Literature DB >> 32132340

Decreased Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass is Associated with Poor Outcomes after ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Ryosuke Sato1, Eiichi Akiyama1, Masaaki Konishi1, Yasushi Matsuzawa1, Hiroyuki Suzuki1, Chika Kawashima1, Yuichiro Kimura1, Kozo Okada1, Nobuhiko Maejima1, Noriaki Iwahashi1, Kiyoshi Hibi1, Masami Kosuge1, Toshiaki Ebina1, Stephan von Haehling2, Stefan D Anker2, Kouichi Tamura3, Kazuo Kimura1.   

Abstract

AIM: The importance of sarcopenia in cardiovascular diseases has been recently demonstrated. This study aims to examine whether skeletal muscle mass (SMM), an important component of sarcopenia, is associated with an increased risk of poor outcome in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: We measured SMM in 387 patients with STEMI using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Patients were divided into low- and high-appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI: appendicular SMM divided by height squared (kg/m2)) groups using the first quartile of ASMI (≤ 6.64 kg/m2 for men and ≤ 5.06 kg/m2 for women). All patients were followed up for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and unplanned revascularization.
RESULTS: Low-ASMI group was older and had a more complex coronary lesion, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and a higher prevalence of Killip classification ≥ 2 than high-ASMI group. During a median follow-up of 33 months, the event rate was significantly higher in low-ASMI group than in high-ASMI group (24.7% vs 13.4%, log-rank p=0.001). Even after adjustment for patients' background, low ASMI was independently associated with the high risk of primary composite events (adjusted hazard ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.01- 4.19, p=0.04). In the subgroup analyses of male patients (n=315), the optimal cutoff point of ASMI for predicting primary composite outcome was 6.75 kg/m2, which was close to its first quartile value.
CONCLUSIONS: Low ASMI is independently associated with poor outcome in patients with STEMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; Sarcopenia; Skeletal muscle mass

Year:  2020        PMID: 32132340      PMCID: PMC7840163          DOI: 10.5551/jat.52282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb        ISSN: 1340-3478            Impact factor:   4.928


  33 in total

1.  Different types of resistance training in type 2 diabetes mellitus: effects on glycaemic control, muscle mass and strength.

Authors:  Andreas Egger; David Niederseer; Gernot Diem; Thomas Finkenzeller; E Ledl-Kurkowski; Rosemarie Forstner; Christian Pirich; Wolfgang Patsch; Raimund Weitgasser; Josef Niebauer
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.

Authors:  Darryl P Leong; Koon K Teo; Sumathy Rangarajan; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Alvaro Avezum; Andres Orlandini; Pamela Seron; Suad H Ahmed; Annika Rosengren; Roya Kelishadi; Omar Rahman; Sumathi Swaminathan; Romaina Iqbal; Rajeev Gupta; Scott A Lear; Aytekin Oguz; Khalid Yusoff; Katarzyna Zatonska; Jephat Chifamba; Ehimario Igumbor; Viswanathan Mohan; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Hongqiu Gu; Wei Li; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Measures of overweight and obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population-based study.

Authors:  Thomas S G Sehested; Tine W Hansen; Michael H Olsen; Steen Z Abildstrøm; Susanne Rasmussen; Hans Ibsen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Sten Madsbad; Jørgen Jeppesen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-08

4.  Effect of inflammation on handgrip strength in the non-critically ill is independent from age, gender and body composition.

Authors:  K Norman; N Stobäus; K Kulka; J Schulzke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Handgrip strength as a predictor of prognosis in Japanese patients with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Kazuhiro P Izawa; Satoshi Watanabe; Naohiko Osada; Yusuke Kasahara; Hitoshi Yokoyama; Koji Hiraki; Yuji Morio; Satoru Yoshioka; Koichiro Oka; Kazuto Omiya
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2009-02

6.  Association between gait speed as a measure of frailty and risk of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yasushi Matsuzawa; Masaaki Konishi; Eiichi Akiyama; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Naoki Nakayama; Masayoshi Kiyokuni; Shinichi Sumita; Toshiaki Ebina; Masami Kosuge; Kiyoshi Hibi; Kengo Tsukahara; Noriaki Iwahashi; Mitsuaki Endo; Nobuhiko Maejima; Kenichiro Saka; Katsutaka Hashiba; Kozo Okada; Masataka Taguri; Satoshi Morita; Seigo Sugiyama; Hisao Ogawa; Hironobu Sashika; Satoshi Umemura; Kazuo Kimura
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Obesity and cardiovascular diseases: implications regarding fitness, fatness, and severity in the obesity paradox.

Authors:  Carl J Lavie; Paul A McAuley; Timothy S Church; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard.

Authors:  Fanny Buckinx; Francesco Landi; Matteo Cesari; Roger A Fielding; Marjolein Visser; Klaus Engelke; Stefania Maggi; Elaine Dennison; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Sophie Allepaerts; Jurgen Bauer; Ivan Bautmans; Maria Luisa Brandi; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Francesca Cerreta; Antonio Cherubini; Cyrus Cooper; Alphonso Cruz-Jentoft; Eugene McCloskey; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andrea Laslop; Jean Petermans; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Sian Robinson; Yves Rolland; Ricardo Rueda; Bruno Vellas; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  Muscular responses to testosterone replacement vary by administration route: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jared W Skinner; Dana M Otzel; Andrew Bowser; Daniel Nargi; Sanjay Agarwal; Mark D Peterson; Baiming Zou; Stephen E Borst; Joshua F Yarrow
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  Effects of 24-Week Aerobic and Resistance Training on Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Flow Velocity in Elderly Women with Sarcopenic Obesity.

Authors:  Jinkee Park; Yoochan Kwon; Hyuntea Park
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.928

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Sarcopenia and Frailty in Heart Failure: Is There a Biomarker Signature?

Authors:  Ryosuke Sato; Mirela Vatic; Guilherme Wesley Peixoto da Fonseca; Stephan von Haehling
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-10-20

2.  Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Poor Prognosis in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Underling Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Kazunori Shimada
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.928

3.  SARC-F Is a Predictor of Longer LOS and Hospital Readmission in Hospitalized Patients after a Cardiovascular Event.

Authors:  Ana Paula Trussardi Fayh; Francisco Felipe de Oliveira Guedes; Guilherme Carlos Filgueira Calado; Sandra Azevedo Queiroz; Marina Gabriely Gomes Barbosa Anselmo; Iasmin Matias de Sousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 4.  Relationship Between Sarcopenia and Cardiovascular Diseases in the Elderly: An Overview.

Authors:  Nana He; Yuelin Zhang; Lu Zhang; Shun Zhang; Honghua Ye
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-09

5.  Sarcopenia-derived exosomal micro-RNA 16-5p disturbs cardio-repair via a pro-apoptotic mechanism in myocardial infarction in mice.

Authors:  Taiki Hayasaka; Naofumi Takehara; Tatsuya Aonuma; Kohei Kano; Kiwamu Horiuchi; Naoki Nakagawa; Hiroki Tanaka; Jun-Ichi Kawabe; Naoyuki Hasebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.