these lipopeptides form spherical micelles
that are stable over a wide pH range, above defined critical aggregation
concentrations. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy showed that the
lipidated peptides have disordered structures, in contrast to the
polyproline II (PPII) conformation of the peptides themselves. Notably,
upon drying these samples, β-sheet fibrillar (“amyloid-like”)
fibrils are observed.[20]Here, we
study a related variant of PYY3-36, with a palmitoyl
chain (hexadecyl, C16) attached to the peptide head group
at the C-terminus. The peptide sequence is PAEPKI (Scheme ), which is the reverse of
IKPEAP, the C-terminal hexapeptide from PYY3-36.
Scheme 1
Molecular Structures of (Top) PAEPKI-C16 and (Bottom)
C16-IKPEAP
As shown in Scheme , PAEPKI-C16 differs from C16-IKPEAP for two
reasons: first, the P residue is free at the N terminus (unlike C-terminal
P-COOH in C16-IKPEAP), and second, the palmitoyl chain
is attached C terminally via CONH rather than via the NHCO-C15H31 N-terminal linkage in C16-IKPEAP.PAEPKI-C16 was synthesized to have a free terminal P residue
in order to study its activity as a proline-based organocatalyst of
a model aldol reaction. Results from this investigation are presented
herein. In addition, we examine the self-assembly of the lipopeptide
by first determining the cac using fluorescence probe assays. The
conformation of the peptide is then studied using CD spectroscopy
and X-ray diffraction, and the self-assembled structure is determined
using small-angle X-ray scattering. The results are compared to those
previously reported for C16-IKPEAP.[20] We unexpectedly found that at a sufficiently high concentration,
PAEPKI-C16 spontaneously forms a nematic phase in water,
and this lyotropic liquid crystal phase is a rarely reported structure
for lipopeptides;[21−24] to the best of our knowledge, nematic hydrogels have not been previously
reported. We then investigate the organocatalytic activity of PAEPKI-C16 using a model aldol reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde
and cyclohexanone, and the results are compared to those for C16-IKPEAP previously reported elsewhere.[13]In addition, the cytotoxicity and anticancer activity
of PAEPKI-C16 are examined and compared to the corresponding
measurements for C16-IKPEAP. PYY3-36 is
an agonist for the Y2 receptor, which is a G-protein-coupled
receptor. Y2 receptors are known to play a role in tumor
development and are recognized as tumor markers overexpressed on the
surface of cancer cells.[25] Therefore, PYY3-36 derivatives may have potential in cancer therapeutics.
In addition, proline metabolism plays a key role in cancer, with an
important connection to genes regulating the p53 tumor suppressor
protein,[26] and as such, this pathway has
emerged as a potential cancer therapy target.[27] Conjugation of a free proline to a short lipidated peptide as in
PAEPKI-C16 may provide a substrate with anticancer activity,
which is investigated herein in an initial study using breast cancer
cells. Its cytotoxicity is compared to that against fibroblasts.
Materials and Methods
Materials
PAEPKI-C16 (TFA salt) was synthesized by PeptideSynthetics, U.K. The
molecular weight determined by mass spectrometry was 877.20 g mol–1 (expected: 877.2 g mol–1), and
the purity by HPLC was >95.0%. C16-IKPEAP (ammonium
acetate salt) was synthesized by PeptideSynthetics, U.K. The molecular
weight determined by mass spectrometry was 892.18 g mol–1 (expected: 891.60 g mol–1), and the purity by
HPLC was >95.0%.
Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Fluorescence
spectra were recorded as described previously.[28] ANS assays were performed using 3.25 × 10–4 to 0.13 wt % peptide in 2.1 × 10–3 wt % 8-anilino-1-napthalenesulfonic
acid (ANS) solution. Pyrene assays were performed using 3.25 ×
10–4 to 0.13 wt % peptide in 2.167 × 10–5 wt % pyrene solution.
