Literature DB >> 32134243

Self-Assembly, Nematic Phase Formation, and Organocatalytic Behavior of a Proline-Functionalized Lipopeptide.

Juliane N B D Pelin1,2, Charlotte J C Edwards-Gayle1, Valeria Castelletto1, Andrea M Aguilar3, Wendel A Alves2, Jani Seitsonen4, Janne Ruokolainen4, Ian W Hamley1.   

Abstract

The self-assembly of the amphiphilic lipopeptide PAEPKI-C16 (P = proline, A = alanine, E = glutamic acid, K = lysine, I = isoleucine, and C16 = hexadecyl) was investigated using a combination of microscopy, spectroscopy, and scattering methods and compared to that of C16-IKPEAP with the same (reversed) peptide sequence and the alkyl chain positioned at the N-terminus and lacking a free N-terminal proline residue. The catalytic activity of these peptides was then compared using a model aldol reaction system. For PAEPKI-C16, the cryo-TEM images showed the formation of micrometer-length fibers, which by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were found to have radii of 2.5-2.6 nm. Spectroscopic analysis shows that these fibers are built from β-sheets. This behavior is in complete contrast to that of C16-IKPEAP, which forms spherical micelles with peptides in a disordered conformation [Hutchinson J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 613]. In PAEPKI-C16, spontaneous alignment of fibers was observed upon increasing pH, which was accompanied by observed birefringence and anisotropy of SAXS patterns. This shows the ability to form a nematic phase, and unprecedented nematic hydrogel formation was also observed for these lipopeptides at sufficiently high concentrations. SAXS shows retention of an ultrafine (1.7 nm core radius) fibrillar network within the hydrogel. PAEPKI-C16 with free N-terminal proline shows enhanced anti:syn diastereoselectivity and better conversion compared to C16-IKPEAP. The cytotoxicity of PAEPKI-C16 was also lower than that of C16-IKPEAP for both fibroblast and cancer cell lines. These results highlight the sensitivity of lipopeptide properties to the presence of a free proline residue. The spontaneous nematic phase formation by PAEPKI-C16 points to the high anisotropy of its ultrafine fibrillar structure, and the formation of such a phase at low concentrations in aqueous solution may be valuable for future applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocatalysis; fibers; hydrogel; lipopeptides; nematic; self-assembly

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32134243      PMCID: PMC7146753          DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c00686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


