Literature DB >> 32119129

Using mHealth in postpartum women with pre-eclampsia: Lessons learned from a qualitative study.

Nalin Payakachat1, Sarah Rhoads2, Hannah McCoy3, Nafisa Dajani4, Hari Eswaran3,4, Curtis Lowery3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore perceptions and attitudes of postpartum women with pre-eclampsia towards remote monitoring (mHealth) and communication with the call center.
METHODS: A non-randomized cohort study was conducted in postpartum hypertensive women, recruited from a tertiary hospital between October 2015 and February 2016. Participants were categorized into users (using mHealth) and non-users (not using mHealth) to monitor vital signs at home over a 2-week period after discharge. Non-users were informed about functionality of mHealth. Both groups participated in a 30-minute phone interview at the end of the study. Directed content analysis of interview transcripts was conducted.
RESULTS: In total, 21 users and 16 non-users participated in the interview. Both groups perceived that mHealth helped manage their condition. However, non-users were concerned about the challenge of incorporating mHealth into their routine, whereas users mentioned that they liked using mHealth on a daily basis. They also stated that communication with nurses in the call center was helpful. Barriers identified by users included size of the blood pressure cuffs, size of the equipment set, wireless connection, and stress associated with mHealth monitoring. Users stated that they would have preferred using mHealth during pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: The findings provide useful insights to inform a successful remote monitoring program among perinatal and postpartum women.
© 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perception; Postpartum; Pre-eclampsia; Pregnancy; Qualitative study; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32119129      PMCID: PMC7239748          DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  21 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Exploring Implementation of m-Health Monitoring in Postpartum Women with Hypertension.

Authors:  Sarah J Rhoads; Christina I Serrano; Christian E Lynch; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; C Heath Gauss; Nalin Payakachat; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Newborn health on the line: the potential mHealth applications.

Authors:  Smisha Agarwal; Alain Labrique
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia.

Authors:  Baha M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The impact of a remote monitoring program on the prenatal follow-up of women with gestational hypertensive disorders.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Sharona Vonck; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Improving maternal and perinatal outcomes in the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a vision of a community-focused approach.

Authors:  Peter von Dadelszen; J Mark Ansermino; Guy Dumont; G Justus Hofmeyr; Laura A Magee; Matthews Mathai; Diane Sawchuck; Kate Teela; France Donnay; James M Roberts
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 8.  Distributing medical expertise: the evolution and impact of telemedicine in arkansas.

Authors:  Curtis L Lowery; Janet M Bronstein; Tina L Benton; David A Fletcher
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Scaling up mHealth: where is the evidence?

Authors:  Mark Tomlinson; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Leslie Swartz; Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siew Hwa Lee; Ulugbek B Nurmatov; Bright I Nwaru; Mome Mukherjee; Liz Grant; Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.413

View more
  1 in total

1.  Users' Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Jane Li; David Silvera-Tawil; Marlien Varnfield; M Sazzad Hussain; Vanitha Math
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.