| Literature DB >> 32132911 |
Antoine Falisse1, Lorenzo Pitto1, Hans Kainz1, Hoa Hoang1, Mariska Wesseling1, Sam Van Rossom1, Eirini Papageorgiou2, Lynn Bar-On2,3, Ann Hallemans4, Kaat Desloovere2, Guy Molenaers5,6, Anja Van Campenhout5,6, Friedl De Groote1, Ilse Jonkers1.
Abstract
Physics-based simulations of walking have the theoretical potential to support clinical decision-making by predicting the functional outcome of treatments in terms of walking performance. Yet before using such simulations in clinical practice, their ability to identify the main treatment targets in specific patients needs to be demonstrated. In this study, we generated predictive simulations of walking with a medical imaging based neuro-musculoskeletal model of a child with cerebral palsy presenting crouch gait. We explored the influence of altered muscle-tendon properties, reduced neuromuscular control complexity, and spasticity on gait dysfunction in terms of joint kinematics, kinetics, muscle activity, and metabolic cost of transport. We modeled altered muscle-tendon properties by personalizing Hill-type muscle-tendon parameters based on data collected during functional movements, simpler neuromuscular control by reducing the number of independent muscle synergies, and spasticity through delayed muscle activity feedback from muscle force and force rate. Our simulations revealed that, in the presence of aberrant musculoskeletal geometries, altered muscle-tendon properties rather than reduced neuromuscular control complexity and spasticity were the primary cause of the crouch gait pattern observed for this child, which is in agreement with the clinical examination. These results suggest that muscle-tendon properties should be the primary target of interventions aiming to restore an upright gait pattern for this child. This suggestion is in line with the gait analysis following muscle-tendon property and bone deformity corrections. Future work should extend this single case analysis to more patients in order to validate the ability of our physics-based simulations to capture the gait patterns of individual patients pre- and post-treatment. Such validation would open the door for identifying targeted treatment strategies with the aim of designing optimized interventions for neuro-musculoskeletal disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Hill-type muscle-tendon model; computational biomechanics; human locomotion; magnetic resonance imaging; muscle-tendon unit; optimal control; spasticity; synergy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32132911 PMCID: PMC7040166 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1Overview of (A) clinical questions and corresponding simulations, and (B) methodology. MRI images are used to generate a musculoskeletal model of the child with personalized geometries. This MRI-based model as well as experimental data collected during walking and instrumented passive spasticity assessments (IPSA) are inputs to optimization procedures providing personalized estimates of Hill-type muscle-tendon parameters characterizing altered muscle-tendon properties and personalized feedback gains characterizing spasticity. The framework for predictive simulations generates gait patterns by optimizing a cost function, describing a walking-related performance criterion, subject to the muscle and skeleton dynamics of the MRI-based musculoskeletal model. We investigated the effects of impairments on predicted gait patterns (dotted arrows): in Qi we evaluated the effect of altered vs. unaltered muscle-tendon properties by using personalized vs. generic muscle-tendon parameters in the muscle dynamics; in Qii we assessed the influence of reducing the neuromuscular control complexity by imposing a reduced number of muscle synergies; in Qiii we explored the impact of spasticity on walking performance. Details on how we modeled these impairments are described in the methods. As an additional analysis, Qiv, we evaluated how well the model was able to reproduce the gait pattern of a typically developing (TD) child by adding a term in the cost function penalizing deviations between predicted gait pattern and measured gait data of a TD child. All these analyses can be combined as well as performed in isolation. Details are provided in section “model-based analyses”.
Clinical examination.
