Literature DB >> 18806149

CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure.

Jacob Sosna1, Jacob Bar-Ziv, Eugene Libson, Merab Eligulashvili, Arye Blachar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of the order of positions on sustained rectal pressure and factors affecting pain perceived by patients during air-insufflated CT colonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Rectal pressure was measured in the supine and prone positions for CT colonography of 379 patients in two groups. One hundred seventy-seven patients underwent imaging supine and then prone, and 202 patients were prone and then supine. Insufflation and patient pain parameters were based on patient self-report and investigator visualization of observable indicators. Colonic distention, residual feces or fluid, and diverticulosis were evaluated with a semiquantitative scoring system. Fisher's exact, Student's t, and chi-square tests as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.
RESULTS: Pressure was higher in the prone than in the supine position in both groups (p < 0.001). The measured pressure in the initial position did not differ between groups (p = 0.88). Pressure increased from 38.3 to 40.07 mm Hg in the second position in the supine-first group and decreased from 38.3 to 32.25 mm Hg in the second position in the prone-first group (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with pain in the second position was 40% in the supine-first group compared with 18% in the prone-first group (p < 0.003). Distention did not differ between the groups. Pain was associated with increased pressure and diverticulosis (p < 0.001) but not with retained feces or fluid.
CONCLUSION: Sustained pressure in the air-insufflated colon was higher in the prone than in the supine position. Imaging in the prone position first results in a significant decrease in pressure in the latter phase and less pain. Pain was associated with pressure and diverticulosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18806149     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  A comparative study of degree of colorectal distention with manual air insufflation or automated CO(2) insufflation at CT colonography as a preoperative examination.

Authors:  Hidenori Kanazawa; Kenichi Utano; Shigeyoshi Kijima; Takahiro Sasaki; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Hisanaga Horie; Yoshikazu Nakamura; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Novel device to detect enterotomies in real time during laparoscopy: first in human trial during Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Elisabeth K Wynne; Dan E Azagury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Computed tomographic pneumocolonography in normal dogs.

Authors:  Michele A Steffey; Leticia Daniel; Sandra L Taylor; Rachel X Chen; Allison L Zwingenberger
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Jiri Jahoda; Gabriela Grusova; Pavel Hrabak; Ales Novotny; Andrea Burgetova
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Computed tomography colonography technique: the role of intracolonic gas volume.

Authors:  Patrick D McLaughlin; Kevin P Murphy; Lee Crush; Owen J O'Connor; Joseph P Coyle; Cressida R Brennan; Attiya Suhail; Denis Kelly; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 6.  Logical hypothesis: Low FODMAP diet to prevent diverticulitis.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Uno; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-11-06

7.  A multi-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the value of a single bolus intravenous alfentanil in CT colonography.

Authors:  Thierry N Boellaard; Marije P van der Paardt; Markus W Hollmann; Susanne Eberl; Jan Peringa; Lex J Schouten; Giedre Kavaliauskiene; Jurgen H Runge; Jeroen A W Tielbeek; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A hydraulically driven colonoscope.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Markus Pakleppa; Jan B Vorstius; Robert P Keatch; Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.