| Literature DB >> 32125546 |
Atsushi Ikeda1, Takahiro Kojima1, Koji Kawai1, Shiro Hinotsu2, Naoto Keino3, Kenichiro Shiga4, Hideaki Miyake5, Yasuyoshi Miyata6, Yutaka Enomoto7, Fumitaka Shimizu8, Satoshi Anai9, Hideyasu Matsuyama10, Chieko Suzuki11, Yusuke Kanimoto12, Keisuke Shigeta13, Seiji Naito4, Hideyuki Akaza14, Hiroyuki Nishiyama15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A previous comparative study in Japan has demonstrated that the two consecutive UroVysion tests are useful tools to detect the presence of bladder cancer during follow-up after transurethral resection, but they also presented their high rates of false-positive results. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the UroVysion tests and subsequent intravesical recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: Intravesical recurrence; Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; UroVysion
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32125546 PMCID: PMC7261273 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01634-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Oncol ISSN: 1341-9625 Impact factor: 3.402
Fig. 1Flow diagram of patient enrollment. MIBCmuscle-invasive bladder cancer,TURBTtransurethral resection, BC bladder cancer
Patient characteristics
| % | Negative results in both tests ( | Positive result in one of the tests ( | Positive results in both tests ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | ||||||
| Male | 281 | 86.2 | 184 | 86.0 | 80 | 87.9 | 17 | 81.0 |
| Female | 45 | 13.8 | 30 | 14.0 | 11 | 12.1 | 4 | 19.0 |
| Age, years | ||||||||
| Median (range) | 71 (26–91) | 70 (26–90) | 72 (40–91) | 69 (40–85) | ||||
| History of bladder cancer | ||||||||
| Primary | 226 | 69.3 | 151 | 70.6 | 61 | 67.8 | 14 | 66.7 |
| Recurrent | 100 | 30.7 | 63 | 29.4 | 30 | 32.2 | 7 | 33.3 |
| No. of lesions | ||||||||
| Single | 151 | 46.3 | 97 | 45.3 | 44 | 48.3 | 10 | 47.6 |
| Multiple | 136 | 41.7 | 90 | 42.1 | 41 | 45.1 | 5 | 23.8 |
| Cannot be evaluated | 39 | 12.0 | 27 | 12.6 | 6 | 6.6 | 6 | 28.6 |
| Gradea | ||||||||
| Low grade | 138 | 41.9 | 97 | 45.3 | 30 | 33.0 | 11 | 52.4 |
| High grade | 141 | 44.0 | 90 | 42.1 | 44 | 48.3 | 7 | 33.3 |
| Cannot be evaluated | 47 | 14.1 | 27 | 12.6 | 17 | 18.7 | 3 | 14.3 |
| TNM stage | ||||||||
| Ta | 192 | 58.9 | 129 | 60.3 | 48 | 52.7 | 15 | 71.4 |
| T1 | 104 | 31.9 | 68 | 31.8 | 33 | 36.3 | 3 | 14.3 |
| Tis | 23 | 7.1 | 14 | 6.5 | 6 | 6.6 | 3 | 14.3 |
| Cannot be evaluated | 7 | 2.1 | 3 | 1.4 | 4 | 4.4 | 0 | 0 |
| Presence of CIS | ||||||||
| No | 255 | 78.2 | 168 | 78.5 | 70 | 76.9 | 17 | 81.0 |
| Yes | 71 | 21.8 | 46 | 21.5 | 21 | 23.1 | 4 | 19.0 |
| Smoking | ||||||||
| Current | 60 | 18.4 | 39 | 18.2 | 17 | 18.7 | 4 | 19.1 |
| Former | 112 | 34.4 | 71 | 33.2 | 31 | 34.0 | 10 | 47.6 |
| Never | 91 | 27.9 | 62 | 29.0 | 24 | 26.4 | 5 | 23.8 |
| Unknown | 63 | 29.3 | 42 | 19.6 | 19 | 20.9 | 2 | 9.5 |
There was no significant difference in the distribution of clinical characteristics
CIS carcinoma in situ, TNM tumor-node-metastasis
a1973 World Health Organization classification
Recurrence rate and pathological diagnosis of recurrent tumor according to the UroVysion test pattern
| Total | Negative results in both tests | Positive result in one of the tests | Positive results in both tests | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 326 | 214 | 91 | 21 |
| No. of recurrences (%) | 40 (12.3) | 18 (8.4) | 15 (16.5) | 7 (33.3) |
| TNM stage, Grade (%) | ||||
| Ta low | 20 (50) | 9 (50) | 8 (53.3) | 3 (42.9) |
| Ta high/T1/Tis | 15 (37.5) | 8 (44.4) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (42.9) |
| T2 or greater | 3 (7.5) | 1 (5.6) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (14.2) |
| Cannot be evaluated | 2 (5) | 0 | 2 (1.3) | 0 |
Fig. 2Recurrence-free survival rate stratified by the pattern of the results of the two consecutive UroVysion tests
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses for recurrence after the UroVysion test in the second analysis
| Variable ( | Number of patients | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age, years | |||||
| < 70 | 160 | 1 (reference) | 0.5422 | ||
| 71 < | 166 | 0.824(0.437–1.53) | |||
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 45 | 1 (reference) | 0.166 | ||
| Male | 281 | 2.10 (0.758–8.71) | |||
| History of bladder cancer | |||||
| Primary | 226 | 1 (reference) | 0.00250 | 1 (reference) | 0.0069 |
| Recurrent | 100 | 2.63 (1.41–4.94) | 2.39 (1.27–4.51) | ||
| No. of lesions | |||||
| Single | 151 | 1 (reference) | 0.0650 | ||
| Multiple | 136 | 1.87 (0.926–3.94) | |||
| T stage | |||||
| Ta | 192 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| T1 | 104 | 0.502 (0.200–1.11) | 0.0899 | 0.566 (0.224–1.26) | 0.1708 |
| Tis | 23 | 2.57 (1.02–5.70) | 0.0459 | 2.16 (0.848–4.82) | 0.1012 |
| Grade | |||||
| Low | 138 | 1 (reference) | 0.214 | ||
| High | 141 | 0.809 (0.389–1.67) | |||
| Presence of CIS | |||||
| No | 255 | 1 (reference) | 0.346 | ||
| Yes | 71 | 1.41 (0.674–2.74) | |||
| Postoperative intravesical therapy | |||||
| No | 97 | 1 (reference) | 0.866 | ||
| BCG | 116 | 0.831 (0.376–1.85) | |||
| Chemotherapy | 113 | 0.990 (0.463–2.16) | |||
| Smoking | |||||
| Never | 91 | 1 (reference) | 0.640 | ||
| Former | 112 | 1.34 (0.608–3.08) | |||
| Current | 60 | 1.39 (0.554–3.46) | |||
| Combination of two consecutive analyses of UroVysion tests | |||||
| Negative results in both tests | 214 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| Positive result in one of the tests | 91 | 2.02 (1.00–4.02) | 0.0488 | 2.06 (1.01–4.13) | 0.0467 |
| Positive results in both tests | 21 | 4.71 (1.83–10.8) | 0.0024 | 4.15 (1.59–9.65) | 0.0051 |
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant