Stephanie A Leonard1, Barbara Abrams2, Elliott K Main3, Deirdre J Lyell3, Suzan L Carmichael1. 1. Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 3. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Obstetrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High and low prepregnancy BMI are risk factors for severe maternal morbidity (SMM), but the contribution of gestational weight gain (GWG) is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated associations between GWG and SMM by prepregnancy BMI group. METHODS: We analyzed administrative records from 2,483,684 Californian births (2007-2012), utilizing z score charts to standardize GWG for gestational duration. We fit the z scores nonlinearly and categorized GWG as above, within, or below the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations after predicting equivalent GWG at term from the z score charts. SMM was defined using a validated index. Associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found generally shallow U-shaped relations between GWG z score and SMM in all BMI groups, except class 3 obesity (≥40 kg/m2), for which risk was lowest with weight loss. The weight gain amount associated with the lowest risk of SMM was within the IOM recommendations for underweight and class 2 obesity, but above the IOM recommendations for normal weight, overweight, and class 1 obesity. The adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for GWG below the IOM recommendations, compared with GWG within the recommendations, were the following for underweight, normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity: 1.13 (0.99, 1.29), 1.09 (1.04, 1.14), 1.10 (1.01, 1.19), 1.07 (0.95, 1.21), 1.03 (0.88, 1.22), and 0.89 (0.73, 1.08), respectively. For GWG above the recommendations, the corresponding RRs and 95% CIs were 0.99 (0.84, 1.15), 1.04 (0.99, 1.08), 0.98 (0.92, 1.04), 1.03 (0.95, 1.13), 1.07 (0.94, 1.23), and 1.08 (0.91, 1.30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High and low GWG may be modestly associated with increased risk of SMM across BMI groups, except in women with class 3 obesity, for whom low weight gain and weight loss may be associated with decreased risk of SMM.
BACKGROUND: High and low prepregnancy BMI are risk factors for severe maternal morbidity (SMM), but the contribution of gestational weight gain (GWG) is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated associations between GWG and SMM by prepregnancy BMI group. METHODS: We analyzed administrative records from 2,483,684 Californian births (2007-2012), utilizing z score charts to standardize GWG for gestational duration. We fit the z scores nonlinearly and categorized GWG as above, within, or below the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations after predicting equivalent GWG at term from the z score charts. SMM was defined using a validated index. Associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found generally shallow U-shaped relations between GWG z score and SMM in all BMI groups, except class 3 obesity (≥40 kg/m2), for which risk was lowest with weight loss. The weight gain amount associated with the lowest risk of SMM was within the IOM recommendations for underweight and class 2 obesity, but above the IOM recommendations for normal weight, overweight, and class 1 obesity. The adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for GWG below the IOM recommendations, compared with GWG within the recommendations, were the following for underweight, normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity: 1.13 (0.99, 1.29), 1.09 (1.04, 1.14), 1.10 (1.01, 1.19), 1.07 (0.95, 1.21), 1.03 (0.88, 1.22), and 0.89 (0.73, 1.08), respectively. For GWG above the recommendations, the corresponding RRs and 95% CIs were 0.99 (0.84, 1.15), 1.04 (0.99, 1.08), 0.98 (0.92, 1.04), 1.03 (0.95, 1.13), 1.07 (0.94, 1.23), and 1.08 (0.91, 1.30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High and low GWG may be modestly associated with increased risk of SMM across BMI groups, except in women with class 3 obesity, for whom low weight gain and weight loss may be associated with decreased risk of SMM.
Authors: Laura Schummers; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Lisa M Bodnar; Ellice Lieberman; Katherine P Himes Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Hyagriv N Simhan; Katherine P Himes; Barbara Abrams Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Victoria L Holt; Jennifer C Nelson; Vicky Cárdenas; Carolyn Gardella; Thomas R Easterling; William M Callaghan Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Lara L Siminerio; Katherine P Himes; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Timothy L Lash; Sara M Parisi; Barbara Abrams Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Line Rode; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Leila Cheikh Ismail; Deborah C Bishop; Ruyan Pang; Eric O Ohuma; Gilberto Kac; Barbara Abrams; Kathleen Rasmussen; Fernando C Barros; Jane E Hirst; Ann Lambert; Aris T Papageorghiou; William Stones; Yasmin A Jaffer; Douglas G Altman; J Alison Noble; Maria Rosa Giolito; Michael G Gravett; Manorama Purwar; Stephen H Kennedy; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; José Villar Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-02-29