| Literature DB >> 32131774 |
Tianpu Gu1,2,3, Lu Zhao1,2,3, Zhuzhu Liu1,2,3, Shaozhen Zhao1,2,3, Hong Nian4,5,6, Ruihua Wei7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the differences in terms of tear film and meibomian glands (MGs) between young Asian soft contact lens (CL) wearers and non-wearers.Entities:
Keywords: Contact lens; Meibomian gland dysfunction; Meibomian glands; Tear film young Asian
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32131774 PMCID: PMC7057503 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-1328-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Comparison of the age, sex ratio, OSDI, TMH, NITBUT, and CFS scores for participants from both groups
| Age (years) | Sex Ratio (M/F) | OSDI (scale 0–100) | TMH (mm) | NIBUT (s) | CFS scores (scale 0–12) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL group | 25.52 ± 3.20 | 23/62 | 17.21 ± 8.67 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 6.95 ± 4.79 | 2.02 ± 1.48 |
| Control group | 23.35 ± 3.83 | 18/45 | 11.41 ± 6.00 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 9.26 ± 2.95 | 1.06 ± 0.88 |
| 0.065 | 0.622 | < 0.001 | 0.040 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
CL contact lens, OSDI the ocular surface disease index, TMH tear meniscus height, NIBUT noninvasive tear breakup time, CFS corneal fluorescein staining, M/F male/female
Fig. 1Method to quantity Meibomian gland changes. a Meibomian gland dropout. Yellow line in the left panel marks the total area (T), and yellow line in the right panel marks out the area with Meibomian gland dropout (D). The dropout ratio is quantified as the ratio between size of D and T. b. Meibomian gland distortion. Yellow line represents Meibomian gland with distortion. The angle between the line segments is greater than 45 degrees
Comparison of the MG dropout and distorted MG count for participants from both groups
| MG dropout (%) | Distorted MG count | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Upper eyelid | Lower eyelid | Total | Upper eyelid | Lower eyelid | |
| CL group | 28.94 ± 12.66 | 30.88 ± 13.34 | 23.26 ± 17.44 | 4.86 ± 3.44 | 3.72 ± 3.09 | 1.14 ± 0.97 |
| Control group | 18.7 ± 8.78 | 18.42 ± 8.7 | 16.79 ± 11.74 | 2.75 ± 1.83 | 2.03 ± 1.69 | 0.71 ± 0.63 |
| < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.017 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.006 | |
CL contact lens, MGs meibomian glands
Linear regression analyses of the associations of the total MG dropout with age, gender, OSDI, TMH, NIBUT, CFS scores, the number of distort MGs, and the duration of CL use
| Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beta (95% CI) | beta (95% CI) | |||
| Age (years) | 0.016 (0.008 to 0.024) | < 0.001 | – | – |
| Gender (male) | −0.037 (−0.099 to 0.024) | 0.229 | – | – |
| OSDI | 0.004 (0.001 to 0.007) | 0.006 | 0.003 (0 to 0.005) | 0.043 |
| TMH (mm) | 0.187 (−0.276 to 0.065) | 0.424 | – | – |
| NIBUT (s) | −0.003 (− 0.009 to 0.003) | 0.311 | – | – |
| CFS scores | 0.038 (0.021 to 0.055) | < 0.001 | 0.031 (0.016 to 0.047) | < 0.001 |
| Number of distort MGs | 0.003 (−0.005 to 0.011) | 0.477 | – | – |
| Duration of CL use (years) | 0.014 (0.008 to 0.020) | < 0.001 | 0.010 (0.004 to 0.016) | 0.001 |
CL contact lens, OSDI the ocular surface disease index, TMH tear meniscus height, NIBUT noninvasive tear breakup time, CFS corneal fluorescein staining, MGs meibomian glands
Fig. 2Scatterplot of the total MG dropout by duration of CL use (β = 0.014, P < 0.001, a), OSDI (β = 0.004, P = 0.006, b), and CFS scores (β = 0.038, P < 0.001, c) with the best fit line in soft CL wearers
Fig. 3Comparison of the MG Dropout and Distort MG count for Participants from Both Groups (the CL group were divided into the three small groups by the duration of CL wear: 1–2 years, 3–5 years, and over 5 years)