| Hip flexion | 145° | 140° | Hip flexion MAS | ||
| Hip extension | Hip adduction (Knee 0°) MAS | ||||
| Hip abduction (Knee 0°) | 25° | 25° | Hip adduction (Knee 90°) MAS | 0 | 0 |
| Hip abduction (Knee 90°) | 45° | 45° | Hamstrings MAS | ||
| Hip adduction | 0° | 0° | Hamstrings Tardieu | / | |
| Hip internal rotation (prone) | 60° | 70° | Duncan-Ely MAS | ||
| Hip external rotation (prone) | 25° | 25° | Soleus MAS | 0 | 0 |
| Hip internal rotation (supine) | 25° | 30° | Soleus Tardieu | / | / |
| Hip external rotation (supine) | 55° | 50° | Gastrocnemius MAS | ||
| Knee flexion | 120° | 120° | Gastrocnemius Tardieu | 0° | |
| Knee extension | Tibialis posterior MAS | 0 | 0 | ||
| Knee spontaneous position | Clonus | 0 | 0 | ||
| Popliteal angle Unilateral | |||||
| Popliteal angle Bilateral | |||||
| Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 90°) | 20° | 25° | |||
| Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 0°) | 15° | 15° | |||
| Ankle plantarflexion | 35° | 35° | Femoral anteversion | 35° | 35° |
| Ankle inversion | 40° | 45° | Tibia-femoral angle | 25° | 25° |
| Ankle eversion | 10° | 10° | Bimalleor angle | 40° | 40° |
| Hip flexion | 2 | 2 | Hip flexion | 4 | 4 |
| Hip extension | 1.5 | 1.5 | Hip extension | ||
| Hip abduction | 1.5 | 1.5 | Hip abduction | ||
| Hip adduction | 2 | 2 | Hip adduction | 4 | 4 |
| Knee flexion | 1.5 | 1.5 | Knee flexion | 4 | |
| Knee extension | 1.5 | Knee extension | |||
| Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 90°) | 1.5 | 1.5 | Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 90°) | 4 | 4 |
| Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 0°) | 1.5 | 1.5 | Ankle dorsiflexion (Knee 0°) | 4 | 4 |
| Ankle plantarflexion | 1.5 | 1.5 | Ankle plantarflexion | 4 | |
| Ankle inversion | 1.5 | 1.5 | Ankle inversion | 4 | 4 |
| Ankle eversion | 2 | 1.5 | Ankle eversion | 4 | 4 |
ROM is range of motion. Spasticity, MAS is for Modified Ashworth Scale: 1 is low, 1+ is medium, and 2 is high spastic involvement. Selectivity: 1 is medium, 1.5 is good, and 2 is perfect selective control. Strength: 3 is medium and 4 is good strength; strength from 3 indicates ability to move against gravity. Clinically meaningful deviations from unimpaired individuals are in bold.
Figure 2Influence of the muscle-tendon parameters on the predicted walking gaits. Variables from the right leg are shown over a complete gait cycle; left leg variables are shown in Figure S1. Vertical lines indicate the transition from stance to swing. Experimental data is shown as mean ± two standard deviations. Experimental EMG data was normalized to peak activations. GRF is for ground reaction forces; BW is for body weight; COT is for metabolic cost of transport; lh is for long head. Gait snapshots cover a gait cycle starting at right heel strike; left leg segments are more transparent.
Figure 3Influence of the synergies on walking gaits predicted with the generic muscle-tendon parameters. Variables from the right leg are shown over a complete gait cycle; left leg variables are shown in Figure S2. Vertical lines (solid) indicate the transition from stance to swing. Panels of synergy weights are divided into sections (A-I) to relate bars to muscle names provided in the bottom bar plot, which is an expanded version of the plot of weights with title 4 synergies: 3. Lh and sh are for long and short head, respectively. Weights were normalized to one. Experimental data is shown as mean ± two standard deviations. Gait snapshots cover a gait cycle starting at right heel strike; left leg segments are more transparent.
Figure 4Influence of the synergies on walking gaits predicted with the personalized muscle-tendon parameters. Variables from the right leg are shown over a complete gait cycle; left leg variables are shown in Figure S3. Vertical lines (solid) indicate the transition from stance to swing. Panels of synergy weights are divided into sections (A-I) to relate bars to muscle names provided in the bottom bar plot, which is an expanded version of the plot of weights with title 4 synergies: 3. Lh and sh are for long and short head, respectively. Weights were normalized to one. Experimental data is shown as mean ± two standard deviations. Experimental EMG data was normalized to peak activations. Gait snapshots cover a gait cycle starting at right heel strike; left leg segments are more transparent.
Figure 5Influence of spasticity on the predicted muscle activity. Activations from right leg muscles only are shown over a complete gait cycle; left leg activations are shown in Figure S4. When accounting for spasticity, total activations (green) combine spastic (solid black) and non-spastic (dotted black) activations. Vertical lines indicate the transition from stance to swing. Experimental data is shown as mean ± two standard deviations. Experimental EMG data was normalized to peak activations. Lh is for long head. Gait snapshots cover a gait cycle starting at right heel strike; left leg segments are more transparent; the snapshots are for the case with no synergies.
Figure 6Influence of tracking the TD kinematics on predicted walking gaits. Variables from the right leg are shown over a complete gait cycle; left leg variables are shown in Figure S5. Vertical lines indicate the transition from stance to swing. Experimental data is shown as mean ± two standard deviations. Muscle fatigue is modeled by activations at the tenth power. Passive muscle forces are normalized by maximal isometric muscle forces. Sh is for short head. Gait snapshots cover a gait cycle starting at right heel strike; left leg segments are more transparent. The influence of synergies on predicted walking gaits is depicted in Figure S6.