Introduction

Organocatalysts incorporating l-proline residues have been employed in asymmetric catalysis for a wide range of synthetic reactions.[1] Proline-based organocatalysts containing long hydrophobic chains have been found to catalyze aldol reactions in reaction mixtures containing both water and organic solvents.[2] A lipidated peptide with a C16 (hexadecyl, palmitoyl) chain attached at the C-terminus and a proline-based head group (PRW-C16) was found to have high catalytic activity for aldol reactions performed in water, with very good stereoselectivity and conversion rates.[3] The lipidated peptide self-assembles in the form of spherical micelles above a critical aggregation concentration (cac), and the self-assembled structures are responsible for catalytic properties, since poor results were obtained in the absence of lipidated assembles. In another example, Escuder et al. studied aldol reactions catalyzed by l-proline-derived peptides that form organogels[4] or hydrogels.[5] Aldol reactions combine two carbonyl compounds to form a new C–C bond, to produce a compound containing a β-hydroxy carbonyl group,[6,7] which is found in living organisms and has exceptional pharmacological activities. Since the 1970s, it has been known that l-proline is a very efficient organocatalyst for aldol reactions.[8] Many aldol reactions involving l-proline are performed in organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and chloroform, which are harmful and environmentally unfavorable.[3] As a result, there is a current drive to overcome this by replacing these solvents with green solvents such as water. The use of water is also attractive for promoting self-assembly via hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding. Lipidation of peptides commonly leads to self-assembly in aqueous solution into a variety of nanostructures including micelles, nanotapes, and nanofibrils.[9−12] Lipopeptides are a type of peptide amphiphile (PA). Recently, our group studied the effect of the substitution of an ester with an amide linkage between the hydrophobic lipid chain and the hydrated peptide head group in the PRW-C16 lipopeptide.[13] The linker group may influence the biocatalytic activity because of differences in the local conformation around the catalytic site and/or the polarization of the amide or ester linkages. Aldol reactions using cyclohexanone and p-nitrobenzaldehyde showed that PRW-NH-C16 has a high enantiomeric excess (88–89%) and diastereoselectivity (93:7 anti:syn) compared to PRW-O-C16 (71–84%, 91:9). Both lipopeptides self-assemble into spherical micelles. However, the spherical micelles formed by PRW-NH-C16 are slightly larger than those of PRW-O-C16, and this along with the configuration of the tripeptide micellar corona leads to a higher conversion. Peptide hormones are attracting interest as targets for novel therapeutics and diagnostics. Some of us have recently been investigating the self-assembly of derivatives of the human gut hormone PYY3-36, which is one of the pancreatic peptides and is a therapeutic target for obesity since it is a signal of satiety following food intake.[14−17] The self-assembly of lipidated and PEGylated analogues, which were designed to have enhanced stability and circulation time, was investigated. Lipidated PYY3-36 peptides can form spherical micelles or fibrils depending on the nature of the lipid chain and the solution pH.[18,19] The PEGylated PYY3-36 variants studied formed irregular aggregates.[19] Fragment peptides may retain significant activity of the parent full-sequence peptide but with improved ease of synthesis and cost-effectiveness. We therefore examined lipopeptides containing PYY3-36 fragments. We recently studied the self-assembly of C16-IKPEAP and C16-IKPEAPGE, which contain N-terminal hexameric and octameric sequences from PYY3-36.[20] Both these lipopeptides form spherical micelles that are stable over a wide pH range, above defined critical aggregation concentrations. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy showed that the lipidated peptides have disordered structures, in contrast to the polyproline II (PPII) conformation of the peptides themselves. Notably, upon drying these samples, β-sheet fibrillar (“amyloid-like”) fibrils are observed.[20] Here, we study a related variant of PYY3-36, with a palmitoyl chain (hexadecyl, C16) attached to the peptide head group at the C-terminus. The peptide sequence is PAEPKI (Scheme ), which is the reverse of IKPEAP, the C-terminal hexapeptide from PYY3-36.
Scheme 1

Molecular Structures of (Top) PAEPKI-C16 and (Bottom) C16-IKPEAP

As shown in Scheme , PAEPKI-C16 differs from C16-IKPEAP for two reasons: first, the P residue is free at the N terminus (unlike C-terminal P-COOH in C16-IKPEAP), and second, the palmitoyl chain is attached C terminally via CONH rather than via the NHCO-C15H31 N-terminal linkage in C16-IKPEAP. PAEPKI-C16 was synthesized to have a free terminal P residue in order to study its activity as a proline-based organocatalyst of a model aldol reaction. Results from this investigation are presented herein. In addition, we examine the self-assembly of the lipopeptide by first determining the cac using fluorescence probe assays. The conformation of the peptide is then studied using CD spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction, and the self-assembled structure is determined using small-angle X-ray scattering. The results are compared to those previously reported for C16-IKPEAP.[20] We unexpectedly found that at a sufficiently high concentration, PAEPKI-C16 spontaneously forms a nematic phase in water, and this lyotropic liquid crystal phase is a rarely reported structure for lipopeptides;[21−24] to the best of our knowledge, nematic hydrogels have not been previously reported. We then investigate the organocatalytic activity of PAEPKI-C16 using a model aldol reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde and cyclohexanone, and the results are compared to those for C16-IKPEAP previously reported elsewhere.[13] In addition, the cytotoxicity and anticancer activity of PAEPKI-C16 are examined and compared to the corresponding measurements for C16-IKPEAP. PYY3-36 is an agonist for the Y2 receptor, which is a G-protein-coupled receptor. Y2 receptors are known to play a role in tumor development and are recognized as tumor markers overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells.[25] Therefore, PYY3-36 derivatives may have potential in cancer therapeutics. In addition, proline metabolism plays a key role in cancer, with an important connection to genes regulating the p53 tumor suppressor protein,[26] and as such, this pathway has emerged as a potential cancer therapy target.[27] Conjugation of a free proline to a short lipidated peptide as in PAEPKI-C16 may provide a substrate with anticancer activity, which is investigated herein in an initial study using breast cancer cells. Its cytotoxicity is compared to that against fibroblasts.