Fourier-Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FTIR)
FTIR spectra were recorded as described
previously.[28] Samples containing 1 and
2 wt % lipopeptides in D2O at pH native, 8, and 12 were
measured using CaF2 plate windows with a 6 μm spacer.
The spectra were scanned 118 times over the range of 4000 to 500 cm–1 and at a resolution of 4 cm–1.
An averaged D2O spectrum was used as the background, and
its signal was subtracted from the experimental data.
Circular Dichroism
(CD)
CD spectra were recorded as described previously.[29] Quartz plaques (0.1 and 0.01 mm thick) were
used for the experiments at native pH, pH 8 and pH 12.Ellipticity
is reported as the mean residue ellipticity ([θ], in degrees
cm2 dmol–1) and calculated as [θ]
= [θ]obs MRW/10cl, where [θ]obs is the ellipticity measured in millidegrees, MRW is the
mean residue molecular weight of the peptide (molecular weight divided
by the number of amino acid residues), c is the concentration
of the sample in mg/mL, and l is the optical path
length of the cell in centimeters.
Cryogenic Transmission
Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM)
Cryo-TEM images were obtained
as described previously.[28]
Small-Angle
X-ray Scattering (SAXS)
SAXS experiments were performed on
the bioSAXS beamline B21 at Diamond Light Source, U.K., as described
previously.[28]
Aldol Reactions in Water
Cyclohexanone (0.9 mmol, 85 μL) was added to the peptide
catalysts (3.3 μmol, 3.0 mg), varying the amount of water (170
μL, 85 μL, and in the absence). p-Nitrobenzaldehyde
(67.9 μmol, 10.3 mg) was added, and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 3 days before being extracted with
ethyl acetate four times. For the experiment containing no water,
0.5 mL of water was added to the system before extraction, to help
in the phase separation. NMR measurements using a (1H)
Bruker Ultrashield 300 were performed at 300 MHz with a deuterated
chloroform solvent. The yield and diastereomer anti:syn ratio were calculated using the NMR spectrum obtained, where tetramethylsilane
(TMS) was used as a reference. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.22–8.18 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.51–7.47
(m, 2H, ArH); 5.47 (br s, 1H, CHOH-syn); 4.89 (dd, J = 7.5 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 1H, CHOH-anti); 4.08 (d, J = 3.0 Hz,
1H, CHOH-anti); 2.66–2.30
(m, 1H, CHCHOH); 2.66–2.30 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)); 2.16–1.24 (m, 6H, chex-H).
Cytocompatibility
Studies
In vitro cell culture was carried out using HCT-116
(ECAAC humancolorectal tumor cell line) and HDFa (human dermal fibroblast
cells). HCT-116 was cultured in McCoys 5A modified medium with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (ThermoScientific,
100×). HDFa cells were cultured in DMEM F12 media supplemented
with 5% FBS, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and 100 μg/mL
insulin. The cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2 at 37 °C.The effect of C16-IKPEAP
and PAEPKI-C16 on cell viability was assessed using an
MTT (3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)
assay. The cells were seeded into a 96-well plate and incubated for
24 h, to allow the cells to adhere at a seeding density of either
1 × 104 or 4 × 104 cells/mL for HCT-116
and HDFa, respectively. After this, a total volume of 100 μL
of the peptide dissolved in complete medium was added, to yield final
peptide concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 4 × 10–4 wt %. Negative controls containing 100 μL of complete medium
were also included. After 67 h of incubation, 20 μL of MTT (0.5
wt % in PBS) was added to each well plate and allowed to incubate
for 5 h (total of 72 h incubation). After this, the solutions were
removed from the wells and replaced with 100 μL of DMSO and
incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was read using a microplate reader
(λ = 570 nm). The absorbance readings were compared against
the negative control to obtain %viability. Data are fitted with a
sigmoidal line as a guide to the eye. Statistical tests, ANOVA, and
Bonferroni correction, were used to assess significance.
Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM)
The 3 wt % pH 8 hydrogel was immersed in
a fixative solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 60 min at 5
°C. This was followed by gradual dehydration from 10 to 100%
ethanol (10, 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% ethanol), with 30 s time intervals
between each step. The sample was then extracted from the 100% ethanol
solution and subjected to critical point drying. The dried material
was placed on a stub covered with a carbon tab (Agar Scientific, U.K.),
and then coated with gold. An FEI Quanta FEG 600 environmental scanning
electron microscope (SEM) in high vacuum mode (20 kV high tension)
was used to study and record SEM images.
Electrospinning
Electrospinning was performed using a syringe connected to a 25 kV
voltage power supply (Glassman Inc.) and a syringe pump (Kd Scientific
Model 200 Series). An aliquot of 1 mL of the 5 wt % hydrogel was used
for electrospinning at a distance between the needle and collector
of 10 cm in a 1 mL/h flow. One TEM grid was attached to the aluminum
plate, and after drying at room temperature, TEM images were obtained
as described above.
Results and Discussion
The critical
aggregation concentration (cac) for the peptidePAEPKI-C16 at three different pH values (native, 8, and 12) was determined
using a 2.2 × 10–5 wt % pyrene solution as
the fluorescent probe. Considering the emission band located approximately
at 393 nm and comparing these results as a function of the logarithm
of the peptide concentration, it is possible to determine the cac
by break points in the concentration dependent intensities (Figure a). The fluorescence
spectra can be seen in Figure S1. A similar
cac was observed for the samples at native pH and pH 8, being (3.3
± 0.2) × 10–3 wt % and (3.2 ± 0.2)
× 10–3 wt %, respectively, suggesting that
self-assembly occurs similarly for both systems. In basic conditions
(pH 12), a slight enhancement of the cac to (4.0 ± 0.2) ×
10–3 wt % was observed, suggesting that hydrophobicity
decreases as the pH is increased. For comparison, C16-IKPEAP
has a similar cac (2.9 ± 0.2) × 10–3 wt
% at native pH.[20]
Figure 1
(a) Comparison of the
concentration dependence of PAEPKI-C16 and the pyrene fluorescence
I (393 nm). The inflection point of the curve intersection corresponds
to the cac of each sample. (b) FTIR data of 2 wt % D2O
solutions of the peptide, considering different concentrations and
pH.
(a) Comparison of the
concentration dependence of PAEPKI-C16 and the pyrene fluorescence
I (393 nm). The inflection point of the curve intersection corresponds
to the cac of each sample. (b) FTIR data of 2 wt % D2O
solutions of the peptide, considering different concentrations and
pH.In order to study the secondary
structure under distinct environmental conditions, including peptide
concentration, pH, and temperature variation, FTIR and CD experiments
were performed. The results are shown, respectively, in Figures b and 2. The FTIR spectra in the amide I′ and II′ regions
are presented in Figure b. For all samples, the characteristic bands are located at 1628–1636
cm–1 (peaks 1 and 2) and at 1553–1554 cm–1 (peaks 3 and 4). The former are assigned to β-sheet
structure.[30−32] Considering the first set of peaks, the sample at
native pH contains a peak at 1636 cm–1 (peak 1), whereas the other samples show peak 2 located at 1628 cm–1. This effect suggests a higher β-sheet content
for the pH 8 and pH 12 samples. The broad underlying peak shape, however,
indicates an inhomogeneous ensemble with possible contributions from
other structures such as poly(proline II).[33]
Figure 2
CD
spectra for 0.04 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions at the
pH conditions shown.
