Literature DB >> 32114813

Rate and risk factors for wound complications after internal hemipelvectomy.

Koichi Ogura1, Patrick J Boland1, Nicola Fabbri1, John H Healey2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although internal hemipelvectomy is associated with a high incidence of morbidity, especially wound complications, few studies have examined rates of wound complications in these patients or have identified factors associated with the consequences. The present study aimed to: 1) determine the rate of wound and other complications requiring surgery after internal hemipelvectomy; and 2) identify factors that affect the rate of wound complications and can be used to stratify patients by risk of wound complications.
METHODS: The medical records of 123 patients undergoing internal hemipelvectomy were retrospectively reviewed, with a focus on both overall complications and wound complications. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between host, tumour, and surgical factors and rates of postoperative wound complications.
RESULTS: The overall rate of postoperative complications requiring surgery was 49.6%. Wound complications were observed in 34.1% of patients, hardware-related complications in 13.2%, graft-related complications in 9.1%, and local recurrence in 5.7%. On multivariate analysis, extrapelvic tumour extension (odds ratio (OR) 23.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.97 to 274.67; p = 0.012), both intra- and extrapelvic tumour extension (OR 46.48; 95% CI, 3.50 to 617.77; p = 0.004), blood transfusion ≥ 20 units (OR 50.28; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1550.32; p = 0.025), vascular sacrifice of the internal iliac artery (OR 64.56; 95% CI, 6.33 to 658.43; p < 0.001), and use of a structural allograft (OR, 6.57; 95% CI, 1.70 to 25.34; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with postoperative wound complications.
CONCLUSION: Internal hemipelvectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity, especially wound complications. Several host, tumour, and surgical variables are associated with wound complications. The ability to stratify patients by risk of wound complications can help refine surgical and wound-healing planning and may lead to better outcomes in patients undergoing internal hemipelvectomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):280-284.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemipelvectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32114813      PMCID: PMC7123980          DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  19 in total

1.  The impact of time of admission on major complications and mortality in patients undergoing emergency trauma surgery.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-06

2.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017.

Authors:  J Sybil Biermann; Warren Chow; Damon R Reed; David Lucas; Douglas R Adkins; Mark Agulnik; Robert S Benjamin; Brian Brigman; G Thomas Budd; William T Curry; Aarati Didwania; Nicola Fabbri; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph B Kuechle; Dieter Lindskog; Joel Mayerson; Sean V McGarry; Lynn Million; Carol D Morris; Sujana Movva; Richard J O'Donnell; R Lor Randall; Peter Rose; Victor M Santana; Robert L Satcher; Herbert Schwartz; Herrick J Siegel; Katherine Thornton; Victor Villalobos; Mary Anne Bergman; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  J A Jansen; M A J van de Sande; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Osteosarcoma of the pelvis.

Authors:  R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman; D Spooner; D C Mangham; Y Kabukcuoglu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

5.  Grading of osteoporosis on biopsy specimens.

Authors:  O Lindahl
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1966

6.  Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor.

Authors:  Christian Delloye; Xavier Banse; Bénédicte Brichard; Pierre-Louis Docquier; Olivier Cornu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Outcome after surgical treatment of pelvic sarcomas.

Authors:  Ilkyu Han; Young Min Lee; Hwan Seong Cho; Joo Han Oh; Sang Hoon Lee; Han-Soo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 8.  Hip transposition as a universal surgical procedure for periacetabular tumors of the pelvis.

Authors:  Carsten Gebert; Georg Gosheger; Winfried Winkelmann
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Tumors of the pelvis: complications after reconstruction.

Authors:  A Hillmann; C Hoffmann; G Gosheger; R Rödl; W Winkelmann; T Ozaki
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Infection after surgical resection for pelvic bone tumors: an analysis of 270 patients from one institution.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Gabriele Drago; Giulia Trovarelli; Teresa Calabrò; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  How Do the Outcomes of Radiation-Associated Pelvic and Sacral Bone Sarcomas Compare to Primary Osteosarcomas following Surgical Resection?

Authors:  Alexander L Lazarides; Zachary D C Burke; Manit K Gundavda; Rostislav Novak; Michelle Ghert; David A Wilson; Peter S Rose; Philip Wong; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder; Matthew T Houdek; Kim M Tsoi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  External and internal hemipelvectomy: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Onur Karaca; Emre Anıl Özbek; Mustafa Özyıldıran; Abdullah Merter; Kerem Başarır; Hüseyin Yusuf Yıldız; Yener Sağlık
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-03-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.