Materials and Methods

Materials

PAEPKI-C16 (TFA salt) was synthesized by Peptide Synthetics, U.K. The molecular weight determined by mass spectrometry was 877.20 g mol–1 (expected: 877.2 g mol–1), and the purity by HPLC was >95.0%. C16-IKPEAP (ammonium acetate salt) was synthesized by Peptide Synthetics, U.K. The molecular weight determined by mass spectrometry was 892.18 g mol–1 (expected: 891.60 g mol–1), and the purity by HPLC was >95.0%.

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fluorescence spectra were recorded as described previously.[28] ANS assays were performed using 3.25 × 10–4 to 0.13 wt % peptide in 2.1 × 10–3 wt % 8-anilino-1-napthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) solution. Pyrene assays were performed using 3.25 × 10–4 to 0.13 wt % peptide in 2.167 × 10–5 wt % pyrene solution.

Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR spectra were recorded as described previously.[28] Samples containing 1 and 2 wt % lipopeptides in D2O at pH native, 8, and 12 were measured using CaF2 plate windows with a 6 μm spacer. The spectra were scanned 118 times over the range of 4000 to 500 cm–1 and at a resolution of 4 cm–1. An averaged D2O spectrum was used as the background, and its signal was subtracted from the experimental data.

Circular Dichroism (CD)

CD spectra were recorded as described previously.[29] Quartz plaques (0.1 and 0.01 mm thick) were used for the experiments at native pH, pH 8 and pH 12. Ellipticity is reported as the mean residue ellipticity ([θ], in degrees cm2 dmol–1) and calculated as [θ] = [θ]obs MRW/10cl, where [θ]obs is the ellipticity measured in millidegrees, MRW is the mean residue molecular weight of the peptide (molecular weight divided by the number of amino acid residues), c is the concentration of the sample in mg/mL, and l is the optical path length of the cell in centimeters.

Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM)

Cryo-TEM images were obtained as described previously.[28]

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)

SAXS experiments were performed on the bioSAXS beamline B21 at Diamond Light Source, U.K., as described previously.[28]

Aldol Reactions in Water

Cyclohexanone (0.9 mmol, 85 μL) was added to the peptide catalysts (3.3 μmol, 3.0 mg), varying the amount of water (170 μL, 85 μL, and in the absence). p-Nitrobenzaldehyde (67.9 μmol, 10.3 mg) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 days before being extracted with ethyl acetate four times. For the experiment containing no water, 0.5 mL of water was added to the system before extraction, to help in the phase separation. NMR measurements using a (1H) Bruker Ultrashield 300 were performed at 300 MHz with a deuterated chloroform solvent. The yield and diastereomer anti:syn ratio were calculated using the NMR spectrum obtained, where tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as a reference. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.22–8.18 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.51–7.47 (m, 2H, ArH); 5.47 (br s, 1H, CHOH-syn); 4.89 (dd, J = 7.5 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 1H, CHOH-anti); 4.08 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, CHOH-anti); 2.66–2.30 (m, 1H, CHCHOH); 2.66–2.30 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)); 2.16–1.24 (m, 6H, chex-H).

Cytocompatibility Studies

In vitro cell culture was carried out using HCT-116 (ECAAC human colorectal tumor cell line) and HDFa (human dermal fibroblast cells). HCT-116 was cultured in McCoys 5A modified medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (ThermoScientific, 100×). HDFa cells were cultured in DMEM F12 media supplemented with 5% FBS, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and 100 μg/mL insulin. The cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The effect of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16 on cell viability was assessed using an MTT (3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The cells were seeded into a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h, to allow the cells to adhere at a seeding density of either 1 × 104 or 4 × 104 cells/mL for HCT-116 and HDFa, respectively. After this, a total volume of 100 μL of the peptide dissolved in complete medium was added, to yield final peptide concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 4 × 10–4 wt %. Negative controls containing 100 μL of complete medium were also included. After 67 h of incubation, 20 μL of MTT (0.5 wt % in PBS) was added to each well plate and allowed to incubate for 5 h (total of 72 h incubation). After this, the solutions were removed from the wells and replaced with 100 μL of DMSO and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was read using a microplate reader (λ = 570 nm). The absorbance readings were compared against the negative control to obtain %viability. Data are fitted with a sigmoidal line as a guide to the eye. Statistical tests, ANOVA, and Bonferroni correction, were used to assess significance.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The 3 wt % pH 8 hydrogel was immersed in a fixative solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 60 min at 5 °C. This was followed by gradual dehydration from 10 to 100% ethanol (10, 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% ethanol), with 30 s time intervals between each step. The sample was then extracted from the 100% ethanol solution and subjected to critical point drying. The dried material was placed on a stub covered with a carbon tab (Agar Scientific, U.K.), and then coated with gold. An FEI Quanta FEG 600 environmental scanning electron microscope (SEM) in high vacuum mode (20 kV high tension) was used to study and record SEM images.

Electrospinning

Electrospinning was performed using a syringe connected to a 25 kV voltage power supply (Glassman Inc.) and a syringe pump (Kd Scientific Model 200 Series). An aliquot of 1 mL of the 5 wt % hydrogel was used for electrospinning at a distance between the needle and collector of 10 cm in a 1 mL/h flow. One TEM grid was attached to the aluminum plate, and after drying at room temperature, TEM images were obtained as described above.

Results and Discussion

The critical aggregation concentration (cac) for the peptide PAEPKI-C16 at three different pH values (native, 8, and 12) was determined using a 2.2 × 10–5 wt % pyrene solution as the fluorescent probe. Considering the emission band located approximately at 393 nm and comparing these results as a function of the logarithm of the peptide concentration, it is possible to determine the cac by break points in the concentration dependent intensities (Figure a). The fluorescence spectra can be seen in Figure S1. A similar cac was observed for the samples at native pH and pH 8, being (3.3 ± 0.2) × 10–3 wt % and (3.2 ± 0.2) × 10–3 wt %, respectively, suggesting that self-assembly occurs similarly for both systems. In basic conditions (pH 12), a slight enhancement of the cac to (4.0 ± 0.2) × 10–3 wt % was observed, suggesting that hydrophobicity decreases as the pH is increased. For comparison, C16-IKPEAP has a similar cac (2.9 ± 0.2) × 10–3 wt % at native pH.[20]
Figure 1

(a) Comparison of the concentration dependence of PAEPKI-C16 and the pyrene fluorescence I (393 nm). The inflection point of the curve intersection corresponds to the cac of each sample. (b) FTIR data of 2 wt % D2O solutions of the peptide, considering different concentrations and pH.

(a) Comparison of the concentration dependence of PAEPKI-C16 and the pyrene fluorescence I (393 nm). The inflection point of the curve intersection corresponds to the cac of each sample. (b) FTIR data of 2 wt % D2O solutions of the peptide, considering different concentrations and pH. In order to study the secondary structure under distinct environmental conditions, including peptide concentration, pH, and temperature variation, FTIR and CD experiments were performed. The results are shown, respectively, in Figures b and 2. The FTIR spectra in the amide I′ and II′ regions are presented in Figure b. For all samples, the characteristic bands are located at 1628–1636 cm–1 (peaks 1 and 2) and at 1553–1554 cm–1 (peaks 3 and 4). The former are assigned to β-sheet structure.[30−32] Considering the first set of peaks, the sample at native pH contains a peak at 1636 cm–1 (peak 1), whereas the other samples show peak 2 located at 1628 cm–1. This effect suggests a higher β-sheet content for the pH 8 and pH 12 samples. The broad underlying peak shape, however, indicates an inhomogeneous ensemble with possible contributions from other structures such as poly(proline II).[33]
Figure 2

CD spectra for 0.04 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions at the pH conditions shown.

