Literature DB >> 33362693

Clinical Relevance of State-of-the-Art Analysis of Surface Electromyography in Cerebral Palsy.

Germana Cappellini1,2, Francesca Sylos-Labini1, Carla Assenza2, Laura Libernini2, Daniela Morelli2, Francesco Lacquaniti1,3, Yury Ivanenko1.   

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) can be used to assess the integrity of the neuromuscular system and its impairment in neurological disorders. Here we will consider several issues related to the current clinical applications, difficulties and limited usage of sEMG for the assessment and rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. The uniqueness of this methodology is that it can determine hyperactivity or inactivity of selected muscles, which cannot be assessed by other methods. In addition, it can assist for intervention or muscle/tendon surgery acts, and it can evaluate integrated functioning of the nervous system based on multi-muscle sEMG recordings and assess motor pool activation. The latter aspect is especially important for understanding impairments of the mechanisms of neural controllers rather than malfunction of individual muscles. Although sEMG study is an important tool in both clinical research and neurorehabilitation, the results of a survey on the clinical relevance of sEMG in a typical department of pediatric rehabilitation highlighted its limited clinical usage. We believe that this is due to limited knowledge of the sEMG and its neuromuscular underpinnings by many physiotherapists, as a result of lack of emphasis on this important methodology in the courses taught in physical therapy schools. The lack of reference databases or benchmarking software for sEMG analysis may also contribute to the limited clinical usage. Despite the existence of educational and technical barriers to a widespread use of, sEMG does provide important tools for planning and assessment of rehabilitation treatments for children with cerebral palsy.
Copyright © 2020 Cappellini, Sylos-Labini, Assenza, Libernini, Morelli, Lacquaniti and Ivanenko.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abnormal development; cerebral palsy; clinical application; muscle pathophysiology; rehabilitation; spinal locomotor output; surface electromyography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33362693      PMCID: PMC7759523          DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.583296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurol        ISSN: 1664-2295            Impact factor:   4.003


  146 in total

Review 1.  Gross muscle morphology and structure in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rod S Barrett; Glen A Lichtwark
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 2.  Intervention and the role of theory, empiricism and experience in children with motor impairment.

Authors:  David Sugden; Carolyn Dunford
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Sensory feedback to ankle plantar flexors is not exaggerated during gait in spastic hemiplegic children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Maria Willerslev-Olsen; Jacob Buus Andersen; Thomas Sinkjaer; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Quantification of cocontraction in spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  A J Ikeda; M F Abel; K P Granata; D L Damiano
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12

5.  Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles during walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Valentina La Scaleia; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Impaired muscle growth precedes development of increased stiffness of the triceps surae musculotendinous unit in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Maria Willerslev-Olsen; Mai Choe Lund; Jakob Lorentzen; Lee Barber; Mathilde Kofoed-Hansen; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 7.  Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Irene Moll; Johannes S H Vles; Dan L H M Soudant; Adhiambo M A Witlox; Heleen M Staal; Lucianne A W M Speth; Yvonne J M Janssen-Potten; Marcel Coenen; Suzanne M Koudijs; R Jeroen Vermeulen
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.449

8.  Electromyographic (EMG) analysis of quadriceps muscle fatigue in children with cerebral palsy during a sustained isometric contraction.

Authors:  Angeline Nsenga Leunkeu; Daniel J Keefer; Miladi Imed; Said Ahmaidi
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Prospective longitudinal study of gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Jeanine M Voorman; Annet J Dallmeijer; Dirk L Knol; Gustaaf J Lankhorst; Jules G Becher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Dimensionality of joint torques and muscle patterns for reaching.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Mattia D'Andola; Alessandro Portone; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  3 in total

1.  Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Using Surface Electromyography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Munoz-Novoa; Morten B Kristoffersen; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Autumn Naber; Margit Alt Murphy; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Does the Score on the MRC Strength Scale Reflect Instrumented Measures of Maximal Torque and Muscle Activity in Post-Stroke Survivors?

Authors:  Pawel Kiper; Daniele Rimini; Deborah Falla; Alfonc Baba; Sebastian Rutkowski; Lorenza Maistrello; Andrea Turolla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Evaluation of Multilevel Surgeries in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy Based on Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Sujiao Li; Xueqin Luo; Song Zhang; Yuanmin Tang; Jiming Sun; Qingyun Meng; Hongliu Yu; Chengyan Sun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.