CD
spectra for 0.04 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions at the
pH conditions shown.Peaks 3 and 4 are in
the range of the amide II band in H2O; however, this is
shifted to wavenumbers below 1500 cm–1 in D2O.[34] Therefore, these peaks are
assigned mainly to the side-chain asymmetric stretch vibrations of
the COO– groups in the E residues, which give a
peak at 1567 cm–1 in D2O.[31,32] A fraction of residual H2O in the solutions may also
lead to a component of amide II features.Figure shows the CD spectra of 0.04 wt % solutions
at 20 °C, which show a minimum at 207, 213, and 216 nm, respectively,
for native, pH 8, and pH 12, consistent with β-sheet structures.[35−37] The spectra do not contain the typical maximum observed just below
200 nm for typical β-sheet structures and in fact somewhat resemble
the spectra observed for poly(l-proline) at high temperatures.[38] However, the presence of β-sheet structures
is independently confirmed both by the FTIR spectra and the formation
of fibril structures, as will be discussed shortly. Upon increasing
the concentration of the peptide to 0.5 wt % at 20 °C, the location
of the minima in the spectra shifted to 232, 229, and 226 nm (Figure S2). The red shift of the peak position
may be due to increased twisting of the β-sheets, along with
potential light scattering from the suspensions of highly extended
fibers (vide infra).[39] Upon heating these
systems from 20 to 80 °C, differences in the negative band intensity
were seen (Figure S2). At native conditions,
the increase of the temperature promoted a gradual enhancement of
the minimum. The opposite effect occurred at pH 8, which showed a
decrease in the minimum intensity with the increasing temperature.
A very large minimum was observed for the sample at pH 12 at low temperatures,
which is due to the formation of highly extended fibrils, as will
be discussed shortly.Cryo-TEM was used to image self-assembled
structures, and the images can be seen in Figure . These show the formation of fibrils, with
a population of oligomers at native pH. With the increase of pH, more
fibers are observed. The fibrils extend to micrometers in length (Figure S3), especially at high pH. In addition,
an increase in fiber thickness can be observed at high pH along with
an increase in the alignment of the fibrils.
Figure 3
Cryo-TEM images of 1
wt % PAEPKI-C16 at (a) native, (b) pH 8, and (c) pH 12.
Cryo-TEM images of 1
wt % PAEPKI-C16 at (a) native, (b) pH 8, and (c) pH 12.To further investigate the self-assembled fibril
structure, SAXS was performed. The SAXS intensity profiles were fitted
using the long cylinder shell form factor and Gaussian size distribution
from the SASfit[40] package, producing fits
shown as red lines in Figure a. Table S1 summarizes the fitted
parameters. The length of the cylinders (L) was fixed
at 1000 nm (with L ≫ R, this
parameter only represents a scaling parameter), and the scattering
length density of the solvent (ηsolv) was fixed.
The cylinder radius (R) was 2.15 ± 0.2 nm, independent
of pH. However, an increase of the shell thickness (ΔR) from 0.3 to 0.5 nm is observed with increasing pH (this
corresponds to only the outer residues of the peptide, some of which
are part of the “core”). In the low q vector region, the SAXS curves show differences for horizontal and
vertical scattering, especially at high pH, as can be seen in Figure S4. This anisotropy in the low q SAXS patterns is due to the formation of spontaneously
aligned nematic liquid crystal structures, as will be discussed shortly.
Figure 4
(a) SAXS
data (gray symbols) and fitted form factors using a long cylindrical
shell model (red lines) for 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions,
varying the pH. (b) Images of the birefringence of the samples in
vials placed between crossed polarizers.
(a) SAXS
data (gray symbols) and fitted form factors using a long cylindrical
shell model (red lines) for 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions,
varying the pH. (b) Images of the birefringence of the samples in
vials placed between crossed polarizers.Another important effect monitored was the electron density distribution
in the self-assembled structures. Considering the scattering length
density of the core (ηcore) and shell (ηshell), it was observed (Table S1) that the higher the pH, the higher is the core density and the
lower is the shell density, pointing to the formation of more compact
structures at high pH.Since cryo-TEM shows the presence of
aligned fibers and SAXS in 1 wt % aqueous solutions also indicates
significant sample anisotropy, the macroscopic sample birefringence
was examined for samples placed in glass flasks between crossed polarizers.
An increase of the birefringence is observed with increasing pH, as
shown in Figure b.