CD spectra for 0.04 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions at the pH conditions shown. Peaks 3 and 4 are in the range of the amide II band in H2O; however, this is shifted to wavenumbers below 1500 cm–1 in D2O.[34] Therefore, these peaks are assigned mainly to the side-chain asymmetric stretch vibrations of the COO– groups in the E residues, which give a peak at 1567 cm–1 in D2O.[31,32] A fraction of residual H2O in the solutions may also lead to a component of amide II features. Figure shows the CD spectra of 0.04 wt % solutions at 20 °C, which show a minimum at 207, 213, and 216 nm, respectively, for native, pH 8, and pH 12, consistent with β-sheet structures.[35−37] The spectra do not contain the typical maximum observed just below 200 nm for typical β-sheet structures and in fact somewhat resemble the spectra observed for poly(l-proline) at high temperatures.[38] However, the presence of β-sheet structures is independently confirmed both by the FTIR spectra and the formation of fibril structures, as will be discussed shortly. Upon increasing the concentration of the peptide to 0.5 wt % at 20 °C, the location of the minima in the spectra shifted to 232, 229, and 226 nm (Figure S2). The red shift of the peak position may be due to increased twisting of the β-sheets, along with potential light scattering from the suspensions of highly extended fibers (vide infra).[39] Upon heating these systems from 20 to 80 °C, differences in the negative band intensity were seen (Figure S2). At native conditions, the increase of the temperature promoted a gradual enhancement of the minimum. The opposite effect occurred at pH 8, which showed a decrease in the minimum intensity with the increasing temperature. A very large minimum was observed for the sample at pH 12 at low temperatures, which is due to the formation of highly extended fibrils, as will be discussed shortly. Cryo-TEM was used to image self-assembled structures, and the images can be seen in Figure . These show the formation of fibrils, with a population of oligomers at native pH. With the increase of pH, more fibers are observed. The fibrils extend to micrometers in length (Figure S3), especially at high pH. In addition, an increase in fiber thickness can be observed at high pH along with an increase in the alignment of the fibrils.
Figure 3

Cryo-TEM images of 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 at (a) native, (b) pH 8, and (c) pH 12.

Cryo-TEM images of 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 at (a) native, (b) pH 8, and (c) pH 12. To further investigate the self-assembled fibril structure, SAXS was performed. The SAXS intensity profiles were fitted using the long cylinder shell form factor and Gaussian size distribution from the SASfit[40] package, producing fits shown as red lines in Figure a. Table S1 summarizes the fitted parameters. The length of the cylinders (L) was fixed at 1000 nm (with L ≫ R, this parameter only represents a scaling parameter), and the scattering length density of the solvent (ηsolv) was fixed. The cylinder radius (R) was 2.15 ± 0.2 nm, independent of pH. However, an increase of the shell thickness (ΔR) from 0.3 to 0.5 nm is observed with increasing pH (this corresponds to only the outer residues of the peptide, some of which are part of the “core”). In the low q vector region, the SAXS curves show differences for horizontal and vertical scattering, especially at high pH, as can be seen in Figure S4. This anisotropy in the low q SAXS patterns is due to the formation of spontaneously aligned nematic liquid crystal structures, as will be discussed shortly.
Figure 4

(a) SAXS data (gray symbols) and fitted form factors using a long cylindrical shell model (red lines) for 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions, varying the pH. (b) Images of the birefringence of the samples in vials placed between crossed polarizers.

(a) SAXS data (gray symbols) and fitted form factors using a long cylindrical shell model (red lines) for 1 wt % PAEPKI-C16 water solutions, varying the pH. (b) Images of the birefringence of the samples in vials placed between crossed polarizers. Another important effect monitored was the electron density distribution in the self-assembled structures. Considering the scattering length density of the core (ηcore) and shell (ηshell), it was observed (Table S1) that the higher the pH, the higher is the core density and the lower is the shell density, pointing to the formation of more compact structures at high pH. Since cryo-TEM shows the presence of aligned fibers and SAXS in 1 wt % aqueous solutions also indicates significant sample anisotropy, the macroscopic sample birefringence was examined for samples placed in glass flasks between crossed polarizers. An increase of the birefringence is observed with increasing pH, as shown in Figure b. In this case, the native system was the only system that did not present anisotropy. We reasoned that since PAEPKI-C16 self-assembles into highly extended fibrils, it might be possible to form hydrogels at a sufficiently high concentration due to the formation of (noncovalently) cross-linked fibrillar networks. Upon increasing the peptide concentration to 5 wt %, only the pH 8 sample (Figure ) spontaneously formed a soft hydrogel at room temperature. The other samples (native and pH 12) were subjected to a heating–cooling process, and after this, the pH 12 sample formed a hydrogel, while the native remained in solution, as can be seen in Figure . The tube inversion test shows the existence of (finite yield stress) hydrogels.
Figure 5

Images of 5 wt % PAEPKI-C16 solutions at native, pH 8, and pH 12.

Images of 5 wt % PAEPKI-C16 solutions at native, pH 8, and pH 12. The fibrillar structure of the hydrogels was confirmed through a combination of SEM, SAXS, and TEM, as shown in Figure . The SEM image in Figure a shows a fibrillar network structure. SAXS data from gels showed form factor features (Figure b), which could be fitted with the same cylindrical shell form factor model as for solutions, with a similar fibril core radius and shell thicknesses (Table S2). This shows that the hydrogels are formed from a network of ultrafine peptide fibrils, with a radius of approximately 2 nm. As for solutions, the PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels also showed birefringence, which was higher at pH 12, as can be seen in Figure c, which shows gels suspended in liquid. We also attempted to generate electrospun macroscopic fibers from concentrated solutions of the lipopeptide, and although this was not possible, we were able to image fibrils in the electrospun droplets using TEM (Figure d).
Figure 6

(a) SEM image showing fiber structures in a pH 8 hydrogel. (b) SAXS data (gray) and fitted form factor (red) using a cylindrical shell model for 3 wt % PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels, at two pH values indicated. (c) Images of the birefringence between crossed polarizers of the 3 wt % samples. (d) Scheme of the electrospinning procedure and TEM images of the electrospun 5 wt % gel samples.

(a) SEM image showing fiber structures in a pH 8 hydrogel. (b) SAXS data (gray) and fitted form factor (red) using a cylindrical shell model for 3 wt % PAEPKI-C16 hydrogels, at two pH values indicated. (c) Images of the birefringence between crossed polarizers of the 3 wt % samples. (d) Scheme of the electrospinning procedure and TEM images of the electrospun 5 wt % gel samples. The importance of the availability of the proline residue in peptide sequences for aldol reactions has been highlighted.[3] Also, in comparison with the recently studied C16-IKPEAP lipopeptide, we monitored the efficiency of PAEPKI-C16 as a catalyst in asymmetric aldol reactions using p-nitrobenzaldehyde, cyclohexanone, and water, presented in Scheme .
Scheme 2

Aldol Reaction Mechanism Using p-Nitrobenzaldehyde and Cyclohexanone as Reagents, Catalyzed by PAEPKI-C16 at Native pH

Table summarizes the conversion and stereoselectivity of the aldol products, with comparison of both peptides. The NMR results for entries 1, 2, and 3 can be seen in Figure S5. For these reactions, 5 mol % catalyst solutions were used, with an excess of cyclohexanone (12 equiv), following the same experimental methodology for C16-IKPEAP.[20] The assignment of the stereoisomers obtained was based on the literature.[42]
Table 1

Conversion and Diastereoselectivity of the Direct Aldol Reaction of p-Nitrobenzaldehyde and Cyclohexanone for PAEPKI-C16 Compared to the Peptide Derivative C16-IKPEAP[20]

entryapeptidecatalyst (mol %)H2Ob (equiv)conversionc (%)anti:sync
1PAEPKI-C1652.07.978:22
2 51.08.781:19
3 50.05684:16
4C16-IKPEAP52.03.615:85
5 51.01051:49
6 50.03436:64

The reactions were performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring for 72 h.

Water excess in relation to cyclohexanone (v/v).

Yield and diastereoselectivity were obtained by 1H NMR analysis of the gross product.

The reactions were performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring for 72 h. Water excess in relation to cyclohexanone (v/v). Yield and diastereoselectivity were obtained by 1H NMR analysis of the gross product. The influence of water on the catalyzed aldol reaction was evaluated, and entries 1–3 and 6 were stabilized in solution, while entries 4 and 5 form hydrogels during the reaction process. The best conditions presented for both peptides are described in entries 3 and 6, which presented high conversion (56 and 34% for PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP, respectively) and good diastereoselectivity (84:16 and 36:64). Based on this result, it was possible to conclude that the absence of water in the reaction medium favored the formation of the anti-aldol product, which can be related to the access of the reagents to the proline residues in the organic phase. PAEPKI-C16 shows enhanced diastereoselectivity compared to C16-IKPEAP under all conditions examined and conversion under conditions except 1 equiv of H2O, when it was slightly lower than for C16-IKPEAP. These results show that the molecular structure of the peptide influences the conversion and diastereoselectivity of the reactions. Depending on the mode of self-assembly, the enamine transition state formed can favor the attack of the ketone and aldehyde at the catalytic surface, i.e., the proline-functionalized surface of the self-assembled structures. Cytocompatibility studies of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16 were performed using an MTT assay on human breast cancer (MCF-7) and human dermal fibroblast (HDFa) cells to determine cell viability (Figure ) and to examine whether there was any selectivity toward cancer cells. HDFa was used as a control cell line in order to observe whether there is a preferential effect against the cancer cell line. The results are summarized in Table .
Figure 7

