| Literature DB >> 32120792 |
Jiraporn Lueangsakulthai1, Baidya Nath P Sah1, Brian P Scottoline2, David C Dallas1.
Abstract
To prevent infectious diarrhea in infants, orally-supplemented enteric pathogen-specific recombinant antibodies would need to resist degradation in the gastrointestinal tract. Palivizumab, a recombinant antibody specific to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), was used as a model to assess the digestion of neutralizing antibodies in infant digestion. The aim was to determine the remaining binding activity of RSV F protein-specific monoclonal and naturally-occurring immunoglobulins (Ig) in different isoforms (IgG, IgA, and sIgA) across an ex vivo model of infant digestion. RSV F protein-specific monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and sIgA) and milk-derived naturally-occurring Ig (IgG and sIgA/IgA) were exposed to an ex vivo model of digestion using digestive samples from infants (gastric and intestinal samples). The survival of each antibody was tested via an RSV F protein-specific ELISA. Ex vivo gastric and intestinal digestion degraded palivizumab IgG, IgA, and sIgA (p < 0.05). However, the naturally-occurring RSV F protein-specific IgG and sIgA/IgA found in human milk were stable across gastric and intestinal ex vivo digestion. The structural differences between recombinant and naturally-occurring antibodies need to be closely examined to guide future design of recombinant antibodies with increased stability for use in the gastrointestinal tract.Entities:
Keywords: gastrointestinal digestion; immunoglobulins; infants; palivizumab; respiratory syncytial virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32120792 PMCID: PMC7146391 DOI: 10.3390/nu12030621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Demographics of preterm-delivering mother–infant pairs sampled for mother’s own breastmilk, formula milk, gastric contents (1 h postprandial time), and intestinal contents (2 h postprandial time).
| Demographics | Infant 1 | Infant 2 | Infant 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (GA) at birth, weeks | 31.6 | 31.6 | 27.1 |
| Corrected Gestational age, weeks | 36.2 | 36.3 | 38 |
| Postnatal age at feeding, days | 33 | 34 | 76 |
| Bodyweight, kg | 2.45 | 2.82 | 2.7 |
| Length, cm | 47 | 42 | 45 |
| Head circumference, cm | 35 | 35.5 | 32 |
| Total kilocalories intake, kcal/kg/day | 147 | 165 | 120 |
| Feed sources | Mother’s milk fortified 1 | Mother’s milk fortified 1 | Formula |
1 Mother’s milk fortified with Similac Neosure®.
Validation of RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) F protein-specific palivizumab IgG, IgA, and sIgA using the calculation of precision, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and upper limit of quantification (ULOQ).
| Parameters | Palivizumab IgG | Palivizumab IgA | Palivizumab sIgA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric | Intestinal | Gastric | Intestinal | Gastric | Intestinal | |
| Precision (% CV) | 19.59 | 27.77 | 11.75 | 13.86 | 11.83 | 15.25 |
| LLOQ (ng/mL) | 1 | 1 | 25 | 25 | 5 | 5 |
| ULOQ (ng/mL) | 100 | 100 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Figure 1Percentage stability of palivizumab IgG, IgA, and sIgA across ex vivo infant digestion. (A) Percentage stability of palivizumab IgG, (C) IgA, and (E) sIgA across gastric digestion. (B) Percentage stability of palivizumab IgG, (D) IgA, and (F) sIgA across intestinal digestion. Values are mean ± SD, n = 18; three infants with two dilutions in triplicate. Asterisks represent the p-value (* p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001) using the unpaired student’s t-tests to compare stability between gastric 0 h and 1 h samples. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to compare stability among intestinal 0, 1, and 2 h samples.
Figure 2Percentage stability of naturally-occurring IgG and sIgA/IgA across ex vivo infant digestion. (A) Percentage stability of naturally-occurring IgG and (C) sIgA/IgA across gastric digestion. (B) Percentage stability of naturally-occurring IgG and (D) sIgA/IgA across intestinal digestion. Values are mean ± SD, n = 12; two infants with two dilutions in triplicate. The unpaired student’s t-tests were used to compare stability between gastric 0 h and 1 h samples. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to compare stability among intestinal 0, 1, and 2 h samples.