In this case, the native system was the only system that did not present
anisotropy.We reasoned that since PAEPKI-C16 self-assembles
into highly extended fibrils, it might be possible to form hydrogels
at a sufficiently high concentration due to the formation of (noncovalently)
cross-linked fibrillar networks. Upon increasing the peptide concentration
to 5 wt %, only the pH 8 sample (Figure ) spontaneously formed a soft hydrogel at
room temperature. The other samples (native and pH 12) were subjected
to a heating–cooling process, and after this, the pH 12 sample
formed a hydrogel, while the native remained in solution, as can be
seen in Figure . The
tube inversion test shows the existence of (finite yield stress) hydrogels.
Figure 5
Images
of 5 wt % PAEPKI-C16 solutions at native, pH 8, and pH
12.
Images
of 5 wt % PAEPKI-C16 solutions at native, pH 8, and pH
12.The fibrillar structure of the
hydrogels was confirmed through a combination of SEM, SAXS, and TEM,
as shown in Figure . The SEM image in Figure a shows a fibrillar network structure. SAXS data from gels
showed form factor features (Figure b), which could be fitted with the same cylindrical
shell form factor model as for solutions, with a similar fibril core
radius and shell thicknesses (Table S2).
This shows that the hydrogels are formed from a network of ultrafine
peptide fibrils, with a radius of approximately 2 nm. As for solutions,
the PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels also showed birefringence, which
was higher at pH 12, as can be seen in Figure c, which shows gels suspended in liquid.
We also attempted to generate electrospun macroscopic fibers from
concentrated solutions of the lipopeptide, and although this was not
possible, we were able to image fibrils in the electrospun droplets
using TEM (Figure d).
Figure 6
(a) SEM image showing fiber structures in a pH 8 hydrogel. (b) SAXS
data (gray) and fitted form factor (red) using a cylindrical shell
model for 3 wt % PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels, at two pH values
indicated. (c) Images of the birefringence between crossed polarizers
of the 3 wt % samples. (d) Scheme of the electrospinning procedure
and TEM images of the electrospun 5 wt % gel samples.
(a) SEM image showing fiber structures in a pH 8 hydrogel. (b) SAXS
data (gray) and fitted form factor (red) using a cylindrical shell
model for 3 wt % PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels, at two pH values
indicated. (c) Images of the birefringence between crossed polarizers
of the 3 wt % samples. (d) Scheme of the electrospinning procedure
and TEM images of the electrospun 5 wt % gel samples.The importance of the availability of the proline residue
in peptide sequences for aldol reactions has been highlighted.[3] Also, in comparison with the recently studied
C16-IKPEAPlipopeptide, we monitored the efficiency of
PAEPKI-C16 as a catalyst in asymmetric aldol reactions
using p-nitrobenzaldehyde, cyclohexanone, and water,
presented in Scheme .
Scheme 2
Aldol Reaction Mechanism Using p-Nitrobenzaldehyde
and Cyclohexanone as Reagents, Catalyzed by PAEPKI-C16 at
Native pH
Table summarizes the conversion and stereoselectivity
of the aldol products, with comparison of both peptides. The NMR results
for entries 1, 2, and 3 can be seen in Figure S5. For these reactions, 5 mol % catalyst solutions were used,
with an excess of cyclohexanone (12 equiv), following the same experimental
methodology for C16-IKPEAP.[20] The assignment of the stereoisomers obtained was based on the literature.[42]
Table 1
Conversion and Diastereoselectivity
of the Direct Aldol Reaction of p-Nitrobenzaldehyde
and Cyclohexanone for PAEPKI-C16 Compared to the Peptide
Derivative C16-IKPEAP[20]
entrya
peptide
catalyst (mol %)
H2Ob (equiv)
conversionc (%)
anti:sync
1
PAEPKI-C16
5
2.0
7.9
78:22
2
5
1.0
8.7
81:19
3
5
0.0
56
84:16
4
C16-IKPEAP
5
2.0
3.6
15:85
5
5
1.0
10
51:49
6
5
0.0
34
36:64
The reactions
were performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring for 72 h.
