Literature DB >> 17210520

Reflex UroVysion testing of bladder cancer surveillance patients with equivocal or negative urine cytology: a prospective study with focus on the natural history of anticipatory positive findings.

Brian J Yoder1, Marek Skacel, Ryan Hedgepeth, Denise Babineau, James C Ulchaker, Louis S Liou, Jennifer A Brainard, Charles V Biscotti, J Stephen Jones, Raymond R Tubbs.   

Abstract

A proportion of patients under surveillance for recurrent bladder carcinoma with no immediate evidence of bladder tumor recurrence have positive multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; UroVysion, Vysis, Downers Grove, IL) results. The course of these "anticipatory positive" cases and the time to bladder tumor recurrence remains unknown. We followed up 250 patients with urine cytologic results, concurrent multitarget FISH, and cystoscopic examination for recurrent urothelial carcinoma. Of 81 cases (32.4%) with FISH-positive results, tumor recurrence developed in 60 (74.0%). Of 169 (67.6%) FISH-negative cases, recurrent urothelial carcinoma developed in 22 (13.0%). Of 211 patients (84.4%) with negative cystoscopic examination results, 56 (26.5%) had positive FISH results, and in 35 (62.5%) of these patients, recurrent urothelial carcinoma developed. Approximately 27% of patients under bladder carcinoma surveillance without immediate evidence of tumor recurrence will have a positive FISH result, defining the anticipatory positive subset. In about 65% of this anticipatory positive group, recurrent bladder urothelial carcinoma developed within 29 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17210520     DOI: 10.1309/ADJL7E810U1H42BJ

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  41 in total

1.  Possible malignancy after cytology analysis in a 45-year-old man.

Authors:  Mark Soloway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for suspicious urinary cytology in patients with bladder cancer with negative surveillance cystoscopy.

Authors:  Philip H Kim; Ranjit Sukhu; Billy H Cordon; John P Sfakianos; Daniel D Sjoberg; A Ari Hakimi; Guido Dalbagni; Oscar Lin; Harry W Herr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Comparison of different concepts for interpretation of chromosomal aberrations in urothelial cells detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Johannes Mischinger; Lutz Philipp Guttenberg; Jörg Hennenlotter; Georgios Gakis; Stefan Aufderklamm; Steffen Rausch; Eva Neumann; Jens Bedke; Stefan Kruck; Christian Schwentner; Arnulf Stenzl; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Evaluation of urovysion and cytology for bladder cancer detection: a study of 1835 paired urine samples with clinical and histologic correlation.

Authors:  Haythem Dimashkieh; Daynna J Wolff; T Michael Smith; Patricia M Houser; Paul J Nietert; Jack Yang
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Biomarkers for precision medicine in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Kojima; Koji Kawai; Jun Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prospective evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosing urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tianhai Lin; Zhenhua Liu; Liangren Liu; Lu Yang; Ping Han; Peng Zhang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization and its ability to predict bladder cancer recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kipp; Mihaela Tanasescu; Terry A Else; Sandra C Bryant; R Jeffrey Karnes; Thomas J Sebo; Kevin C Halling
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Gene amplification of EGFR and its clinical significance in various cervical (lesions) lesions using cytology and FISH.

Authors:  Qing Li; Xue Cheng; Jie Ji; Jingmin Zhang; Xiaojun Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 10.  Bladder tumor markers: from hematuria to molecular diagnostics--where do we stand?

Authors:  Samir P Shirodkar; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.