| Literature DB >> 32121005 |
Franco Furlani1, Pietro Parisse2, Pasquale Sacco1.
Abstract
This contribution is aimed at extending our previous findings on the formation and stability of chitosan/hyaluronan-based complex coacervates. Colloids are herewith formed by harnessing electrostatic interactions between the two polyelectrolytes. The presence of tiny amounts of the multivalent anion tripolyphosphate (TPP) in the protocol synthesis serves as an adjuvant "point-like" cross-linker for chitosan. Hydrochloride chitosans at different viscosity average molar mass, , in the range 10,000-400,000 g/mol, and fraction of acetylated units, FA, (0.16, 0.46 and 0.63) were selected to fabricate a large library of formulations. Concepts such as coacervate size, surface charge and homogeneity in relation to chitosan variables are herein disclosed. The stability of coacervates in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) was verified by means of scattering techniques, i.e., Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS). The conclusions from this set of experiments are the following: (i) a subtle equilibrium between chitosan FA and does exist in ensuring colloidal stability; (ii) once diluted in PBS, osmotic swelling-driven forces trigger the enlargement of the polymeric mesh with an ensuing increase of coacervate size and porosity.Entities:
Keywords: Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS); chitosan; complex coacervation; dissolution/aggregation stability; hyaluronan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32121005 PMCID: PMC7179103 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25051071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The fraction of acetylated units (FA), intrinsic viscosity, [], viscosity average molar mass, , molar mass of chitosan repetitive unit, , and viscosity average degree of polymerization, , of hydrochloride chitosans used for the synthesis of coacervates. is calculated using the following Mark–Houwink–Sakurada parameters, i.e., K = 8.43 × 10−3 mL/g and a = 0.92 according to Berth and Dautzenberg [28]. The FA was determined by means of 1H-NMR [29], whereas was determined by viscometry.
| FA |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | 300 | 90,000 | 201 | 448 |
| 550 | 170,000 | 846 | ||
| 950 | 310,000 | 1542 | ||
| 0.46 | 340 | 100,000 | 200 | 500 |
| 650 | 210,000 | 1050 | ||
| 920 | 300,000 | 1500 | ||
| 0.16 | 110 | 30,000 | 198 | 152 |
| 681 | 220,000 | 1111 | ||
| 1026 | 340,000 | 1717 |
Characterization of hydrochloride chitosan (CH)/sodium hyaluronate (HA) coacervates after dilution 1:10 (v/v) in deionized water. Coacervates were fabricated using chitosans at different fractions of acetylated units (FA) and viscosity average molar masses (). The hydrodynamic diameter, aggregation at time zero, polydispersity index (PDI) and surface charge, i.e., -potential, (all of them ±SD) of the resulting formulations are reported.
| FA |
| Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | PDI | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.16 | 30,000 | 180 ± 1 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 29 ± 2 | no aggregation |
| 220,000 | 200 ± 4 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 32 ± 1 | no aggregation | |
| 340,000 | 215 ± 3 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 37 ± 1 | no aggregation | |
| 0.46 | 100,000 | 254 ± 27 | 0.20 ± 0.07 | −19 ± 2 | no aggregation |
| 210,000 | 219 ± 4 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | −14 ± 1 | limited aggregation | |
| 300,000 | 253 ± 6 | 0.18 ± 0.16 | −28 ± 3 | no aggregation | |
| 0.63 | 90,000 | 227 ± 1 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | −28 ± 2 | no aggregation |
| 170,000 | 238 ± 1 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | −25 ± 3 | no aggregation | |
| 310,000 | 253 ± 3 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | −23 ± 1 | limited aggregation |
Figure 1The dependence of the coacervate hydrodynamic diameter (Z-average) and polydispersity index (PDI) on the chitosan degree of polymerization (), for formulations at different fractions of acetylated units, FA: FA = 0.16 (A), FA = 0.46 (B) and FA = 0.63 (C). Dashed lines are drawn to guide the eye.
Figure 2Dependence of coacervate surface charge (-potential) on the chitosan degree of polymerization () for formulations at different fractions of acetylated units, FA: FA = 0.16 (red dots), FA = 0.46 (black dots) and FA = 0.63 (blue dots). Dashed lines are drawn to guide the eye.
Characterization of CH/HA coacervates after dilution 1:10 (v/v) in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) buffer. Coacervates were fabricated using chitosans at different fractions of acetylated units (FA). The hydrodynamic diameter, stability at time zero and polydispersity index (PDI) (all of them ± SD) of the resulting formulations are reported.
| FA |
| Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | PDI | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.16 | 30,000 | [270 ± 42] (*) | [0.40 ± 0.03] (*) | unstable |
| 220,000 | 773 ± 21 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | stable | |
| 340,000 | [1307 ± 461] (*) | [0.35 ± 0.36] (*) | unstable | |
| 0.46 | 100,000 | [194 ± 38] (*) | [0.49 ± 0.23] (*) | unstable |
| 210,000 | [982 ± 743] (*) | [0.76 ± 0.28] (*) | unstable | |
| 300,000 | [213 ± 49] (*) | [0.32 ± 0.06] (*) | unstable | |
| 0.63 | 90,000 | [1060 ± 823] (*) | [0.82 ± 0.20] (*) | unstable |
| 170,000 | [1037 ± 21] (*) | [0.38 ± 0.04] (*) | unstable | |
| 310,000 | [103 ± 24] (*) | [0.66 ± 0.02] (*) | unstable |
(*) stands for formulations where significant signal errors in the size quality report were detected by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analyses.
Figure 3DLS intensity size distribution curves of coacervates composed by FA = 0.16 chitosans at different molar mass (g/mol): = 30,000 g/mol (A), 220,000 g/mol (B) and 340,000 g/mol (C). Coacervates were diluted 1:10 (v/v) into two different media prior to measurements, namely deionized water and PBS.
Figure 4Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) pattern profiles of coacervates composed by FA = 0.16 and = 220,000 g/mol chitosan. Coacervates are dispersed in deionized water (black dots) and PBS (blue dots). The final medium composition is the following: 90% v/v coacervates in deionized water + 10% v/v deionized water or 10X PBS. The red solid lines represent the best fit of experimental data according to eq. (1).