Water excess in relation to
cyclohexanone (v/v).
Yield and diastereoselectivity were obtained by 1H NMR analysis of the gross product.
The reactions
were performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring for 72 h.Water excess in relation to
cyclohexanone (v/v).Yield and diastereoselectivity were obtained by 1H NMR analysis of the gross product.The influence of water on the catalyzed aldol reaction
was evaluated, and entries 1–3 and 6 were stabilized in solution,
while entries 4 and 5 form hydrogels during the reaction process.
The best conditions presented for both peptides are described in entries
3 and 6, which presented high conversion (56 and 34% for PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP, respectively) and good diastereoselectivity
(84:16 and 36:64). Based on this result, it was possible to conclude
that the absence of water in the reaction medium favored the formation
of the anti-aldol product, which can be related to
the access of the reagents to the proline residues in the organic
phase. PAEPKI-C16 shows enhanced diastereoselectivity compared
to C16-IKPEAP under all conditions examined and conversion
under conditions except 1 equiv of H2O, when it was slightly
lower than for C16-IKPEAP. These results show that the
molecular structure of the peptide influences the conversion and diastereoselectivity
of the reactions. Depending on the mode of self-assembly, the enamine
transition state formed can favor the attack of the ketone and aldehyde
at the catalytic surface, i.e., the proline-functionalized surface
of the self-assembled structures.Cytocompatibility studies
of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16 were performed
using an MTT assay on humanbreast cancer (MCF-7) and human dermal
fibroblast (HDFa) cells to determine cell viability (Figure ) and to examine whether there
was any selectivity toward cancer cells. HDFa was used as a control
cell line in order to observe whether there is a preferential effect
against the cancer cell line. The results are summarized in Table .
Figure 7
MTT assay of the viability
of fibroblasts (HDFa) and breast cancer MCF-7 cells as a function
of concentration of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16.
Table 2
Cytocompatibility
Results (IC50 Values) for C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16
C16-IKPEAP
PAEPKI-C16
cell line
wt %
μM
wt %
μM
HDFa
0.034
0.39
0.0084
0.10
MCF-7
0.055
0.63
0.0200
0.23
MTT assay of the viability
of fibroblasts (HDFa) and breast cancerMCF-7 cells as a function
of concentration of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16.A difference is noted in the IC50 values for C16-IKPEAP against MCF-7 and HDFa cells, corresponding to 0.021
wt % or 0.24 μM. However, PAEPKI-C16 exhibited a
stronger activity against HDFa than MCF-7. Generally, PAEPKI-C16 is more toxic than C16-IKPEAP, which is presumably
due to the different modes of self-assembly. The peptide residues
in PAEPKI-C16 are present at a high density on the surface
of highly elongated fibers, whereas those in C16-IKPEAP
are present on the surface of micelles.The difference in the
catalytic behavior and cytotoxicity is influenced by the very different
self-assembly properties of PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP. The enhanced catalytic activity is likely due to the high
density of the free prolines present at the surface of the fibrils
of PAEPKI-C16. The higher cytotoxicity of this lipopeptide
is also likely due to the formation of extended nanostructures. It
is known for polymeric and inorganic nanoparticles, for example, that
the shape of the nanostructure significantly influences cytotoxicity.[43−46] Among other effects, this can arise due to the different modes of
internalization of anisotropic particles. In a series of papers, the
Stupp group has highlighted that the presence of peptide motifs on
the surface of fibrils formed by lipopeptides enhances bioactivity.[47−49] The highly distinct modes of self-assembly of the two lipopeptides
studied here lead to significant differences in biocatalytic activity
and cytotoxicity. At the molecular level, this must be due to the
configuration of the peptide forming the surface corona of the nanostructures
and the linker group. The electrostatic repulsion of the C-terminal
P-COOH units in C16-IKPEAP is likely to favor the formation
of micelles, whereas this interaction is suppressed in PAEPKI-C16, and stacking of the hydrophobic terminal P and A residues
promotes β-sheet formation. This may also be favored by the
salt bridging interactions between the E and K residues in PAEPKI-C16, which are not hindered by the presence of the additional
C-terminal charge in C16-IKPEAP. It should be noted that
the increase in the fibril alignment and nematic phase birefringence
observed upon increasing pH is ascribed to the likely predominant
effect of pH on the charge of the lysine residue, the side chain of
which has a pKa of 10.5, although this
can be modified by the presence of other residues (for example, the
nearby glutamic acid residue).[50,51] Proline also has a
reported pKa of the amine group near pKa 11.[51] At high pH,
the lysine and proline residues will be deprotonated, leading to a
loss of the positive charges in the peptide, which may lead to increased
electrostatic interactions between the anionic glutamic acid residues
on peptides within the fibril, possibly causing an increased fibril
persistence length.