MTT assay of the viability of fibroblasts (HDFa) and breast cancer MCF-7 cells as a function of concentration of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16.

Table 2

Cytocompatibility Results (IC50 Values) for C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16

 C16-IKPEAPPAEPKI-C16
cell linewt %μMwt %μM
HDFa0.0340.390.00840.10
MCF-70.0550.630.02000.23
MTT assay of the viability of fibroblasts (HDFa) and breast cancer MCF-7 cells as a function of concentration of C16-IKPEAP and PAEPKI-C16. A difference is noted in the IC50 values for C16-IKPEAP against MCF-7 and HDFa cells, corresponding to 0.021 wt % or 0.24 μM. However, PAEPKI-C16 exhibited a stronger activity against HDFa than MCF-7. Generally, PAEPKI-C16 is more toxic than C16-IKPEAP, which is presumably due to the different modes of self-assembly. The peptide residues in PAEPKI-C16 are present at a high density on the surface of highly elongated fibers, whereas those in C16-IKPEAP are present on the surface of micelles. The difference in the catalytic behavior and cytotoxicity is influenced by the very different self-assembly properties of PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP. The enhanced catalytic activity is likely due to the high density of the free prolines present at the surface of the fibrils of PAEPKI-C16. The higher cytotoxicity of this lipopeptide is also likely due to the formation of extended nanostructures. It is known for polymeric and inorganic nanoparticles, for example, that the shape of the nanostructure significantly influences cytotoxicity.[43−46] Among other effects, this can arise due to the different modes of internalization of anisotropic particles. In a series of papers, the Stupp group has highlighted that the presence of peptide motifs on the surface of fibrils formed by lipopeptides enhances bioactivity.[47−49] The highly distinct modes of self-assembly of the two lipopeptides studied here lead to significant differences in biocatalytic activity and cytotoxicity. At the molecular level, this must be due to the configuration of the peptide forming the surface corona of the nanostructures and the linker group. The electrostatic repulsion of the C-terminal P-COOH units in C16-IKPEAP is likely to favor the formation of micelles, whereas this interaction is suppressed in PAEPKI-C16, and stacking of the hydrophobic terminal P and A residues promotes β-sheet formation. This may also be favored by the salt bridging interactions between the E and K residues in PAEPKI-C16, which are not hindered by the presence of the additional C-terminal charge in C16-IKPEAP. It should be noted that the increase in the fibril alignment and nematic phase birefringence observed upon increasing pH is ascribed to the likely predominant effect of pH on the charge of the lysine residue, the side chain of which has a pKa of 10.5, although this can be modified by the presence of other residues (for example, the nearby glutamic acid residue).[50,51] Proline also has a reported pKa of the amine group near pKa 11.[51] At high pH, the lysine and proline residues will be deprotonated, leading to a loss of the positive charges in the peptide, which may lead to increased electrostatic interactions between the anionic glutamic acid residues on peptides within the fibril, possibly causing an increased fibril persistence length.

