BACKGROUND:Resistance training has become a mainstay of exercise training in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, it remains controversial whether hypertrophy resistance training (HRT) is superior to endurance resistance training (ERT) with regard to its effects on glycaemic control, muscle mass and strength. METHODS:Thirty-two patients with T2DM (13 men and 19 women; 64.8 ± 7.8 years) were randomly assigned to either eight weeks of HRT (n = 16; 2 sets, 10-12 repetitions, 70% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM)) or ERT (n = 16; 2 sets, 25-30 repetitions, 40% 1-RM). In addition, all patients participated in aerobic exercise training (AET; 1 hour/day on 2 non-consecutive days/week; cycle ergometer; 70% of heart rate reserve). RESULTS: After eight weeks of intervention, there were time but not group effects for reduced glucose and fructosamine levels, weight, BMI, waist circumference, subcutaneous abdominal fat, resting heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; muscle mass of the arms and physical exercise capacity increased significantly. Significant time and group effects were documented for maximum strength of the chest, with a greater increase for HRT than ERT (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Specific maximal resistance training of the chest muscles led to superior gain in strength as compared to endurance resistance training. This, however, did not translate into superior values of glycaemic control, weight, waist circumference, muscle mass and physical work capacity, which all improved significantly by a similar magnitude in both groups. Since overall effects of both protocols were comparable, both may be offered to patients according to their personal preference.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Resistance training has become a mainstay of exercise training in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, it remains controversial whether hypertrophy resistance training (HRT) is superior to endurance resistance training (ERT) with regard to its effects on glycaemic control, muscle mass and strength. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with T2DM (13 men and 19 women; 64.8 ± 7.8 years) were randomly assigned to either eight weeks of HRT (n = 16; 2 sets, 10-12 repetitions, 70% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM)) or ERT (n = 16; 2 sets, 25-30 repetitions, 40% 1-RM). In addition, all patients participated in aerobic exercise training (AET; 1 hour/day on 2 non-consecutive days/week; cycle ergometer; 70% of heart rate reserve). RESULTS: After eight weeks of intervention, there were time but not group effects for reduced glucose and fructosamine levels, weight, BMI, waist circumference, subcutaneous abdominal fat, resting heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; muscle mass of the arms and physical exercise capacity increased significantly. Significant time and group effects were documented for maximum strength of the chest, with a greater increase for HRT than ERT (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Specific maximal resistance training of the chest muscles led to superior gain in strength as compared to endurance resistance training. This, however, did not translate into superior values of glycaemic control, weight, waist circumference, muscle mass and physical work capacity, which all improved significantly by a similar magnitude in both groups. Since overall effects of both protocols were comparable, both may be offered to patients according to their personal preference.
Entities:
Keywords:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus; glycaemic control; physical work capacity; resistance training; upper body strength
Authors: Swaytha V Yalamanchi; Kerry J Stewart; Nan Ji; Sherita H Golden; Adrian Dobs; Diane M Becker; Dhananjay Vaidya; Brian G Kral; Rita R Kalyani Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Dominique Hansen; Josef Niebauer; Veronique Cornelissen; Olga Barna; Daniel Neunhäuserer; Christoph Stettler; Cajsa Tonoli; Eugenio Greco; Robert Fagard; Karin Coninx; Luc Vanhees; Massimo F Piepoli; Roberto Pedretti; Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz; Ugo Corrà; Jean-Paul Schmid; Constantinos H Davos; Frank Edelmann; Ana Abreu; Bernhard Rauch; Marco Ambrosetti; Simona Sarzi Braga; Paul Beckers; Maurizio Bussotti; Pompilio Faggiano; Esteban Garcia-Porrero; Evangelia Kouidi; Michel Lamotte; Rona Reibis; Martijn A Spruit; Tim Takken; Carlo Vigorito; Heinz Völler; Patrick Doherty; Paul Dendale Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Lance E Davidson; David E Kelley; Stanley Heshka; John Thornton; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Lawrence Boxt; Ashok Balasubramanyam; Dympna Gallagher Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-06-19
Authors: Igor Grabovac; Sandra Haider; Eva Winzer; Ali Kapan; Karin E Schindler; Christian Lackinger; Thomas E Dorner Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Daniela Bassi; Renata Gonçalves Mendes; Vivian Maria Arakelian; Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso; Ramona Cabiddu; José Carlos Bonjorno Júnior; Ross Arena; Audrey Borghi-Silva Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2016-08-11
Authors: Richard Kirwan; Deaglan McCullough; Tom Butler; Fatima Perez de Heredia; Ian G Davies; Claire Stewart Journal: Geroscience Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 7.713