| Literature DB >> 32124467 |
Maaike G J M van Bergen1, Joline L Saes2,3, Annet Simons4, Konnie M Hebeda5, Yvonne M C Henskens1,6, Wideke Barteling1, Erik Huys1, Britta A P Laros-van Gorkom2,3, Saskia E M Schols2,3, Frank W Preijers1, Marjolijn C J Jongmans4,7,8, Joop H Jansen1, Bert A van der Reijden1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32124467 PMCID: PMC7317484 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hematol ISSN: 0361-8609 Impact factor: 10.047
Figure 1Family history, platelet phenotyping and genetic analyses in a patient with a partial deletion of CBFB. A, Family pedigree with one affected family member with a bleeding disorder as well as a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 16q22.1. Besides patient II.1 none of the other family members had a clinical presentation of a bleeding tendency. The father of the index patient (I1) was deceased and unavailable for further testing. No clinical abnormalities were reported. □ represents male, ○ represents females. B, Transmission electron microscopy images show platelets with few α‐granules (as depicted with an arrowhead) as well as platelets with normal amounts of α‐granules. (JEM 1400 Flash, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) C, D, Whole mount electron microscopy image revealed on average increased numbers of δ‐granules (5.84 granules/platelet, black dots depicted with arrowheads) in the platelets from index II.1 compared to healthy controls (3.66 granules/platelet). (JEM 1400 Flash, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) Whole mount EM was performed twice at different time points, showing similar results. E, CD34 expression was measured on CD42b positive platelets. CD34 was expressed on platelets derived from the index patient II.1 (n = 2), whereas the platelets from the son (III.1) as well as healthy controls (n = 10) showed no CD34 expression. F, The last exon of CBFB together with eight other genes were deleted as observed in WES (not shown) and SNP array. The proximal breakpoint is situated within intron 5 of CBFB. The father (I1) of index patient II.1 was unavailable for genotyping. The mother (I2) did not carry the deletion nor did the son (III.1). G, 3′‐RACE using an oligo‐dT primer was performed, followed by amplification of the cDNA from exon5 onwards and subsequently a semi‐nested PCR was performed. Sanger sequencing identified a transcript that predicts the coding for 11 amino acids prior to encountering a stop codon into CBFB intron 5. H, High expression of intron 5 sequences was observed in blood mononuclear cells from the index patient II.1, whereas low expression was observed for five healthy controls and the index case her son (III.1). Expression was measured with RT‐qPCR with primers indicated with the black boxes in panel G. Expression was normalized against the housekeeping gene Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Primer sequences are given in Table S2