| Literature DB >> 32129844 |
Simon Ducharme1,2, Annemiek Dols3, Robert Laforce4, Emma Devenney5, Fiona Kumfor5, Jan van den Stock6, Caroline Dallaire-Théroux7, Harro Seelaar8, Flora Gossink3, Everard Vijverberg9, Edward Huey10, Mathieu Vandenbulcke11, Mario Masellis12, Calvin Trieu3, Chiadi Onyike13, Paulo Caramelli14, Leonardo Cruz de Souza14, Alexander Santillo15, Maria Landqvist Waldö16, Ramon Landin-Romero5, Olivier Piguet16, Wendy Kelso17, Dhamidhu Eratne17, Dennis Velakoulis17, Manabu Ikeda18, David Perry19, Peter Pressman20, Bradley Boeve21, Rik Vandenberghe22, Mario Mendez23, Carole Azuar24, Richard Levy24, Isabelle Le Ber24, Sandra Baez25, Alan Lerner26, Ratnavalli Ellajosyula27, Florence Pasquier28, Daniela Galimberti29,30, Elio Scarpini29,30, John van Swieten8, Michael Hornberger31, Howard Rosen32, John Hodges5, Janine Diehl-Schmid33, Yolande Pijnenburg9.
Abstract
The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a frequent cause of early-onset dementia. The diagnosis of bvFTD remains challenging because of the limited accuracy of neuroimaging in the early disease stages and the absence of molecular biomarkers, and therefore relies predominantly on clinical assessment. BvFTD shows significant symptomatic overlap with non-degenerative primary psychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders and even personality disorders. To date, ∼50% of patients with bvFTD receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis, and average diagnostic delay is up to 5-6 years from symptom onset. It is also not uncommon for patients with primary psychiatric disorders to be wrongly diagnosed with bvFTD. The Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia was recently established to determine the current best clinical practice and set up an international collaboration to share a common dataset for future research. The goal of the present paper was to review the existing literature on the diagnosis of bvFTD and its differential diagnosis with primary psychiatric disorders to provide consensus recommendations on the clinical assessment. A systematic literature search with a narrative review was performed to determine all bvFTD-related diagnostic evidence for the following topics: bvFTD history taking, psychiatric assessment, clinical scales, physical and neurological examination, bedside cognitive tests, neuropsychological assessment, social cognition, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging, CSF and genetic testing. For each topic, responsible team members proposed a set of minimal requirements, optimal clinical recommendations, and tools requiring further research or those that should be developed. Recommendations were listed if they reached a ≥ 85% expert consensus based on an online survey among all consortium participants. New recommendations include performing at least one formal social cognition test in the standard neuropsychological battery for bvFTD. We emphasize the importance of 3D-T1 brain MRI with a standardized review protocol including validated visual atrophy rating scales, and to consider volumetric analyses if available. We clarify the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the exclusion of bvFTD when normal, whereas non-specific regional metabolism abnormalities should not be over-interpreted in the case of a psychiatric differential diagnosis. We highlight the potential role of serum or CSF neurofilament light chain to differentiate bvFTD from primary psychiatric disorders. Finally, based on the increasing literature and clinical experience, the consortium determined that screening for C9orf72 mutation should be performed in all possible/probable bvFTD cases or suspected cases with strong psychiatric features.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; differential diagnosis; frontotemporal dementia; guidelines; psychiatry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32129844 PMCID: PMC7849953 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501