Conclusions

Our study shows many significant differences in the self-assembly behavior and properties when comparing lipopeptide homologues with reversed sequence and lipid chain attachment. The results of PAEPKI-C16 presented here show that it forms highly elongated β-sheet fibril structures, especially at pH 8–12, in complete contrast to C16-IKPEAP, which has previously been shown to form spherical micelles.[20] The critical aggregation concentrations for the two lipopeptides are similar; however, the aggregated structure is very distinct. The formation of a nematic phase is only possible with extended structures such as fibrils; therefore, it is not surprising that this is not observed for C16-IKPEAP, which forms micellar aggregates. The ability of PAEPKI-C16 to form hydrogels (at sufficiently high pH) is also notable (and may be contrasted with C16-IKPEAP). To the best of our knowledge, nematic hydrogels have not been previously reported for self-assembling lipopeptides, although they are known for amyloid-forming peptides.[52−54] It is evident that the gelation correlates with the formation of highly extended fibrils, the presence of which within the hydrogels is confirmed by in situ SAXS. The fibril network is based on ultrafine fibers with a core radius of only 2 nm. The catalytic activity of the two lipopeptides is also quite different, as demonstrated by our model aldol reaction analysis. PAEPKI-C16 shows a significant enhancement in diastereoselectivity compared to C16-IKPEAP under the same reaction conditions. The conversion is also significantly higher for PAEPKI-C16 under most conditions (with one exception, Table ). This is ascribed to the presence of a free proline residue in PAEPKI-C16 in contrast to C16-IKPEAP with C-terminal amide-linked proline. Remarkable significant differences in the cytotoxicity of PAEPKI-C16 and C16-IKPEAP were observed, the former being substantially more cytotoxic (lower IC50) against both fibroblast and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. This peptide shows preferential activity against fibroblasts rather than MCF-7 cells, in contrast to C16-IKPEAP, which has a lower IC50 against the cancer cell line compared to HDFa fibroblasts. The formation of birefringent nematic structures in dilute aqueous solution is a notable feature of PAEPKI-C16 self-assembly. These lyotropic liquid crystal structures may be of future use, for example, in the measurement of residual dipolar couplings, which facilitates assignments in solution NMR of biomacromolecules, as recently demonstrated,[55] for example, for the nematic phase of an amyloid peptide in methanol.[56] A water-based system such as PAEPKI-C16 may be highly beneficial for this and applications such as tissue engineering or responsive sensing.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Recent efforts directed to the development of more sustainable asymmetric organocatalysis.

Authors:  José G Hernández; Eusebio Juaristi
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Organocatalytic direct asymmetric aldol reactions in water.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Mase; Yusuke Nakai; Naoko Ohara; Hidemi Yoda; Kunihiko Takabe; Fujie Tanaka; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Circular and linear dichroism of proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bulheller; Alison Rodger; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Switchable performance of an L-proline-derived basic catalyst controlled by supramolecular gelation.

Authors:  Francisco Rodríguez-Llansola; Beatriu Escuder; Juan F Miravet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Conformation and Aggregation of Selectively PEGylated and Lipidated Gastric Peptide Hormone Human PYY3-36.

Authors:  Valeria Castelletto; Ian W Hamley; Jani Seitsonen; Janne Ruokolainen; Gemma Harris; Kathrin Bellmann-Sickert; Annette G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Supramolecular Hydrogel Formation in a Series of Self-Assembling Lipopeptides with Varying Lipid Chain Length.

Authors:  V Castelletto; A Kaur; R M Kowalczyk; I W Hamley; M Reza; J Ruokolainen
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.988

7.  Kinetics of the self-aggregation and film formation of poly-L-proline at high temperatures explored by circular dichroism spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lonna Tooke; Laura Duitch; Thomas J Measey; Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Flexible filaments for in vivo imaging and delivery: persistent circulation of filomicelles opens the dosage window for sustained tumor shrinkage.

Authors:  David A Christian; Shenshen Cai; Olga B Garbuzenko; Takamasa Harada; Allison L Zajac; Tamara Minko; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Supramolecular Assembly of Peptide Amphiphiles.

Authors:  Mark P Hendricks; Kohei Sato; Liam C Palmer; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 10.  The hormonal control of food intake.

Authors:  Anthony P Coll; I Sadaf Farooqi; Stephen O'Rahilly
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biocatalysts Based on Peptide and Peptide Conjugate Nanostructures.

Authors:  Ian W Hamley
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Interaction between glyphosate pesticide and amphiphilic peptides for colorimetric analysis.

Authors:  Barbara B Gerbelli; Pedro L O Filho; Bruna Cortez; Pedro T Sodré; Mauricio D Coutinho-Neto; Ian W Hamley; Jani Seitsonen; Wendel A Alves
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.