Literature DB >> 32123955

High school male basketball athletes exhibit greater hamstring muscle stiffness than females as assessed with shear wave elastography.

April L McPherson1, Takashi Nagai2,3,4, Nathan D Schilaty5,6,7,8, Rena Hale2,3,4, Timothy E Hewett9, Nathaniel A Bates2,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize lower extremity passive muscle stiffness in a young, healthy, athletic population. It was hypothesized that males would exhibit greater stiffness than females and that hamstring stiffness would increase with increased passive hamstring stretch.
METHODS: Male (n = 52, age 16.0 ± 1.3 years, height 180.3 ± 7.9 cm, weight 73.1 ± 11.8 kg) and female (n = 89, age 15.6 ± 1.3 years, height 169.7 ± 8.1 cm, weight 65.2 ± 13.2 kg) high school basketball athletes were recruited for this study. Shear wave elastography (SWE) was used to measure shear wave velocity (m/s) of the biceps femoris muscle at three leg positions (40%, 60%, and 80%) of the maximum passive 90-90 straight-leg raise position for each leg. Hamstring stiffness (kPa) was quantified from the SWE elastogram using custom processing software.
RESULTS: Hamstring stiffness was significantly greater for males than females at every position on both the dominant and non-dominant limbs (p < 0.05). Hamstring stiffness was greater on the non-dominant limb than the dominant for females at the 40% position. Stiffness at 60% was greater than stiffness at 40% for males on both the dominant and non-dominant limbs. However, stiffness at 60% was greater than stiffness at 80% on the male non-dominant limb. Females demonstrated higher stiffness at 40% than both 60% and 80% for the dominant and non-dominant limbs.
CONCLUSION: Healthy male basketball players had higher hamstring muscle stiffness than female players. Future studies may investigate what factors contribute to the large variability observed in muscle stiffness, resulting in mixed results on the effects of leg dominance and stretching positions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Sex differences; Shear wave elastography; Skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32123955      PMCID: PMC7305958          DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03397-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

1.  Age-Related Differences in Muscle Shear Moduli in the Lower Extremity.

Authors:  Ryota Akagi; Yota Yamashita; Yuta Ueyasu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Sonoelastography: musculoskeletal applications.

Authors:  Andrea S Klauser; Hideaki Miyamoto; Rosa Bellmann-Weiler; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Marius C Wick; Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical predictors of time to return to competition and of recurrence following hamstring strain in elite Australian footballers.

Authors:  Price Warren; Belinda J Gabbe; Michal Schneider-Kolsky; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  The effect of unit, depth, and probe load on the reliability of muscle shear wave elastography: Variables affecting reliability of SWE.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alfuraih; Philip O'Connor; Elizabeth Hensor; Ai Lyn Tan; Paul Emery; Richard J Wakefield
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 5.  Shear wave sonoelastography of skeletal muscle: basic principles, biomechanical concepts, clinical applications, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Maud Creze; Antoine Nordez; Marc Soubeyrand; Laurence Rocher; Xavier Maître; Marie-France Bellin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Validation of shear wave elastography in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Sarah F Eby; Pengfei Song; Shigao Chen; Qingshan Chen; James F Greenleaf; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Ultrasound shear wave elastography in the assessment of passive biceps brachii muscle stiffness: influences of sex and elbow position.

Authors:  Johnson Chen; Michael O'Dell; Wen He; Li-Juan Du; Pai-Chi Li; Jing Gao
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 8.  Evaluation and management of hamstring injuries.

Authors:  Christopher S Ahmad; Lauren H Redler; Michael G Ciccotti; Nicola Maffulli; Umile Giuseppe Longo; James Bradley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Sex differences in active tibialis anterior stiffness evaluated using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Robin Souron; Florian Bordat; Adrien Farabet; Alain Belli; Léonard Feasson; Antoine Nordez; Thomas Lapole
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Elastography Study of Hamstring Behaviors during Passive Stretching.

Authors:  Guillaume Le Sant; Filiz Ates; Jean-Louis Brasseur; Antoine Nordez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of hip and knee joint angles on resting hamstring muscles rigidity in men and women.

Authors:  Cyril Martin; Alexandre Fouré; Jérémie Bouvier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Gender difference in effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on flexibility and stiffness of hamstring muscle.

Authors:  Suiqing Yu; Lihua Lin; Hongying Liang; Ming Lin; Weixin Deng; Xinshu Zhan; Xihua Fu; Chunlong Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.