Conclusions
Our study shows many
significant differences in the self-assembly behavior and properties
when comparing lipopeptide homologues with reversed sequence and lipid
chain attachment. The results of PAEPKI-C16 presented here
show that it forms highly elongated β-sheet fibril structures,
especially at pH 8–12, in complete contrast to C16-IKPEAP, which has previously been shown to form spherical micelles.[20] The critical aggregation concentrations for
the two lipopeptides are similar; however, the aggregated structure
is very distinct. The formation of a nematic phase is only possible
with extended structures such as fibrils; therefore, it is not surprising
that this is not observed for C16-IKPEAP, which forms micellar
aggregates. The ability of PAEPKI-C16 to form hydrogels
(at sufficiently high pH) is also notable (and may be contrasted with
C16-IKPEAP). To the best of our knowledge, nematic hydrogels
have not been previously reported for self-assembling lipopeptides,
although they are known for amyloid-forming peptides.[52−54] It is evident that the gelation correlates with the formation of
highly extended fibrils, the presence of which within the hydrogels
is confirmed by in situ SAXS. The fibril network is based on ultrafine
fibers with a core radius of only 2 nm.The catalytic activity
of the two lipopeptides is also quite different, as demonstrated by
our model aldol reaction analysis. PAEPKI-C16 shows a significant
enhancement in diastereoselectivity compared to C16-IKPEAP
under the same reaction conditions. The conversion is also significantly
higher for PAEPKI-C16 under most conditions (with one exception, Table ). This is ascribed
to the presence of a free proline residue in PAEPKI-C16 in contrast to C16-IKPEAP with C-terminal amide-linked
proline.Remarkable significant differences in the cytotoxicity
of PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP were observed,
the former being substantially more cytotoxic (lower IC50) against
both fibroblast and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. This peptide shows
preferential activity against fibroblasts rather than MCF-7 cells,
in contrast to C16-IKPEAP, which has a lower IC50 against
the cancer cell line compared to HDFa fibroblasts.The formation
of birefringent nematic structures in dilute aqueous solution is a
notable feature of PAEPKI-C16 self-assembly. These lyotropic
liquid crystal structures may be of future use, for example, in the
measurement of residual dipolar couplings, which facilitates assignments
in solution NMR of biomacromolecules, as recently demonstrated,[55] for example, for the nematic phase of an amyloid
peptide in methanol.[56] A water-based system
such as PAEPKI-C16 may be highly beneficial for this and
applications such as tissue engineering or responsive sensing.
Authors: Valeria Castelletto; Ian W Hamley; Jani Seitsonen; Janne Ruokolainen; Gemma Harris; Kathrin Bellmann-Sickert; Annette G Beck-Sickinger Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: David A Christian; Shenshen Cai; Olga B Garbuzenko; Takamasa Harada; Allison L Zajac; Tamara Minko; Dennis E Discher Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Barbara B Gerbelli; Pedro L O Filho; Bruna Cortez; Pedro T Sodré; Mauricio D Coutinho-Neto; Ian W Hamley; Jani Seitsonen; Wendel A Alves Journal: Nanoscale Adv Date: 2022-07-28