Literature DB >> 3211482

Silicone intubation for the treatment of congenital lacrimal duct obstruction: successful results removing the tubes after six weeks.

M E Migliori1, A M Putterman.   

Abstract

There is little agreement in the ophthalmic literature on the optimum length of time that silicone tubes should be left in place after lacrimal intubation for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Various authors have recommended leaving the tubes in for 3 to 6 months. The authors of this article believe this to be an excessive amount of time. Lacrimal probing, inferior turbinate fracture, and silicone intubation were performed in children ranging in age from 3 months to 5 years. The tubes were removed after 6 weeks in all cases. Resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis was achieved in all cases. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 81 months. The authors recommend that the silicone tubes be removed after 6 weeks. They also believe that fracture of the inferior turbinate should be performed along with silicone intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3211482     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33122-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Nasal endoscopy-guided primary nasolacrimal duct intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 4 years.

Authors:  Ceyhun Arici; Bilge Batu Oto
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  The course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yanir Kassif; Uri Rehany; Michal David; Anna Popko; Shimon Rumelt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Scott Atkinson; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Alexander Khammar; David Morrison; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Balloon catheter dilation and nasolacrimal duct intubation for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed probing.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Darren L Hoover; Christine L Morse; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; D Robbins Tien
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05

5.  Nasolacrimal duct intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.

Authors:  S Okumuş; V Öner; C Durucu; E Coşkun; Ü Aksoy; E Durucu; L Şahin; I Erbağcı
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Balloon dacryocystoplasty and monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yu Hsun Huang; Shu Lang Liao; Luke L-K Lin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Assessment and management of proximal and incomplete symptomatic obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Farzad Pakdel; Victoria Kiavash
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

8.  Preventing silicone tube extrusion after nasolacrimal duct intubation in children.

Authors:  Ali-Akbar Sabermoghaddam; Setareh Sagheb Hosseinpoor
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2010-10

9.  Pulled versus Pushed Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation in Adults with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis: A Comparative Case Series.

Authors:  Abolfazl Kasaee; Bahram Eshraghi; Kambiz Ameli; Hossein Ghahvehchian; Mansooreh Jamshidian-Tehrani; Amin Nabavi; Bahman Inanloo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.